
I agree the case needs to be tried. Fortunately, AG Barr is in charge now. It is his DOJ that is pursuing this case. |
Oh, yippee! |
I would prefer the NY AG pursue the charges, given the evidence is being gathered, in part, by the NYPD. |
Good idea. |
Barr has an Epstein connection. His dad hired him at Dalton and resigned shortly thereafter.
We’ll see what happens. But let me reiterate “get bent” to the Clinton hysterics. If the evidence shows Bill raped? Lock him up and throw away the damned key. If it points to him and Trump? Let ‘em share a cell. But I know the fatburgs here will sob and cry and say, butbutbut Bill flew 200 times to Dotard’s one time!!! No fair!!! - ignoring that Trump spent gobs of time local to Epstein in Manhattan and Florida, and given that Trump has never been one for extensive travel to islands or other places beyond what he knows. Let’s ignore that, eh, whatabout shitposters? Of course that’s what you’re doing and will do. |
And if the damned evidence shows Trumped raped girls, would you want him punished? Or is it ok if he does it? |
Oh, ho, ho, you know that super brilliant cautious poster can’t answer that honestly. |
Trump has his own plane; he didn’t need Epstein’s. Who knows how many times Trump visited Epstein - and whether there is a record of it. Spare me the lecture about innocent until proven guilty; the rules are different for the rich and powerful, as we’ve seen many times over, especially recently. |
Once again......... "If" indicates assumptions. |
Do Republicans believe Epstein is innocent? Do they also support Acosta as Secretary of Labor? |
Sweetheart, no. It’s a hypothetical. Words mean things to adults. |
I, for one, am waiting to see the evidence and hear the charges against him. As of now, the indictment hasn't been unsealed so we have no idea what the exact charges are. Having said that, knowing that he pleaded guilty to lesser charges 10 years ago, I believe he is guilty of some pretty serious stuff. As for Acosta - I need to see the evidence and learn exactly what his role was in the prosecution. |
Or you could have read the papers last year. I have such complete contempt for people like you who pretend to be cautious when you’ve been deliberately ostriching on all Trumpworld scandals for years now. You are disgusting. History will judge you harshly and accurately. |
It has been pretty extensively documented. Try reading some articles that have already been posted in this thread. |
Some of us firmly believe in the presumption of innocence. Sorry that disgusts you. |