Amen to this! |
Lord knows there’s *never* been a civic association in Arlington split between two or more elementary schools. How ever would you all survive?!?!? |
No school wants to be split. That's apparent. And reasonable. Henry agreed to move 0.5 miles, with the specific understanding that this would not be used against it in future boundary disputes. Really. It was told that the boundaries would stay intact, that's the main reason the school didn't fight the move. Fairlington is literally divided by an Interstate. Also end-to-end Fairlington is bigger than from Rt 50 to the Columbia Heights units that want to stay at Fleet. So don't pretend that it's impossible or unreasonable that Fairlington could be divided. You can say you don't like it. That's fine. I don't blame you. No one likes it. |
I guess what I don't understand is what kind of devil's bargain was worked out with Henry parents and where were the rest of South Arlington when these discussions occurred? Why do parents at one elementary school have such an outsized effect on the rest of the school districts? Honestly, why would Henry parents honestly believe they wouldn't be considered for Drew when they're literally 7/10 a mile away? We need boundaries that look out for the schools' best interests, not one specific neighborhood over another, whatever that neighborhood happens to be. I really feel like the entire boundary redesign is being held hostage by a pact that Henry parents may or may not have made years ago. |
It wasn't a pact. It was a recommendation by the SAWG coinciding with the recommendation that some of Oakridge's PU move into Drew. Since Oakridge isn't moving into Drew the recommendation for PH to move as a whole isn't feasible. |
|
Henry parents did consider the possibility that they’d be moved to Drew. Hence the matching t-shirts.
Might be time to start another Drew thread. This one seems to have been overtaken by CH and Fairlington families. |
The school board didn’t promise them this. Columbia Heights and Nauck neighborhood boundaries boarder each other! It’s simply more logical for those planning units that boarder Nauck to go to Drew and I believe there are many in the Drew/Nauck community that agree with this- I obviously haven’t polled the whole neighborhood but it’s what I’ve heard from some acquaintances that live there. On the other hand, there a large portion of the Fairlington planning unit that they are talking about splitting that can and do walk to Abingdon. There is a bridge with sidewalks that crosses 395 and kids walk everyday. They live 1/2 a mile from Abingdon but will be bused to Drew. I’m just trying to see how CHs going to Drew isn’t more logical. |
https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/legacy_assets/www/412115d251-SB_Final_Update_11052015.pdf |
They're really two different neighborhoods, separated by 395. All his sudden cohesion is dubious. |
The point is what? It's a recommendation. Not a binding contract. The final (summary) report conveniently ignores a lot of other recommendations included in the full report, like the part about diversity that was discussed at many meetings. |
I live in North Fairlington and think sending South Fairlington to Drew is a good idea. I don't think the argument that the community needs to be kept together is very strong, half the kids I meet in the neighborhood go to Claremont anyway. |
| I used to live in Fairlington. South Fairlington gets busing anyway. If they went to Drew and the weird peninsulas proposed for Drew were sent back to Abington, it would make a lot more sense. It would also address some of the SES issues at Drew with the current proposal. I also think Henry should not get a pass in this round. Send some of their non-walkers to Randolph or Drew. |
Here we go again..... Henry graciously "agreed" and was duped. SAWG's recommendation was just that - a recommendation; and that recommendation did not stipulate the boundaries would not be touched. But thanks for giving the SB the permission they needed to accept the SAWG's recommendation. The rest of us, especially the 80% FRL students about to be concentrated at Drew, thank you.
|
No. You can believe that if you want, especially if you're outside that half mile and need to think the "the school's" solidarity with you was why they didn't object. They wanted a bigger school. They needed a bigger school. This was the only way they were going to get it. THAT's why they "didn't fight it." They may be unhappy that their boundary needs to be adjusted; but that was going to happen one day inevitably anyway. |
Don't see the point of this link. It's a summary that DOES NOT mention ANYthing about Henry boundaries. |