Why are younger men so right wing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Young men are more right wing today because they've been tricked and misled by hucksters and grifters into thinking that Donald Trump will somehow look out for their interests in a way that Democrats won't.

This is the "What's the Matter with Kansas" problem again...people voting against their own interests because some corrupt politicians told them it's "macho" to vote Republican.

Here are some hints, young men: if you think the Republicans love you more than the Democrats do, you're a sucker. If you think the Republicans will look out for your interests more than Democrats will, you're a fool. And if you think Fox News is more accurate than CNN News, you're an idiot.

Nah. I don’t think the current Repubs are their friends (too much corruption), but dems actively hate them. They first abandoned a generation of young men in the 90s through Clinton free trade policies, the liberalization of oxy and prescription drugs and for AA men, mass incarceration. Those policies set the stage for deaths of despair. Then they trashed their value systems by trying to enforce a set of bizarre social ideas on them they didnt want. Then they sold them out again with the china trade and the Obama corporate bailout which once again blew a hole through a lot of remaining male working class jobs. Dems were then complicit in shutting males, especially white ones, out of key entry level jobs in especially media in the 10s as well as academic jobs and admissions. Not sure how voting dem is voting your own interest there. And then through me too and the aftermath of 2020, dems made it known that men were not to be trusted in society. Again, why would they vote for them? The backlash has been a long time brewing and represents a full generation of dislike of males and the younger ones are now pushing back. Dems think they can buy men off with a few cheap centralized social initiatives, but they just don’t like them. Be honest. They need a reset.

Democrats don't care, no matter how many thinkpieces come out. They're gonna act oblivious when Vance is elected as well.

Trump is polling at 40%, Vance, Groypers etc will be lucky if they can even get half that. That's not "oblivious" - that's awareness of ground reality. Good luck. Honestly, I hope you run with that strategy, because your loss will be epic.

Rookie mistake. Everyone in this field looks bad in a vacuum, for good reason.

But when you compare them head to head, that is what really matters come election time. Where is AOC, Jeffries, Waltz, Moore, Newsom, or pick your favorite Dem, when poled in a vacuum right now ? I bet their number suck also.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Young men are more right wing today because they've been tricked and misled by hucksters and grifters into thinking that Donald Trump will somehow look out for their interests in a way that Democrats won't.

This is the "What's the Matter with Kansas" problem again...people voting against their own interests because some corrupt politicians told them it's "macho" to vote Republican.

Here are some hints, young men: if you think the Republicans love you more than the Democrats do, you're a sucker. If you think the Republicans will look out for your interests more than Democrats will, you're a fool. And if you think Fox News is more accurate than CNN News, you're an idiot.

Nah. I don’t think the current Repubs are their friends (too much corruption), but dems actively hate them. They first abandoned a generation of young men in the 90s through Clinton free trade policies, the liberalization of oxy and prescription drugs and for AA men, mass incarceration. Those policies set the stage for deaths of despair. Then they trashed their value systems by trying to enforce a set of bizarre social ideas on them they didnt want. Then they sold them out again with the china trade and the Obama corporate bailout which once again blew a hole through a lot of remaining male working class jobs. Dems were then complicit in shutting males, especially white ones, out of key entry level jobs in especially media in the 10s as well as academic jobs and admissions. Not sure how voting dem is voting your own interest there. And then through me too and the aftermath of 2020, dems made it known that men were not to be trusted in society. Again, why would they vote for them? The backlash has been a long time brewing and represents a full generation of dislike of males and the younger ones are now pushing back. Dems think they can buy men off with a few cheap centralized social initiatives, but they just don’t like them. Be honest. They need a reset.

Democrats don't care, no matter how many thinkpieces come out. They're gonna act oblivious when Vance is elected as well.

Trump is polling at 40%, Vance, Groypers etc will be lucky if they can even get half that. That's not "oblivious" - that's awareness of ground reality. Good luck. Honestly, I hope you run with that strategy, because your loss will be epic.

Rookie mistake. Everyone in this field looks bad in a vacuum, for good reason.

But when you compare them head to head, that is what really matters come election time. Where is AOC, Jeffries, Waltz, Moore, Newsom, or pick your favorite Dem, when poled in a vacuum right now ? I bet their number suck also.

Rookie mistake would be thinking the the GOP nominee had a chance in 2020, or the Dem nominee had a chance in 2024 or the GOP nominee will have chance in 2028.

Common sense- try it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Young men are more right wing today because they've been tricked and misled by hucksters and grifters into thinking that Donald Trump will somehow look out for their interests in a way that Democrats won't.

This is the "What's the Matter with Kansas" problem again...people voting against their own interests because some corrupt politicians told them it's "macho" to vote Republican.

Here are some hints, young men: if you think the Republicans love you more than the Democrats do, you're a sucker. If you think the Republicans will look out for your interests more than Democrats will, you're a fool. And if you think Fox News is more accurate than CNN News, you're an idiot.

Nah. I don’t think the current Repubs are their friends (too much corruption), but dems actively hate them. They first abandoned a generation of young men in the 90s through Clinton free trade policies, the liberalization of oxy and prescription drugs and for AA men, mass incarceration. Those policies set the stage for deaths of despair. Then they trashed their value systems by trying to enforce a set of bizarre social ideas on them they didnt want. Then they sold them out again with the china trade and the Obama corporate bailout which once again blew a hole through a lot of remaining male working class jobs. Dems were then complicit in shutting males, especially white ones, out of key entry level jobs in especially media in the 10s as well as academic jobs and admissions. Not sure how voting dem is voting your own interest there. And then through me too and the aftermath of 2020, dems made it known that men were not to be trusted in society. Again, why would they vote for them? The backlash has been a long time brewing and represents a full generation of dislike of males and the younger ones are now pushing back. Dems think they can buy men off with a few cheap centralized social initiatives, but they just don’t like them. Be honest. They need a reset.

Democrats don't care, no matter how many thinkpieces come out. They're gonna act oblivious when Vance is elected as well.

Trump is polling at 40%, Vance, Groypers etc will be lucky if they can even get half that. That's not "oblivious" - that's awareness of ground reality. Good luck. Honestly, I hope you run with that strategy, because your loss will be epic.

Rookie mistake. Everyone in this field looks bad in a vacuum, for good reason.

But when you compare them head to head, that is what really matters come election time. Where is AOC, Jeffries, Waltz, Moore, Newsom, or pick your favorite Dem, when poled in a vacuum right now ? I bet their number suck also.

Rookie mistake would be thinking the the GOP nominee had a chance in 2020, or the Dem nominee had a chance in 2024 or the GOP nominee will have chance in 2028.

Common sense- try it

Disagree, Trump doesn’t have a glaring mistake like Biden’s immigration at this point. Of course, he does have 3 years to make that mistake.

My point is the field is so bad, vacuum poling is meaningless today. Personally, I don’t like any of them from either side of the aisle. Hoping for an outsider that can rise above the partisan nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:False premise.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Young men are more right wing today because they've been tricked and misled by hucksters and grifters into thinking that Donald Trump will somehow look out for their interests in a way that Democrats won't.

This is the "What's the Matter with Kansas" problem again...people voting against their own interests because some corrupt politicians told them it's "macho" to vote Republican.

Here are some hints, young men: if you think the Republicans love you more than the Democrats do, you're a sucker. If you think the Republicans will look out for your interests more than Democrats will, you're a fool. And if you think Fox News is more accurate than CNN News, you're an idiot.

Nah. I don’t think the current Repubs are their friends (too much corruption), but dems actively hate them. They first abandoned a generation of young men in the 90s through Clinton free trade policies, the liberalization of oxy and prescription drugs and for AA men, mass incarceration. Those policies set the stage for deaths of despair. Then they trashed their value systems by trying to enforce a set of bizarre social ideas on them they didnt want. Then they sold them out again with the china trade and the Obama corporate bailout which once again blew a hole through a lot of remaining male working class jobs. Dems were then complicit in shutting males, especially white ones, out of key entry level jobs in especially media in the 10s as well as academic jobs and admissions. Not sure how voting dem is voting your own interest there. And then through me too and the aftermath of 2020, dems made it known that men were not to be trusted in society. Again, why would they vote for them? The backlash has been a long time brewing and represents a full generation of dislike of males and the younger ones are now pushing back. Dems think they can buy men off with a few cheap centralized social initiatives, but they just don’t like them. Be honest. They need a reset.

Democrats don't care, no matter how many thinkpieces come out. They're gonna act oblivious when Vance is elected as well.

Trump is polling at 40%, Vance, Groypers etc will be lucky if they can even get half that. That's not "oblivious" - that's awareness of ground reality. Good luck. Honestly, I hope you run with that strategy, because your loss will be epic.

Vance's loss will be epic when he gets crushed by ______________? (If only we had a good candidate, we could totally beat the Republicans in 2028!) Honestly, I hope the Republicans run with that strategy of assuming Democrats don't care about the voters enough to change. They are so wrong. Our candidate ______________ will win the primaries as a progressive but then totally tack to the center on a strong borders and traditional familes platform. But at the same time, our candidate ______________ will call the Republicans "groypers" so they seem like a small group of youtube followers instead of like the big group of voters who keeps beating us at the ballot box. This will work! Show 'em, ______________. You got this!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Young men are more right wing today because they've been tricked and misled by hucksters and grifters into thinking that Donald Trump will somehow look out for their interests in a way that Democrats won't.

This is the "What's the Matter with Kansas" problem again...people voting against their own interests because some corrupt politicians told them it's "macho" to vote Republican.

Here are some hints, young men: if you think the Republicans love you more than the Democrats do, you're a sucker. If you think the Republicans will look out for your interests more than Democrats will, you're a fool. And if you think Fox News is more accurate than CNN News, you're an idiot.

Nah. I don’t think the current Repubs are their friends (too much corruption), but dems actively hate them. They first abandoned a generation of young men in the 90s through Clinton free trade policies, the liberalization of oxy and prescription drugs and for AA men, mass incarceration. Those policies set the stage for deaths of despair. Then they trashed their value systems by trying to enforce a set of bizarre social ideas on them they didnt want. Then they sold them out again with the china trade and the Obama corporate bailout which once again blew a hole through a lot of remaining male working class jobs. Dems were then complicit in shutting males, especially white ones, out of key entry level jobs in especially media in the 10s as well as academic jobs and admissions. Not sure how voting dem is voting your own interest there. And then through me too and the aftermath of 2020, dems made it known that men were not to be trusted in society. Again, why would they vote for them? The backlash has been a long time brewing and represents a full generation of dislike of males and the younger ones are now pushing back. Dems think they can buy men off with a few cheap centralized social initiatives, but they just don’t like them. Be honest. They need a reset.

Democrats don't care, no matter how many thinkpieces come out. They're gonna act oblivious when Vance is elected as well.

Trump is polling at 40%, Vance, Groypers etc will be lucky if they can even get half that. That's not "oblivious" - that's awareness of ground reality. Good luck. Honestly, I hope you run with that strategy, because your loss will be epic.

Rookie mistake. Everyone in this field looks bad in a vacuum, for good reason.

But when you compare them head to head, that is what really matters come election time. Where is AOC, Jeffries, Waltz, Moore, Newsom, or pick your favorite Dem, when poled in a vacuum right now ? I bet their number suck also.

Rookie mistake would be thinking the the GOP nominee had a chance in 2020, or the Dem nominee had a chance in 2024 or the GOP nominee will have chance in 2028.

Common sense- try it

The GOP nominee did have a change in 2020, that's why it took 25 million extra votes and an extra week of counting for Biden to eke out the win by less than 45,000 votes total in the three decisive swing states.

Here's NBC News: "Throughout Trump's time in the White House, much has been made of how he won the presidency by under 78,000 votes in three states. And that point was true. Trump won because of narrow margins in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. But the margins this year were even tighter in the three states that put Biden over the top in the Electoral College. He won Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin by a total of less than 45,000 votes."

[Anonymous]

Democratic Party immigration policy was a liability in 2024, but it will be an asset in 2028.

Voter anger at Biden's open borders and at all the taxpayer benefits for illegal immigrants is fading, and it's being replaced by something else: voter dislike of deportations, ICE overreach, and Trump's ugly rhetoric.

When ICE tries to deport innocent hard-working maids, it makes the voters queasy. The mistreatment of illegal immigrants is a very bad look for Republicans.

Americans would rather have "chaos at the border" than this chaos in American cities. Voters are starting to shift toward Democratic immigration policy again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is all about sex. Conservative women are hotter. Conservative men get laid more than liberal man. Left men will disagree with this because no one wants to f them unless it is another man or ugly women.

Hilarious. I don't know of any liberal incels. That's a conservative guy thing, direct outcome of not getting laid. That's where so much of the right wing anger and inadequacy and compensation (oversized trucks etc) comes from. The only people impressed by ridiculous lifted trucks and noisy motorcycles are other guys. Women could give a shit.

This is a good point. Liberal men do tend to get more action than conservative men because there's more promiscuity on the left. But liberal women tend to remain single instead of getting married, also because there's more promiscuity on the left.

Nah, they tend to remain single because they don’t want to settle. MAGAfication has made men more obnoxious, transactional, misogynist and undateable. The right tells them what they want to hear, but it sucks at making them into functional adults who take responsibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is all about sex. Conservative women are hotter. Conservative men get laid more than liberal man. Left men will disagree with this because no one wants to f them unless it is another man or ugly women.

Case in point ^^^ This kind of drivel is what passes for critical thinking among young MAGA men these days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is all about sex. Conservative women are hotter. Conservative men get laid more than liberal man. Left men will disagree with this because no one wants to f them unless it is another man or ugly women.

Case in point ^^^ This kind of drivel is what passes for critical thinking among young MAGA men these days.

It’s also hilarious. Most of the young republican men are complete dorks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is all about sex. Conservative women are hotter. Conservative men get laid more than liberal man. Left men will disagree with this because no one wants to f them unless it is another man or ugly women.

Hilarious. I don't know of any liberal incels. That's a conservative guy thing, direct outcome of not getting laid. That's where so much of the right wing anger and inadequacy and compensation (oversized trucks etc) comes from. The only people impressed by ridiculous lifted trucks and noisy motorcycles are other guys. Women could give a shit.

This is a good point. Liberal men do tend to get more action than conservative men because there's more promiscuity on the left. But liberal women tend to remain single instead of getting married, also because there's more promiscuity on the left.

This comes down to simple math. Most gay males are liberal. They’re the liberal men getting the action. Most lesbians are liberals. They’re getting the action too. There’s a small percentage of masculine liberal men that do well for themselves but the rest of the liberal men drift awkwardly through life and would rather watch Harry Potter for the 48th time than approach a female. Then you have the man hating liberal females that want nothing to do with any men. That leaves normal liberal females that dip their toe into the conservative male pool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In recent years, Democrats really went out of their way to ostracize and demonize young straight white men. It's not a surprise some turned toward the Republican Party. The Democratic Party is a very little tent these days.

This is why. If you don’t support gender fluidity, men in woman’s sports and Palestine there is no place in the tent for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In recent years, Democrats really went out of their way to ostracize and demonize young straight white men. It's not a surprise some turned toward the Republican Party. The Democratic Party is a very little tent these days.

This is why. If you don’t support gender fluidity, men in woman’s sports and Palestine there is no place in the tent for you.

More evidence that Republicans are not the party of freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Young men are more right wing today because they've been tricked and misled by hucksters and grifters into thinking that Donald Trump will somehow look out for their interests in a way that Democrats won't.

This is the "What's the Matter with Kansas" problem again...people voting against their own interests because some corrupt politicians told them it's "macho" to vote Republican.

Here are some hints, young men: if you think the Republicans love you more than the Democrats do, you're a sucker. If you think the Republicans will look out for your interests more than Democrats will, you're a fool. And if you think Fox News is more accurate than CNN News, you're an idiot.

Nah. I don’t think the current Repubs are their friends (too much corruption), but dems actively hate them. They first abandoned a generation of young men in the 90s through Clinton free trade policies, the liberalization of oxy and prescription drugs and for AA men, mass incarceration. Those policies set the stage for deaths of despair. Then they trashed their value systems by trying to enforce a set of bizarre social ideas on them they didnt want. Then they sold them out again with the china trade and the Obama corporate bailout which once again blew a hole through a lot of remaining male working class jobs. Dems were then complicit in shutting males, especially white ones, out of key entry level jobs in especially media in the 10s as well as academic jobs and admissions. Not sure how voting dem is voting your own interest there. And then through me too and the aftermath of 2020, dems made it known that men were not to be trusted in society. Again, why would they vote for them? The backlash has been a long time brewing and represents a full generation of dislike of males and the younger ones are now pushing back. Dems think they can buy men off with a few cheap centralized social initiatives, but they just don’t like them. Be honest. They need a reset.

Democrats don't care, no matter how many thinkpieces come out. They're gonna act oblivious when Vance is elected as well.

Trump is polling at 40%, Vance, Groypers etc will be lucky if they can even get half that. That's not "oblivious" - that's awareness of ground reality. Good luck. Honestly, I hope you run with that strategy, because your loss will be epic.

Vance's loss will be epic when he gets crushed by ______________? (If only we had a good candidate, we could totally beat the Republicans in 2028!) Honestly, I hope the Republicans run with that strategy of assuming Democrats don't care about the voters enough to change. They are so wrong. Our candidate ______________ will win the primaries as a progressive but then totally tack to the center on a strong borders and traditional familes platform. But at the same time, our candidate ______________ will call the Republicans "groypers" so they seem like a small group of youtube followers instead of like the big group of voters who keeps beating us at the ballot box. This will work! Show 'em, ______________. You got this!

You miss the point. The point about "groypers" is because the Republicans are currently far more fragmented than any of their "leaders" and strategists want to publicly admit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is all about sex. Conservative women are hotter. Conservative men get laid more than liberal man. Left men will disagree with this because no one wants to f them unless it is another man or ugly women.

Hilarious. I don't know of any liberal incels. That's a conservative guy thing, direct outcome of not getting laid. That's where so much of the right wing anger and inadequacy and compensation (oversized trucks etc) comes from. The only people impressed by ridiculous lifted trucks and noisy motorcycles are other guys. Women could give a shit.

This is a good point. Liberal men do tend to get more action than conservative men because there's more promiscuity on the left. But liberal women tend to remain single instead of getting married, also because there's more promiscuity on the left.

This comes down to simple math. Most gay males are liberal. They’re the liberal men getting the action. Most lesbians are liberals. They’re getting the action too. There’s a small percentage of masculine liberal men that do well for themselves but the rest of the liberal men drift awkwardly through life and would rather watch Harry Potter for the 48th time than approach a female. Then you have the man hating liberal females that want nothing to do with any men. That leaves normal liberal females that dip their toe into the conservative male pool.

Your self-serving fiction is ignoring the many closeted conservative gay men (“The RNC is Grindr’s Super Bowl” - Grindr exec), the young evangelical teen conservatives who are saving themselves for marriage, the large numbers of conservative incels gooning to AI p0rn in the basement and whining about how feminism has “ruined” women, the angry divorced guys, the never-married 40 year olds who think they can still pull 19 year olds. And then you have the woman-hating conservatives that want nothing to do with any women. As for liberal women secretly yearning for conservative men, that’s a right wing male fantasy.

There are tons of articles about right wing men having trouble finding girlfriends, but you never hear left wing men complaining about the loneliness epidemic.