Maybe it would be a good thing if Trump limited international students at t100 schools?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m in favor of the international students. Every single white kid I know that went to HYP, with a few exceptions, went into either Finance, Law or Consulting. These things do nothing to further society.

Says the Asian STEM parent obsessed about an Ivy for their chil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be a good thing if the top US schools educated and prepared more US students? Is what's happening at harvard a blessing in disguise?

Maybe the government should limit the number of international students at all top schools. Getting in and the cost of attending is just too much.

NO!
-Left leaning moderate who does not want the government dictating every decision!

Then stop grabbing our tax dollars!

Tax dollars that pay for research to cure cancer or Alzheimers. Are you pro-cancer?

The ignorance of the PPs on here and Americans in general on how federal dollar support research that benefits everyone is depressing. Absolutely awful.

Has anyone with experience and credentials written an opinion piece for newspapers about the value of federal dollars for medical and scientific research at U.S. universities to explain how it works and benefits our society? The people who need to read it probably won’t but there’s a real lack of understanding because of all the disinformation.

Yes, there have been many articles, but like you said, the people who need to read it, won't.

Those same “credentialed” journos pretended they didn’t know Biden had dementia for four years. They have earned ZERO credibility.

How about the same “real American” voters who returned and obviously mentally ill and cognitively impaired grifters to office? Talk about no credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How about 5%?

I'd say 15%. Generous but not at the level of 20-30% at many good schools that strong domestic students would love to attend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about 5%?

I'd say 15%. Generous but not at the level of 20-30% at many good schools that strong domestic students would love to attend.

No more than 5%. I think 15% is ridiculous. I was shocked when I heard some schools have 20%.

[Anonymous]

All international students should pass a more rigorous background check and they should staple a green card to every international PhD.

We don't produce enough smart people domestically to power the invocation factory of the world. Bring in the smartest Asians, Africans, Europeans, Latin Americans to become the best and brightest Americans. We already do a background check but we should do a better job of that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All international students should pass a more rigorous background check and they should staple a green card to every international PhD.

We don't produce enough smart people domestically to power the invocation factory of the world. Bring in the smartest Asians, Africans, Europeans, Latin Americans to become the best and brightest Americans. We already do a background check but we should do a better job of that

I might be able to get behind that if we crack down on all of the very generic h1b workers brought in every year. Most are far from the best or brightest.