Just look at all those “policies” that he will enact. Harris has no policy compared to this clear outline from the mouth of Trump! |
The bolded is gaslighting. Having a different "political view" is one thing. But when one side literally want to subjugate an entire gender to second class status, when one side is literally saying that using the US miltiary against the other side is ok, you lose the argument. You want to go back to discussing what the tax rates should be or how much aid we should be giving to one country or another, then great, but that is not where we are as a country at this moment. |
Yeah, not embracing fascism and “tear it all down” as a “different view”. Not happening. |
See this is where you go off the rails and no one takes you seriously. No one wants to "literally subjugate an entire gender to second class status." That is just silly. Not even sure what you are talking about. Maybe abortion? If so, wanting to protect human life, half of whom are female, has nothing to do with subjugating women -- to the contrary, it is actually protecting millions of female babies. Also, you need to stop taking Trump so seriously when he is riffing. Remember, he has already been President for four years. Everything was fine. In fact, it was a darn good presidency considering he dealt with the Democrat's Russia hoax for three years and then Covid hit. The other candidate has flipped 180 on numerous issues, so we have no clue what she actually believes. That is far scarier, especially in these uncertain times -- remember that the world was pretty much as peace during Trump's presidency. |
|
Your logic is truly astounding. |
Right, and your view about abortion is YOUR opinion. Hence, this is policy difference as I said. It doesn't translate into "your side literally wants to subjugate women." That is just your opinion and clear hyberbole. Wanting to protect human life is not subjugating women. If it was men who got pregnant, my view wouldn't change one iota. |
We most want to rid ourselves of the uncertainties that come with inadequate leadership in The White House. Harris gives a chance at a return to an Obama level of acceptable leadership. Trump had the chance already and failed miserably. |
This is all so odd/surreal. Whatever age-related issues he's having are progressive. This elderly man is unfit. Why are his supporters only focused on winning/the next three weeks and not on the state of his mental agility over the next four years?? Are people this daft? What planet are we on? |
For some, it's just the definition of insanity. Keep voting for elderly, unfit people thinking they are the best options to lead the most powerful country in the world, the elderly people fail miserably, and then we just nominate more elderly people at the next opportunity. What doesn't work, doesn't work. Out with the old (looking at you Donald and Joe) and in with the competent (Harris). |
They are talking about tracking and arresting women for crossing state lines. You will excuse me if I don't feel like giving them the benefit of the doubt here. And the fact that he spouts so much egregious cr** while "riffing" - as you put it - does not give me any confidence! It is in fact infuriating that this person cannot say ANYTHING clearly - and yet, we've gotten the point! Women are sub-human to these people. And no it's not f****** hyperbole. |