Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now do this same analysis for Vance. Because he is very likely to be president within 18months of a Trump win.
Ok, thanks. I think Vance scores almost the same as Trump. I think he will probably be better on the economy, but I admit I really don't have enough information to say. I will say that I appreciated Vance's responses on abortion during the VP debate. It was the first time that I've heard a Republican candidate speak with some empathy about the situation of the mother. I believe he is probably aligned with me in thinking that an Aristotelian Natural Law status of "personhood" occurs sometime between Day 1 and Month 8, and that we need to follow a European model of meeting in the middle and putting this behind us.
Except that Vance, like Harris and Walz, can reasonably be trusted to remain in adequate mental health to serve in the most powerful position in the world until 2029. Trump and Biden can not be trusted because they have already shown that they aren't up for this job 24/7. Are you in good enough mental health to understand this very, very important difference?
Thanks again for the feedback, but this seems to be devolving into bickering, and I hate to repeat myself.
I've watched Trump clips from when he was a big star in the 1980s. I've seen live 'season finale' episodes of him on The Apprentice a couple decades later. I just now went back and streamed his appearance on the FOX morning show, today, sitting there and chatting during an early morning appearance after a late night charity event. I don't see any difference in mannerisms over the decades. He seemed very sharp, relaxed and happy this morning. I have elderly parents in their 90s and one is as sharp as a tack, and the other is starting to become forgetful. Age affects people differently. I'm just not seeing it when I tune in to live, unedited events like last night and this morning.