Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ian whiffin from cellebrite is testifying about the cell phone data and when the internet search actually happened. Spoiler alert it wasn't at 2:30 am!!!!! Boom!!!!

I don’t understand the ambiguity around this and why there isn’t someone from Apple testifying about how the program works?

For me there is a single piece of crucial info: He was alive at 12:32 per Ian W's testimony about the watch activity. And we know from the previous trial that his bluetooth disconnected from KR's car at 12:30. So that means he was checking his watch, alive, on the lawn two minutes after she left. Presumably if gravely injured he's not opening his watch to check on his messages casually and then walking around a little and locking his watch without trying to get some help. Karen's phone connects to his house wifi at 12:36 so the timeline (left before 12:30) checks out in terms of her having left before that phone check by John.

That's not what he said today.

I watched the video with PowerPoint so not sure what you mean.

[Anonymous]

Who is Karen Read?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is Karen Read?

Some swinger who ran into her husband at night and killed him. Because she looks good and criminal defense attorneys made total mockeries of most trials, she’ll get off the hook.

She should go hookup with Luigi. So should their attorneys.

[Anonymous]

All defendants need to do is hope some tv shows get made about them and then claim to be a victim and keep appealing and mistrialing.

[Anonymous]

It helps when the real victim is dead. Just take over the narrative however your lawyer tells you to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is Karen Read?

Shes a murderer she killed her cop boyfriend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ian whiffin from cellebrite is testifying about the cell phone data and when the internet search actually happened. Spoiler alert it wasn't at 2:30 am!!!!! Boom!!!!

So the only Google search that auto deleted itself is the “hos long” search at 2:28? Out of her thousands of Google searches?

Why did JOK’s phone record steps while driving up and down the hills of Canton but Karen’s didn’t?

Ian whiffin from cellebrite testified that no searches were deleted. NONE. Save your sanity PP WATCH THE LIVE COURT PROCEEDINGS or DVR it. Answer your own stupid questions with the live testimony. No one should have to do YOUR research for YOU.

Wow get a life, loser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she was blackout drunk and honestly has no idea whether she hit him or not.

The problem is so was he and everyone else at that party. We will never know what actually happened.

Read that she was .09 and limit is .08. That’s not blackout.

She was .09 when tested, which was at 9 am. Given the range of alcohol metabolism, this means that at the time of the events she had a BAC of 0.135-0.292. That IS blackout drunk.

[Anonymous]

Interesting to see this thread flooded with anti Karen Read comments given how badly the investigation was botched. It almost feels like a negative PR push against her. Even if she did hit him (note: the commonwealth has yet to convince me JOK was even hit by a car), she was gifted a lifetime’s worth of reasonable doubt when they put Proctor in charge of the investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to see this thread flooded with anti Karen Read comments given how badly the investigation was botched. It almost feels like a negative PR push against her. Even if she did hit him (note: the commonwealth has yet to convince me JOK was even hit by a car), she was gifted a lifetime’s worth of reasonable doubt when they put Proctor in charge of the investigation.

Agree. Unlike some of the posters, I’m not invested in the outcome of this case. But I understand reasonable doubt, and this case is a textbook example of it. Saying someone is “not guilty” in a court of law does not mean they are innocent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to see this thread flooded with anti Karen Read comments given how badly the investigation was botched. It almost feels like a negative PR push against her. Even if she did hit him (note: the commonwealth has yet to convince me JOK was even hit by a car), she was gifted a lifetime’s worth of reasonable doubt when they put Proctor in charge of the investigation.

Cool. The “make a mockery of the court procedures” strategy gets another selfish, immoral, hazardous alcoholic murderer off the hook.

[Anonymous]

Can you imagine if public school teachers and admins were in charge of collecting evidence, arresting people or following procedures!? lol.

We’d all be dead from total crime anarchy.

Instead we have public union police, investigators, and prosecutors doing it. And not so well.

Thank gawd for social media and mockumentaries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to see this thread flooded with anti Karen Read comments given how badly the investigation was botched. It almost feels like a negative PR push against her. Even if she did hit him (note: the commonwealth has yet to convince me JOK was even hit by a car), she was gifted a lifetime’s worth of reasonable doubt when they put Proctor in charge of the investigation.

Agree. Unlike some of the posters, I’m not invested in the outcome of this case. But I understand reasonable doubt, and this case is a textbook example of it. Saying someone is “not guilty” in a court of law does not mean they are innocent.

Yes we know.

Thus any of your loved ones could be deliberately hit by a track tonight from their pissed off romantic partner and not haven’t consequences.

Well is that him with the hoodie or mask or not?! Could be anyone!?

Was that her drunk driving at him or not? Oh my, don’t know!

Are his bruises from the truck or the bridge or falling on ricks? Oh my! Don’t know.

Is that his diary notebook and note or was it not logged in correctly so who cares!? Not the victims kids or family…

[Anonymous]

No common sense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to see this thread flooded with anti Karen Read comments given how badly the investigation was botched. It almost feels like a negative PR push against her. Even if she did hit him (note: the commonwealth has yet to convince me JOK was even hit by a car), she was gifted a lifetime’s worth of reasonable doubt when they put Proctor in charge of the investigation.

Cool. The “make a mockery of the court procedures” strategy gets another selfish, immoral, hazardous alcoholic murderer off the hook.

Yes, Karen Read is a selfish alcoholic, as are all the people in the crowd present that night. But the court made a mockery of itself with the help of law enforcement, and is a waste of time and resources given a jury already found her innocent of two out of three charges.