I equate all this to travel sports. You could play on a b-team that has good instruction and play a lot. But a top half b-team player isn’t going to play a lot as a bottom half A player. But folks want to “prestige” of having their kid play A team, because they assume better instruction or that paid coaches are better. But, it’s the b team players who work on the fundamentals likely make their HS team over some of the A players. For college admissions, it’s better be a top half player at your school than a lower half player at a “prestigious” school. |
Because public school guidance counselors don't give great advice, often. |
|
| Neither do paid colleges counselors and privates. Take responsibility and work with your child and use common sense! |
You know how Asian Am kids are compared to each other? IB kids from the same area are looked at as a group, and compared wthin the group. If UMD looked at all MD students in one bucket, something like 80% (ok, maybe not 80% but some other ridiculously high numbeer) of the kids would be from MoCo . I heard a UMD admission officer say that.. "UMD is not the University of Montgomery County".. ie, we look at all MoCo students as a group, and compare the MCPS students with each other. I don't know where ^^PP student is from but in MCPS IB program, 1440 would not be very high. It's below the median (1500), and many have a 3.8+ GPA, unweighted. You can imagine what their weighted GPA looks like. If that ^^PP's kid is from MoCo, that's the type of scores that kid is competing with -- 1500+, 4.2+ GPA, weighted. Maybe they are from a different county/state, but in MCPS, a lot of IB students usually have much higher scores/grades. |
DP I would agree that a low score doesn't necessarily reflect intelligence and definitely not capability or diligence. I totally get that some kids are not great test takers, and that doesn't mean they are not bright, excellent students. However, you'll never convince me that near perfect or perfect scores don't signal intelligence in some fashion. Being able to figure out how to take tests well is a form of intelligence. Doesn't mean brilliance in all ways, or indicate how hardworking a student is, or that a kid has a lot of common sense or creativity or is organized. But I've never known a kid among my children's friends who scored super high on standardized tests and was not super bright. I've known teachers who have made extra efforts to reach kids who did so-so or even poorly in class but then scored in the 99th percentile on tests, because the tests made them realize there was something preventing those kids from reaching their potential. |
Florida. |
No, parochial HS |
Yes, Catholic HS |
The word is privilege. |
I'm not the person whose kid you are denigrating, but you are a pompous ass. |
Hahaha - the word is arrogance |
OK, that puts the weighted GPA in context. How many AP classes? Did your DD apply to a specific major or just general Arts and Sciences? It's just hard to figure out exactly why your DD didn't get in without more specifics. Many of the Catholic high schools in the D.C. suburbs have highly tracked classes. Was your DD on the highest track? Do you know how many students from DD's class applied? What kind of yield rate does the high school have for UMD? (Do students generally use UMD as a backup or do a high percentage actually attend if admitted?). I'm trying to figure out if your DD is a shining star on the highest track of a big Catholic high school or if DD attends a small Catholic HS with few AP's. If DD had the opportunity to take many AP's but didn't, that's a red flag. Ditto for an IB program, if that's available. |
PS, I really am not trying to be mean. Your DD obviously has strong intelligence (1400) and a good work ethic (3.7uw), but we don't have enough details to know if your child has been screwed over by UMD or not. She has a lot going for her and will live a productive life, regardless. |
This shows how broken the college system is. In my day, you went to the best college you could get into. Now, it's the best college your parents can afford. The "top" colleges are definitely not getting the top students in the US, not by a long shot. My kid ought to go to a top SLAC or Ivy, yet she's going in-state. She didn't even apply to any SLACs that didn't offer merit. We haven't heard from all the schools yet, but based on my older kids' results, no private college will offer enough merit aid to make the cost of attending equal to in-state costs. DH and I both went to Ivies, but it's in-state college for our kids. |