RW vs LW news

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The lengths the “liberal” media will go to in order to bury Democratic candidates.

+1

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile from the right: actually fake news

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile from the right: actually fake news

Real local news publisher Gannett is taking money to distribute this bullshit.
https://www.stltoday.com/opinion/editorial/editorial-its-obviously-fake-news-but-a-real-news-outlet-takes-money-to-publish-it/article_b33260ce-df2e-59d8-a3f3-e9c697be52f4.html

[Anonymous]

I’m glad someone sees what the media, RW and “LW,” are up to.

Actually it looks like most people are aware of what the corporate media is trying to do to us.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

These people call themselves a news network

[Anonymous]

There is no liberal media.

This is tweeted by Doug J. Balloon, aka NYTimes Pitchbot, but the tweeted image is actually from the NYT.

If you’re both sidesing the actual fascism of the GOP with the “fascism” of the Democrats consisting of the fevered beliefs of right wing fools, you’re pro fascism and anti-democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I'm not surprised that Republicans don't trust mainstream media. That's why they have to turn to Newsmax, OANN, Parler, Truth Social, etc, to hear things that conform to their bizarre and blissfully fact-free worldview. It's also not surprising that Independents don't trust the mainstream media, because media is constantly drawing false equivalences between literal insurrectionists and people who think that racism exists and is bad.

Ari Fleisher has drank the kool-aid, though, so it's no surprise that he has it completely wrong. The mainstream media isn't out of touch with America. Republicans are out of touch with reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad someone sees what the media, RW and “LW,” are up to.

Actually it looks like most people are aware of what the corporate media is trying to do to us.

I love the Smartless podcast, but they have no business interviewing the president.

[Anonymous]

Meeting with Dylan Mulvany but not major news outlets doesn’t seem like a winning move. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11348505/amp/Biden-slams-GOP-trying-ban-sex-changes-children-interview-trans-TikTok-activist.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meeting with Dylan Mulvany but not major news outlets doesn’t seem like a winning move. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11348505/amp/Biden-slams-GOP-trying-ban-sex-changes-children-interview-trans-TikTok-activist.html

He had an interview on NBC yesterday.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna53409

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Left wing media: Takes a centrist stance, "bothsides" on political positions, hated by both sides, falls all over itself, apologizes and retracts and offers a correction whenever it's actually solidly proven wrong.

Right wing media: Hard right, completely shameless, unrepentant, unapologetic, busted for lying thousands of times, but virtually never retracts, never corrects the record, never apologizes, unless they are hit with a multimillion dollar lawsuit like Newsmax.

If both sides are upset with the mainstream media, then that media is doing its job correctly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing media: Takes a centrist stance, "bothsides" on political positions, hated by both sides, falls all over itself, apologizes and retracts and offers a correction whenever it's actually solidly proven wrong.

Right wing media: Hard right, completely shameless, unrepentant, unapologetic, busted for lying thousands of times, but virtually never retracts, never corrects the record, never apologizes, unless they are hit with a multimillion dollar lawsuit like Newsmax.

If both sides are upset with the mainstream media, then that media is doing its job correctly.

If the GOP’s upset is simply working the refs because they want 100% positive coverage and don’t want the truth reported and the Democrats are being both sided with literal fascists, no, the media isn’t doing its job correctly.

The media consistently oversampling Republicans and interviewing Republicans and then labeling those people as Democrats is not “doing its job correctly”. Try giving this thread an actual read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing media: Takes a centrist stance, "bothsides" on political positions, hated by both sides, falls all over itself, apologizes and retracts and offers a correction whenever it's actually solidly proven wrong.

Right wing media: Hard right, completely shameless, unrepentant, unapologetic, busted for lying thousands of times, but virtually never retracts, never corrects the record, never apologizes, unless they are hit with a multimillion dollar lawsuit like Newsmax.

If both sides are upset with the mainstream media, then that media is doing its job correctly.

If the GOP’s upset is simply working the refs because they want 100% positive coverage and don’t want the truth reported and the Democrats are being both sided with literal fascists, no, the media isn’t doing its job correctly.

The media consistently oversampling Republicans and interviewing Republicans and then labeling those people as Democrats is not “doing its job correctly”. Try giving this thread an actual read.

It isn’t the media’s job to make anyone happy. DIt should be reporting objectively. It absolutely should be upsetting both sides. You sound upset that it isn’t labeling people according to your definitions. You sound like someone who labels people supporting Dems financially and electorally at the polls as GOPers/Trumpers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing media: Takes a centrist stance, "bothsides" on political positions, hated by both sides, falls all over itself, apologizes and retracts and offers a correction whenever it's actually solidly proven wrong.

Right wing media: Hard right, completely shameless, unrepentant, unapologetic, busted for lying thousands of times, but virtually never retracts, never corrects the record, never apologizes, unless they are hit with a multimillion dollar lawsuit like Newsmax.

If both sides are upset with the mainstream media, then that media is doing its job correctly.

If the GOP’s upset is simply working the refs because they want 100% positive coverage and don’t want the truth reported and the Democrats are being both sided with literal fascists, no, the media isn’t doing its job correctly.

The media consistently oversampling Republicans and interviewing Republicans and then labeling those people as Democrats is not “doing its job correctly”. Try giving this thread an actual read.

It isn’t the media’s job to make anyone happy. DIt should be reporting objectively. It absolutely should be upsetting both sides. You sound upset that it isn’t labeling people according to your definitions. You sound like someone who labels people supporting Dems financially and electorally at the polls as GOPers/Trumpers?

It’s curious then that all their reporting is slanted pro-GOP in order to make the shrieking harpies of the GOP happy. It’s not upsetting both sides. It’s GOP friendly coverage that obscures the truth about how bat crap crazy the GOP is and obscuring the threat the GOP poses to the existence of the USA.

Seriously, read the thread.