I would consider 60k on the lower end of middle class especially if it was a one-parent household. I'd consider 168k on the upper end of middle class. Also those are just medians, so there are plenty of people on either side. Which means plenty of black families with an HHI above 60 and plenty of white families with an HHI under 168k, and I would consider most of the families in between as middle class. That's also all households, not limited to households with kids, which is a wildcard and it's hard to know how that would change these numbers. I am very confused by the arguments on here that there are very few middle class families in DCPS. It seems transparently false, based on both the statistics and my personal experience. Like I'm still reeling from the person who posted the they believe the "median" income for families at their Ward 6 elementary is 300k, which I actually do not think is possible even at a school like Maury or Brent where yes there does tend to be a higher percentage of wealthy parents. If there are people who really believe that, it is absolutely impacting the culture of the school and the way an integrated (racially and socioeconomically) school will operate. |
I hear you on the “middle class families exist in DCPS” point. I agree that some of the rhetoric on here (“there are very few middle class families in DCPS,” or claims like a $300k median at a neighborhood elementary) can get exaggerated and ends up warping how people talk about integrated schools and what’s realistic. As a Black parent, I’ll also be transparent about where my own family sits. We tend to think of ourselves as upper-middle class, but by DC income/wealth standards we’re probably “upper class” on paper. I mention that only because it shapes what options are actually available to us—and it also shapes what tradeoffs we’re willing to make for our kids. In principle, I genuinely want more schools that are truly integrated racially and socioeconomically and are well run—schools where the floor is solid, the ceiling is high, and kids from different backgrounds can thrive together. I want that to be normal. But speaking purely as a practical matter, we found it’s hard to get that model right at scale in DC in a way that worked for what our kids needed day-to-day. We did the diverse public/charter route in Ward 6 for years. There were many good people and good intentions. But the wider the spread of needs in a school, the more “triage” can become the dominant operating mode—behavior management, remediation, uneven standards, and a lot of energy spent just keeping the system functioning. That’s not a moral critique; if anything, those schools have the hardest job. It’s just a recognition that a school with an “easier job”—a tighter band of behavioral needs, more stable expectations, and fewer competing crises—is often more able to deliver coherent instruction and consistent accountability. In our case, that kind of school simply happened to be a private/parochial school. I don’t take that as a universal statement about public vs. private; it’s just what worked for our family. And in hindsight, I’m honestly a little surprised we stayed as long as we did—many Black families we know who are similarly situated socioeconomically made the move to private/parochial much earlier. I still want DC to have more integrated public schools that can pull it off at scale. We just couldn’t keep gambling on that timeline for our own kids. |
There are a ton of trolls on this thread, like the one insisting that there are $7mil and lots of $5mil houses in bounds for Janney, even though a quick google search disproves that silliness. |
| So, back to the question at hand: how do the policy people at OSSE or DCPS define "intergrated." |
And how much of their definition is confounded by outcome measures like test scores. |
Technically Key and Mann here, but same difference: https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/2927-44th-St-NW-20016/home/113744981 https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/5070-Millwood-Ln-NW-20016/home/9943109 https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/4869-Glenbrook-Rd-NW-20016/home/9946672 https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/4433-Cathedral-Ave-NW-20016/home/9956065 |
How is this relevant? People living in such expensive places do not use DCPS. |
+1 I work for a large law firm in DC. The partners making the kind of money that would enable them to buy one of these house universally send their kids to private school OR live in a select few suburban districts, not DCPS. The only lawyers that send kids to DCPS at my firm are associates, but they don't make enough to afford houses like that. They might one day, and if they do, they will move their kids to private. The Venn diagram is two separate circles. DCPS and public charters are for poor to upper middle class people, and everyone in between. But not wealthy folks. |
It’s actually more accurate than that if you assume all white are not at risk (and don’t make assumptions about other race). If you assume 50 white not at risk, you’re probably wrong twice (4% B|A). Same number of black at risk, you’re wrong 17.5 times (35% B|A). That’s basically 80% accuracy. |
Counterpoint: half of lit consulting is at YY |
What is "lit consulting"? |
Curious about this Venn diagram where "not wealthy folks" live in the same school zone as folks in $7 million homes. |
Because not every home in that school zone is a 6 bedroom, 6 bathroom SFH with a pool. There are not really poor people living IB for Mann or Key, but there are UMC people whose homes didn't cost anywhere near that much. And the people whose homes do cost that much don't send their kids to Mann or Key. |
Accuracy is dependent on the size of each group in the overall population you're looking at. The only reasonable rule of thumb you can make is white = not at risk. With any other racial group, there's a decent chance you will be wrong. Why be wrong 12-35% of the time when you could just stop assuming class based on race altogether? |
Hard to buy a home for Key or Mann for less than $2.5 million. UMC people cannot afford the mortgage on a $2 million home (it's about $13,000 per month assuming you put down 20 percent). |