Integration and DC Schools -- A high priority? Yay or nay?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The income distribution for dcps public school students is not bimodal. There is a large number of economically at-risk students and then there are students spread across just about every single income step above that all the way up to very wealthy. It is a pretty wide spectrum - lots of not at-risk but mostly just getting by families, lots of true middle class families, lots of economically secure but 150k does not go so far in major urban areas type families. Lots of variations in the educational status of the parent(s). Lots of variations in things like housing costs.


This. The people who think it's just some very poor families and then everyone else is very well off are just very ignorant (and likely only interact with families in their same socioeconomic position and therefore don't think about or consider that anyone else exists).


Or they can look at the distribution of income in DC from every source, see the barbell and make the appropriate inference.


I haven't seen a single chart showing this barbell referenced.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The income distribution for dcps public school students is not bimodal. There is a large number of economically at-risk students and then there are students spread across just about every single income step above that all the way up to very wealthy. It is a pretty wide spectrum - lots of not at-risk but mostly just getting by families, lots of true middle class families, lots of economically secure but 150k does not go so far in major urban areas type families. Lots of variations in the educational status of the parent(s). Lots of variations in things like housing costs.


This. The people who think it's just some very poor families and then everyone else is very well off are just very ignorant (and likely only interact with families in their same socioeconomic position and therefore don't think about or consider that anyone else exists).


Or they can look at the distribution of income in DC from every source, see the barbell and make the appropriate inference.


I haven't seen a single chart showing this barbell referenced.


Got my cleats on to go to wherever you put the new post

https://ggwash.org/view/41080/heres-incomes-have-changed-in-dc-since-2000


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here's some on incomes in DC. https://www.dcfpi.org/all/inequality-remained-extreme-in-2024-as-dc-backslid-on-poverty/

The median income of $60,591 for Black households (statistically unchanged from 2023) was just over one-third of the $168,800 median household income for white, non-Hispanic households (also statistically unchanged from 2023).

The discussion about middle class families is interesting, because it seems to depend on what income levels make you 'middle class.' The poverty line here is supposedly in the $30K range. So $60K median puts black families in that range. The white household median income puts them in the top quarter of household income in the U.S. (above $165K).


I would consider 60k on the lower end of middle class especially if it was a one-parent household. I'd consider 168k on the upper end of middle class. Also those are just medians, so there are plenty of people on either side. Which means plenty of black families with an HHI above 60 and plenty of white families with an HHI under 168k, and I would consider most of the families in between as middle class. That's also all households, not limited to households with kids, which is a wildcard and it's hard to know how that would change these numbers.

I am very confused by the arguments on here that there are very few middle class families in DCPS. It seems transparently false, based on both the statistics and my personal experience. Like I'm still reeling from the person who posted the they believe the "median" income for families at their Ward 6 elementary is 300k, which I actually do not think is possible even at a school like Maury or Brent where yes there does tend to be a higher percentage of wealthy parents. If there are people who really believe that, it is absolutely impacting the culture of the school and the way an integrated (racially and socioeconomically) school will operate.


There are a ton of trolls on this thread, like the one insisting that there are $7mil and lots of $5mil houses in bounds for Janney, even though a quick google search disproves that silliness.


Technically Key and Mann here, but same difference:

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/2927-44th-St-NW-20016/home/113744981

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/5070-Millwood-Ln-NW-20016/home/9943109

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/4869-Glenbrook-Rd-NW-20016/home/9946672

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/4433-Cathedral-Ave-NW-20016/home/9956065


How is this relevant? People living in such expensive places do not use DCPS.


+1 I work for a large law firm in DC. The partners making the kind of money that would enable them to buy one of these house universally send their kids to private school OR live in a select few suburban districts, not DCPS.

The only lawyers that send kids to DCPS at my firm are associates, but they don't make enough to afford houses like that. They might one day, and if they do, they will move their kids to private.

The Venn diagram is two separate circles. DCPS and public charters are for poor to upper middle class people, and everyone in between. But not wealthy folks.


There are quite a few kids of law firm partners at our local Hill ES. If you live on the Hill, most big name private schools are not worth the commute in ES and lots of (even wealthy) folks think CHDS isn’t worth the difference for ES, especially if you have multiple kids. Maybe it’s different if Beauvoir is next door?

Now I agree that those kids are not heading to SH, and certainly not to EH or Jefferson, but elementary school? They definitely are.


I think there are lots of very wealthy people sending their kids to Mann and Key, but they switch to private for middle and high school. I think the number of ultra high net worth families at JR, for example, is 0.


You would be wrong. We are a high net worth (7-figure HHI) family and have kids at JR and Deal. We toured different private schools at various points in our kids’ education and have always found the public school kids to be just as impressive as their peers in the private schools. We saw no reason to make the switch when our kids are happy and thriving where they are. We are also big believers in public education and were uncomfortable with the idea of paying $50k a year when the main benefit seemed to be just making sure your kid was only around other rich people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The income distribution for dcps public school students is not bimodal. There is a large number of economically at-risk students and then there are students spread across just about every single income step above that all the way up to very wealthy. It is a pretty wide spectrum - lots of not at-risk but mostly just getting by families, lots of true middle class families, lots of economically secure but 150k does not go so far in major urban areas type families. Lots of variations in the educational status of the parent(s). Lots of variations in things like housing costs.


This. The people who think it's just some very poor families and then everyone else is very well off are just very ignorant (and likely only interact with families in their same socioeconomic position and therefore don't think about or consider that anyone else exists).


Or they can look at the distribution of income in DC from every source, see the barbell and make the appropriate inference.


I haven't seen a single chart showing this barbell referenced.


Got my cleats on to go to wherever you put the new post

https://ggwash.org/view/41080/heres-incomes-have-changed-in-dc-since-2000




While interesting, two things:

1) Those graphs are 10 years old. It's not a big deal, you can pull the more recent census data and it shows similar trends, but it might have been nice to go ahead and do that. And,

2) While this does show a barbell distribution for households in DC, it does not show a barbell distribution for families in DC, nor public school families in DC, nor public school families at specific schools. Not every household has kids, and not ever household with kids sends their kids to public school. This particularly impacts households on the right side of the barbell -- while you can assume that every family (or nearly every) under a certain threshold sends their kids to public school (because they cannot afford private nor do they have the resources to homeschool), you cannot make this assumption about the highest income households, many of whom will choose private. What percent? No idea, but it's more than zero. Which means that for public school families specifically, this may be more of a one sided barbell, with an inverse chart that would show income distribution for private school families.

And on a school by school basis, there are even more variables. Even if you could show that public school families had a barbell distribution in DC (something that has not been shown yet), this is across the entire system. Specific schools have different distributions based on neighborhood and lottery patterns. A lot of schools are majority at risk, including some schools where the number is over 90%, and those schools absorb a lot of the students on the left side of the barbell. There may be a handful that have a majority of families over say 250k, but I think for that you are talking about a TINY number of upper NW schools in very wealthy neighborhoods with major IB buy in, absorbing kids at that end of the barbell. Private schools also absorb a lot of those kids.

What's left? Middle class kids. Lots of public schools in DC are full of middle class kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here's some on incomes in DC. https://www.dcfpi.org/all/inequality-remained-extreme-in-2024-as-dc-backslid-on-poverty/

The median income of $60,591 for Black households (statistically unchanged from 2023) was just over one-third of the $168,800 median household income for white, non-Hispanic households (also statistically unchanged from 2023).

The discussion about middle class families is interesting, because it seems to depend on what income levels make you 'middle class.' The poverty line here is supposedly in the $30K range. So $60K median puts black families in that range. The white household median income puts them in the top quarter of household income in the U.S. (above $165K).


I would consider 60k on the lower end of middle class especially if it was a one-parent household. I'd consider 168k on the upper end of middle class. Also those are just medians, so there are plenty of people on either side. Which means plenty of black families with an HHI above 60 and plenty of white families with an HHI under 168k, and I would consider most of the families in between as middle class. That's also all households, not limited to households with kids, which is a wildcard and it's hard to know how that would change these numbers.

I am very confused by the arguments on here that there are very few middle class families in DCPS. It seems transparently false, based on both the statistics and my personal experience. Like I'm still reeling from the person who posted the they believe the "median" income for families at their Ward 6 elementary is 300k, which I actually do not think is possible even at a school like Maury or Brent where yes there does tend to be a higher percentage of wealthy parents. If there are people who really believe that, it is absolutely impacting the culture of the school and the way an integrated (racially and socioeconomically) school will operate.


There are a ton of trolls on this thread, like the one insisting that there are $7mil and lots of $5mil houses in bounds for Janney, even though a quick google search disproves that silliness.


Technically Key and Mann here, but same difference:

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/2927-44th-St-NW-20016/home/113744981

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/5070-Millwood-Ln-NW-20016/home/9943109

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/4869-Glenbrook-Rd-NW-20016/home/9946672

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/4433-Cathedral-Ave-NW-20016/home/9956065


How is this relevant? People living in such expensive places do not use DCPS.


+1 I work for a large law firm in DC. The partners making the kind of money that would enable them to buy one of these house universally send their kids to private school OR live in a select few suburban districts, not DCPS.

The only lawyers that send kids to DCPS at my firm are associates, but they don't make enough to afford houses like that. They might one day, and if they do, they will move their kids to private.

The Venn diagram is two separate circles. DCPS and public charters are for poor to upper middle class people, and everyone in between. But not wealthy folks.


There are quite a few kids of law firm partners at our local Hill ES. If you live on the Hill, most big name private schools are not worth the commute in ES and lots of (even wealthy) folks think CHDS isn’t worth the difference for ES, especially if you have multiple kids. Maybe it’s different if Beauvoir is next door?

Now I agree that those kids are not heading to SH, and certainly not to EH or Jefferson, but elementary school? They definitely are.


I think there are lots of very wealthy people sending their kids to Mann and Key, but they switch to private for middle and high school. I think the number of ultra high net worth families at JR, for example, is 0.


You would be wrong. We are a high net worth (7-figure HHI) family and have kids at JR and Deal. We toured different private schools at various points in our kids’ education and have always found the public school kids to be just as impressive as their peers in the private schools. We saw no reason to make the switch when our kids are happy and thriving where they are. We are also big believers in public education and were uncomfortable with the idea of paying $50k a year when the main benefit seemed to be just making sure your kid was only around other rich people.


But JR is the only boundary HS in the city where you would feel comfortable sending your kids, right? And Walls likely the only application HS. I buy that there are some very wealthy families in the JR pyramid, and that some of them plus maybe some from Hardy and feeders send kids to Walls. I also assume DCI and Latin absorb some wealthy families, BASIS also. And I know for a fact there are some wealthy black families who send their kids to Banneker or would be comfortable sending kids there in the future. But that's it. I don't know wealthy families comfortable with any other public pyramids in the city. So it's really a limited number of public schools where rich people are willing to send their kids. Even in neighborhoods with lots of homes selling for over a million (Capitol Hill, Brookland, Shaw, etc.) you won't find any very wealthy families at the IB high school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here's some on incomes in DC. https://www.dcfpi.org/all/inequality-remained-extreme-in-2024-as-dc-backslid-on-poverty/

The median income of $60,591 for Black households (statistically unchanged from 2023) was just over one-third of the $168,800 median household income for white, non-Hispanic households (also statistically unchanged from 2023).

The discussion about middle class families is interesting, because it seems to depend on what income levels make you 'middle class.' The poverty line here is supposedly in the $30K range. So $60K median puts black families in that range. The white household median income puts them in the top quarter of household income in the U.S. (above $165K).


I would consider 60k on the lower end of middle class especially if it was a one-parent household. I'd consider 168k on the upper end of middle class. Also those are just medians, so there are plenty of people on either side. Which means plenty of black families with an HHI above 60 and plenty of white families with an HHI under 168k, and I would consider most of the families in between as middle class. That's also all households, not limited to households with kids, which is a wildcard and it's hard to know how that would change these numbers.

I am very confused by the arguments on here that there are very few middle class families in DCPS. It seems transparently false, based on both the statistics and my personal experience. Like I'm still reeling from the person who posted the they believe the "median" income for families at their Ward 6 elementary is 300k, which I actually do not think is possible even at a school like Maury or Brent where yes there does tend to be a higher percentage of wealthy parents. If there are people who really believe that, it is absolutely impacting the culture of the school and the way an integrated (racially and socioeconomically) school will operate.


There are a ton of trolls on this thread, like the one insisting that there are $7mil and lots of $5mil houses in bounds for Janney, even though a quick google search disproves that silliness.


Technically Key and Mann here, but same difference:

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/2927-44th-St-NW-20016/home/113744981

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/5070-Millwood-Ln-NW-20016/home/9943109

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/4869-Glenbrook-Rd-NW-20016/home/9946672

https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/4433-Cathedral-Ave-NW-20016/home/9956065


How is this relevant? People living in such expensive places do not use DCPS.


+1 I work for a large law firm in DC. The partners making the kind of money that would enable them to buy one of these house universally send their kids to private school OR live in a select few suburban districts, not DCPS.

The only lawyers that send kids to DCPS at my firm are associates, but they don't make enough to afford houses like that. They might one day, and if they do, they will move their kids to private.

The Venn diagram is two separate circles. DCPS and public charters are for poor to upper middle class people, and everyone in between. But not wealthy folks.


There are quite a few kids of law firm partners at our local Hill ES. If you live on the Hill, most big name private schools are not worth the commute in ES and lots of (even wealthy) folks think CHDS isn’t worth the difference for ES, especially if you have multiple kids. Maybe it’s different if Beauvoir is next door?

Now I agree that those kids are not heading to SH, and certainly not to EH or Jefferson, but elementary school? They definitely are.


I think there are lots of very wealthy people sending their kids to Mann and Key, but they switch to private for middle and high school. I think the number of ultra high net worth families at JR, for example, is 0.


You would be wrong. We are a high net worth (7-figure HHI) family and have kids at JR and Deal. We toured different private schools at various points in our kids’ education and have always found the public school kids to be just as impressive as their peers in the private schools. We saw no reason to make the switch when our kids are happy and thriving where they are. We are also big believers in public education and were uncomfortable with the idea of paying $50k a year when the main benefit seemed to be just making sure your kid was only around other rich people.


But JR is the only boundary HS in the city where you would feel comfortable sending your kids, right? And Walls likely the only application HS. I buy that there are some very wealthy families in the JR pyramid, and that some of them plus maybe some from Hardy and feeders send kids to Walls. I also assume DCI and Latin absorb some wealthy families, BASIS also. And I know for a fact there are some wealthy black families who send their kids to Banneker or would be comfortable sending kids there in the future. But that's it. I don't know wealthy families comfortable with any other public pyramids in the city. So it's really a limited number of public schools where rich people are willing to send their kids. Even in neighborhoods with lots of homes selling for over a million (Capitol Hill, Brookland, Shaw, etc.) you won't find any very wealthy families at the IB high school.


NP. You are correct. I will also say that PP above with the 7 figure income is an outlier at JR and not the norm. Families with that income are sending their kids to private.

Anonymous
Not necessarily. In some of the best suburban schools in this area you find children of 7-figure income families because parents didn't want them in the cocoon environment of private schools that are too diverse. You don't see these families in DC because public schools here aren't nearly as good. We know rich families who've moved from DC to MoCo for this reason.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not necessarily. In some of the best suburban schools in this area you find children of 7-figure income families because parents didn't want them in the cocoon environment of private schools that are too diverse. You don't see these families in DC because public schools here aren't nearly as good. We know rich families who've moved from DC to MoCo for this reason.


Meh my guess is they move because they want a more suburban lifestyle in general (bigger house and yard) and likely settled in McClean before they even had kids. But there is a subset of people who just prefer city living and have money and find JR to be just fine.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The income distribution for dcps public school students is not bimodal. There is a large number of economically at-risk students and then there are students spread across just about every single income step above that all the way up to very wealthy. It is a pretty wide spectrum - lots of not at-risk but mostly just getting by families, lots of true middle class families, lots of economically secure but 150k does not go so far in major urban areas type families. Lots of variations in the educational status of the parent(s). Lots of variations in things like housing costs.


This. The people who think it's just some very poor families and then everyone else is very well off are just very ignorant (and likely only interact with families in their same socioeconomic position and therefore don't think about or consider that anyone else exists).


Or they can look at the distribution of income in DC from every source, see the barbell and make the appropriate inference.


I haven't seen a single chart showing this barbell referenced.


Got my cleats on to go to wherever you put the new post

https://ggwash.org/view/41080/heres-incomes-have-changed-in-dc-since-2000




While interesting, two things:

1) Those graphs are 10 years old. It's not a big deal, you can pull the more recent census data and it shows similar trends, but it might have been nice to go ahead and do that. And,

2) While this does show a barbell distribution for households in DC, it does not show a barbell distribution for families in DC, nor public school families in DC, nor public school families at specific schools. Not every household has kids, and not ever household with kids sends their kids to public school. This particularly impacts households on the right side of the barbell -- while you can assume that every family (or nearly every) under a certain threshold sends their kids to public school (because they cannot afford private nor do they have the resources to homeschool), you cannot make this assumption about the highest income households, many of whom will choose private. What percent? No idea, but it's more than zero. Which means that for public school families specifically, this may be more of a one sided barbell, with an inverse chart that would show income distribution for private school families.

And on a school by school basis, there are even more variables. Even if you could show that public school families had a barbell distribution in DC (something that has not been shown yet), this is across the entire system. Specific schools have different distributions based on neighborhood and lottery patterns. A lot of schools are majority at risk, including some schools where the number is over 90%, and those schools absorb a lot of the students on the left side of the barbell. There may be a handful that have a majority of families over say 250k, but I think for that you are talking about a TINY number of upper NW schools in very wealthy neighborhoods with major IB buy in, absorbing kids at that end of the barbell. Private schools also absorb a lot of those kids.

What's left? Middle class kids. Lots of public schools in DC are full of middle class kids.


Seems pretty easy to look at the Title I data to see how many kids are middle class.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The income distribution for dcps public school students is not bimodal. There is a large number of economically at-risk students and then there are students spread across just about every single income step above that all the way up to very wealthy. It is a pretty wide spectrum - lots of not at-risk but mostly just getting by families, lots of true middle class families, lots of economically secure but 150k does not go so far in major urban areas type families. Lots of variations in the educational status of the parent(s). Lots of variations in things like housing costs.


This. The people who think it's just some very poor families and then everyone else is very well off are just very ignorant (and likely only interact with families in their same socioeconomic position and therefore don't think about or consider that anyone else exists).


Or they can look at the distribution of income in DC from every source, see the barbell and make the appropriate inference.


I haven't seen a single chart showing this barbell referenced.


Got my cleats on to go to wherever you put the new post

https://ggwash.org/view/41080/heres-incomes-have-changed-in-dc-since-2000




While interesting, two things:

1) Those graphs are 10 years old. It's not a big deal, you can pull the more recent census data and it shows similar trends, but it might have been nice to go ahead and do that. And,

2) While this does show a barbell distribution for households in DC, it does not show a barbell distribution for families in DC, nor public school families in DC, nor public school families at specific schools. Not every household has kids, and not ever household with kids sends their kids to public school. This particularly impacts households on the right side of the barbell -- while you can assume that every family (or nearly every) under a certain threshold sends their kids to public school (because they cannot afford private nor do they have the resources to homeschool), you cannot make this assumption about the highest income households, many of whom will choose private. What percent? No idea, but it's more than zero. Which means that for public school families specifically, this may be more of a one sided barbell, with an inverse chart that would show income distribution for private school families.

And on a school by school basis, there are even more variables. Even if you could show that public school families had a barbell distribution in DC (something that has not been shown yet), this is across the entire system. Specific schools have different distributions based on neighborhood and lottery patterns. A lot of schools are majority at risk, including some schools where the number is over 90%, and those schools absorb a lot of the students on the left side of the barbell. There may be a handful that have a majority of families over say 250k, but I think for that you are talking about a TINY number of upper NW schools in very wealthy neighborhoods with major IB buy in, absorbing kids at that end of the barbell. Private schools also absorb a lot of those kids.

What's left? Middle class kids. Lots of public schools in DC are full of middle class kids.


Seems pretty easy to look at the Title I data to see how many kids are middle class.


How? Title 1 data will only tell you if a kid is designated at risk. There's no reliable, statistical way to differentiate the socioeconomic status of any other kid in the system. "Not at risk" could mean a family with an HHI of 120k, or a family with an HHI of 500k. Same bucket. And you can't use race as a proxy for income except in broad buckets (income distribution in DC means that few white families are poor and few black families are high income, but they cross at middle class which means that group is racially diverse).

You can't even look at the Title 1 designation for telling you how many kids at a school are middle class. It depends on the income of the surrounding neighborhood, the current state of gentrification, availability of charters desirable to high income parents, and the reputation of the school among wealthier families. Some Title 1 schools have very few or zero UMC or wealthier families in their "not at risk" ranks. Others have quite a few UMC/wealthy families, which will become especially obvious in a few years when the school is no longer Title 1 (this is often the first sign that Title 1 status is going to go away -- buy in from high income families).

But this is only something you can observe and guess at based on perceived incomes and the culture of the school. There is no data on it. I don't think DCPS even collects income data on families outside of the at risk designation (which is linked to SNAP and TANF qualifications, or the student being unhoused or part of the foster care system -- hard data that doesn't requiring estimating or guessing at a family's income or finances). I don't know how you'd cross-section census data against the public school system either, because the census data doesn't get into utilization of public schools, much less whether a family is using an IB or OOB school, or a charter versus DCPS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not necessarily. In some of the best suburban schools in this area you find children of 7-figure income families because parents didn't want them in the cocoon environment of private schools that are too diverse. You don't see these families in DC because public schools here aren't nearly as good. We know rich families who've moved from DC to MoCo for this reason.


Meh my guess is they move because they want a more suburban lifestyle in general (bigger house and yard) and likely settled in McClean before they even had kids. But there is a subset of people who just prefer city living and have money and find JR to be just fine.
McClean might have some big houses and large lots [particularly outside the beltway]. But if you are starting with JR catchment, then how do you distinguish the suburban feeling around JR from moving a mile or two further out into MoCo? or moving into North Arlington which is potentially a better commute into Downtown?
Anonymous
Plessy
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Plessy


Somebody keeps sticking this case name in here like it's relevant.

We're way past formal separate but equal.

We're dealing with residential segregation, people voting with their feet (e.g., white and black flight), de facto segregation, the interaction between public schools, charters, and private schools, race, and class.

We're at a point where nothing can plausibly be done by the courts to fix the problem. The Supremes are UNDOING the Voting Rights Act before our eyes. Are they really going to say, DC, you get to have an all-Metro-area blind lottery and mass busing? No. And without those kinds of macro-solutions, we start to come up with more practical, smaller scale solutions.

So don't come around just writing the name "Plessy." Maybe I should just write "Milliken" and we can move on.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Plessy


Somebody keeps sticking this case name in here like it's relevant.

We're way past formal separate but equal.

We're dealing with residential segregation, people voting with their feet (e.g., white and black flight), de facto segregation, the interaction between public schools, charters, and private schools, race, and class.

We're at a point where nothing can plausibly be done by the courts to fix the problem. The Supremes are UNDOING the Voting Rights Act before our eyes. Are they really going to say, DC, you get to have an all-Metro-area blind lottery and mass busing? No. And without those kinds of macro-solutions, we start to come up with more practical, smaller scale solutions.

So don't come around just writing the name "Plessy." Maybe I should just write "Milliken" and we can move on.


DC spends a gargantuan amount of money on schools and yet has SO MANY schools where almost none of the kids are at grade level in anything. We have bigger fish to fry than academic arguments about integration.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not necessarily. In some of the best suburban schools in this area you find children of 7-figure income families because parents didn't want them in the cocoon environment of private schools that are too diverse. You don't see these families in DC because public schools here aren't nearly as good. We know rich families who've moved from DC to MoCo for this reason.


Meh my guess is they move because they want a more suburban lifestyle in general (bigger house and yard) and likely settled in McClean before they even had kids. But there is a subset of people who just prefer city living and have money and find JR to be just fine.
McClean might have some big houses and large lots [particularly outside the beltway]. But if you are starting with JR catchment, then how do you distinguish the suburban feeling around JR from moving a mile or two further out into MoCo? or moving into North Arlington which is potentially a better commute into Downtown?


I’m not an expert in the housing stock but I think it is easier and more affordable to get a house in MoCo than in NW DC. And MoCo has a lot of other suburban amenities too (access to sports and music classes etc).
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: