Trump’s Dementia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump already having a happy Memorial Day weekend here

F$&?! Moron. As usual.

[Anonymous]

He is so stupid and pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden set the bar so low. And Trump still isn’t anywhere close to Biden’s feebleness and confusion. He’s an idiot and he’s profoundly rude and obnoxious. But he’s always been like that. He’s certainly more active and takes many more questions than Biden ever did.

You've hit the nail on the head: that stupid people like you confuse physical activity with cognitive strength and physical weakness with cignitive deterioration.

There are many like you, since the average IQ is a 100

But the truth is that you've got to look beyond the physical activity, at what comes out of his mouth and the decisions he's making. They've both been bonkers-level madness.

Biden, for all his physical frailty, was never as cognitively impaired in office. I did not want him to run for President, let alone a second term. I heard Obama was against it from the beginning, and who knows him best than his own President he shared a White House with? But at no point in time was Biden at the Trump level of impulsive tariff-spewing, warmongering nonsense, TACO crazy, that Trump has been showing us every day.

And I wouldn’t even say Biden was physically frailer. He worked out five days a week. He didn’t have cankles or mysterious bruising. He didn’t drag his leg or struggle to walk in a straight line. He didn’t need a golf cart to haul him distances over 50 yards. He rode a bike while on vacation.

PP is confusing physical bulk with strength.

As for taking questions, Trump is a narcissist and a showman who is energized by an audience. What matters isn’t how many questions he takes, but how many he answers. Which is zero, because 1) he makes everything about himself 2) he wanders off on irrelevant tangents and grudges 3) any time a question isn’t flattering enough, he insults the reporter and threatens to remove their credentials.

PP is confusing speech with communication.

[Anonymous]

So what's it going to take? If frontotemporal dementia equals loss of inhibition, will he start revealing classified information in public?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden set the bar so low. And Trump still isn’t anywhere close to Biden’s feebleness and confusion. He’s an idiot and he’s profoundly rude and obnoxious. But he’s always been like that. He’s certainly more active and takes many more questions than Biden ever did.

You've hit the nail on the head: that stupid people like you confuse physical activity with cognitive strength and physical weakness with cignitive deterioration.

There are many like you, since the average IQ is a 100

But the truth is that you've got to look beyond the physical activity, at what comes out of his mouth and the decisions he's making. They've both been bonkers-level madness.

Biden, for all his physical frailty, was never as cognitively impaired in office. I did not want him to run for President, let alone a second term. I heard Obama was against it from the beginning, and who knows him best than his own President he shared a White House with? But at no point in time was Biden at the Trump level of impulsive tariff-spewing, warmongering nonsense, TACO crazy, that Trump has been showing us every day.

And I wouldn’t even say Biden was physically frailer. He worked out five days a week. He didn’t have cankles or mysterious bruising. He didn’t drag his leg or struggle to walk in a straight line. He didn’t need a golf cart to haul him distances over 50 yards. He rode a bike while on vacation.

PP is confusing physical bulk with strength.

As for taking questions, Trump is a narcissist and a showman who is energized by an audience. What matters isn’t how many questions he takes, but how many he answers. Which is zero, because 1) he makes everything about himself 2) he wanders off on irrelevant tangents and grudges 3) any time a question isn’t flattering enough, he insults the reporter and threatens to remove their credentials.

PP is confusing speech with communication.

You're correct. Unfortunately, the PP is a good example of how MAGA world views the issue. It's really sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what's it going to take? If frontotemporal dementia equals loss of inhibition, will he start revealing classified information in public?

He already has been. the whole bunker under the east wing was classified. The hosiptial and other amenities were classified. He is a walking national security disaster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden set the bar so low. And Trump still isn’t anywhere close to Biden’s feebleness and confusion. He’s an idiot and he’s profoundly rude and obnoxious. But he’s always been like that. He’s certainly more active and takes many more questions than Biden ever did.

“^^ cult member, trying to distort facts so his 'side' wins.”

I have no doubt that poster is being paid to agitate on Trump’s behalf. Slow day at the White House?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's it going to take? If frontotemporal dementia equals loss of inhibition, will he start revealing classified information in public?

He already has been. the whole bunker under the east wing was classified. The hosiptial and other amenities were classified. He is a walking national security disaster.

They already had a fully operational emergency room under the White House. Was that part of the East Wing that he tore out? What a shame if he ever needs it.

Not having a bunker should be incentive for him to not start a nuclear war.

[Anonymous]

Frankly, we do need a large indoor event space on White House grounds, and have needed it for decades. Large state dinners were never comfortable and some events had to be in outside tents, at the mercy of the weather.

So I’d rather that Trump get the furious Marie-Antoinette criticism, and that future Presidents, hopefully Democrat ones, make use of the room

Win-win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, we do need a large indoor event space on White House grounds, and have needed it for decades. Large state dinners were never comfortable and some events had to be in outside tents, at the mercy of the weather.

So I’d rather that Trump get the furious Marie-Antoinette criticism, and that future Presidents, hopefully Democrat ones, make use of the room

Win-win.

An event space is fine. An event space on the absurd scale that Trump is pursuing is idiotic. His plan is unsuitable for the site and inconsistent with the existing (historical) structures already there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, we do need a large indoor event space on White House grounds, and have needed it for decades. Large state dinners were never comfortable and some events had to be in outside tents, at the mercy of the weather.

So I’d rather that Trump get the furious Marie-Antoinette criticism, and that future Presidents, hopefully Democrat ones, make use of the room

Win-win.

We don't need what he is proposing.

[Anonymous]

Trump on his cognitive test: "It had a question like, 'pick a number, sir, any number.' Okay. 203. 'Multiple by 9. Divide by 2. Add on 1,324. Subtract 1,292. Sir, multiply it out one more time by 19. What is the answer, sir?' I got it right."


FWIW, the actual question is count backwards from 100 by 7. But I can see why it would be so perplexing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, we do need a large indoor event space on White House grounds, and have needed it for decades. Large state dinners were never comfortable and some events had to be in outside tents, at the mercy of the weather.

So I’d rather that Trump get the furious Marie-Antoinette criticism, and that future Presidents, hopefully Democrat ones, make use of the room

Win-win.

An event space is fine. An event space on the absurd scale that Trump is pursuing is idiotic. His plan is unsuitable for the site and inconsistent with the existing (historical) structures already there.

Trump himself is quite inconsistent with the historical structure of the entire US government. His ugly as fxk architecture is just a manifestation of the ugly as fxk man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump on his cognitive test: "It had a question like, 'pick a number, sir, any number.' Okay. 203. 'Multiple by 9. Divide by 2. Add on 1,324. Subtract 1,292. Sir, multiply it out one more time by 19. What is the answer, sir?' I got it right."


FWIW, the actual question is count backwards from 100 by 7. But I can see why it would be so perplexing.

It's like he thinks we can't fact check him on this very easily-checked fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, we do need a large indoor event space on White House grounds, and have needed it for decades. Large state dinners were never comfortable and some events had to be in outside tents, at the mercy of the weather.

So I’d rather that Trump get the furious Marie-Antoinette criticism, and that future Presidents, hopefully Democrat ones, make use of the room

Win-win.

An event space is fine. An event space on the absurd scale that Trump is pursuing is idiotic. His plan is unsuitable for the site and inconsistent with the existing (historical) structures already there.

Trump himself is quite inconsistent with the historical structure of the entire US government. His ugly as fxk architecture is just a manifestation of the ugly as fxk man.

Fair enough.