Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
I think it's a combination of inborn traits (both physical trains and personality) and also some aspects of her personality she cultivates and could change if she wants to. Of course she's not air kissing or ranting at people -- that would repulse people, not draw them in. Princess Di had this too -- something about her combination physical features (her height combined with her lean frame, her striking eyes) and the way she carried herself (the shy smiles, the slight stoop that led her to peer out under her bangs, but also combined with elegance and confidence too -- a strange amalgamation). I can think of others, though Di has a lot in common with TS physically/personality why so she's a good example. But like Bill Clinton was like this -- tall and imposing but also warm and disarming. Again, it's "it" factor. Some of it's just how they are, some of it is choices they make that can exploit what they have to garner the most attention and affection. I think people like this often develop a self-awareness from a young age. They notice that people respond really well to certain aspects of their appearance, or to certain behaviors, and they start cultivating those qualities. Taylor does this. There's a reason she is so photogenic, and it's not purely her appearance -- she knows her angles, how to work the expression on her face. She's probably practiced this stuff in front of a mirror a billion times. She is perfect at it. Then the makeup, hair, clothes -- all of it designed to elicit certain responses. She has this quality that is very specifically appealing to teen/tween girls, where she's sexy but in this way that is mostly alluring to women? It's hard to explain. Anyway, a lot of what she does is sort of subtle, though I think if you had someone like this in your life, you'd find it obvious. She'll arrange her face in just this perfect way for a reaction to to something. It's very self-conscious, kind of fake. But also perfect and pretty so it usually has the desired impact. But I don't mean to say it's all super conscious or intentionally manipulative either. I think people like this do these things instinctively, without forethought. It's just fundamentally in her nature to know how to do things in a way that will draw people's eyes and make them interested in her. I think it's kind of amazing and is a huge part of her success, and I also think it would be incredibly hard to live with in a romantic relationship because she's always going to be the star, of everything. At least when you're around other people. |
|
But he’s not allowed to call stupid tabloid journalists stupid.
Frankly even if he responded: oop, better go check the tabloids, he’d be in trouble |
So what. Calling someone evil because they look good in some photos is ridiculous |
My husband is on a work trip and I didn’t know where he was either. So? |
I didn't call anyone evil. Did anyone? You are arguing with yourself. If you read what I'm actually saying, I'm not even criticizing Swift. I just find her interesting. It's anthropology to me. Human beings are very interesting and I don't generally view them as villains or heroes. People are very complex. |
Plus isn't it a good thing he's focused on the super bowl and his job???? these people, they can't win. No wonder she doesn't care. She's been public, she's been quiet and I hope she is realizing like I did in my 30's, follow your own path. |
Could not agree more that it was a mistake and would have been much more successful of a launch if she'd done the timing you laid out. But I think she's like a middle school girl, and she thinks she's really sticking it to her ex when she disses him, not realizing it makes her look unhinged and still hung up on him. It's like in college when you're heartbroken over a guy, but you go to the party at his fraternity house and act over the top like you're having the time of your life, or belting out man hating songs or something in front of your ex. So I think even amid the Travis of it all, she can't resist the opportunity to stick it to Joe, and she's so tone deaf that she thinks the insane Swifties applauding this and every move she makes made it a successful launch. But what a mature woman knows is that you come off so much better if you just quietly take the high road. |
That's the thing: there’s nothing complex going on here. You (and the lame media, which needs to sell garbage to survive) want to write several paragraphs over and over about your complexity theories but it’s a silly look. |
+1 |
I don’t know about you. But I’ve never taken my emotions and thoughts into a diary much less took the time to put them into writing, themes, prose, overlay a beat & melody, do a collaboration with another article, tweak it over and over as a catchy but powerful and universal song, then record it over and over with melody, harmony, synthetics, beats, and then title it and get an album on the market. 1-3 years depending on how much quality time I had to work in it seems reasonable to put out a decent 10+ track album. Especially while on tour, working out daily, resting my voice, etc. |
I'm talking about human nature. I'm not selling anything. I'm sharing my opinion. What is silly is that you are responding even though you aren't reading any of it, just getting a general vibe that I'm not falling all over myself to say Swift's cool and everyone else drools. You are also very complex. I wonder what makes you come here to shoot down and criticize anyone who doesn't confirm your world view? Interesting. |
I disagree with the PP -- I don't think she's announcing the album now to "stick it" to Joe. I just think she wanted to announce the album at the Grammys, maybe because the 13th win is signficant for her, maybe other reasons, whatever. I do think the decision to announce it when she did was a mistake, though. The fact that it's an album she obviously put a lot of time and effort into makes that mistake kind of a bummer, actually. I think the timing of announcing it will stir up controversy instead of interest. I think Taylor genuinely wants people to hear her music and be affected by it. I think she does all this out of a strong need to be heard and understood. But I think some of her marketing choices tend to overshadow her music with peripheral concerns, and announcing at the Grammys contributes to that. I think it reflects a desperate need to hype it up as much as possible, but she's Taylor Swift, the hype follows her. She should have waited to announce until it could be the focus, instead of squeezing it into an awards show at a time when many casual fans are much more focused on her love life and what will happen when she attends the SB, than her music. |
+1 |
|
She made a bet with jack antonoff if she won she'd announce the album.
Here is the thing: Jack deliberately put the timeline of when she finished "you're losing me" out there to establish she was having issues with Joe in 2021. She was seeing Matty professionally and the personally starting about the same time. She was still officially with Joe in March 2023 when the 1975 were on SNL --- Taylor flew to NYC to see him that night, which is why he was not at the after party. This is all messier than the public knows, and I doubt the new album is all about how terrible Joe was. I think it will be about these 2 yrs of her life and how Matty came into it again. |
| And btw way, when she flew out there to see M that weekend of SNL, she was in rehearsals in another part of the country bc Eras was starting soon. |