Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Antifa is basically rebranded anarchists. This is not new. Really, everyone should be anti-fascist, though I don’t agree with the tactics used by the anarchists. The tactics, by the way, are also not new. It wasn’t the big boogeyman, until Trump instructed everyone to be terrified. So, pardon me if I’m not shaking in my boots, waiting for the big, bad antifa to come knocking on my door.

Then it's pretty odd that so many people are treating Ngo like the bogeyman simply for reporting on this nonissue.

Beat me to it. Somehow antifa/anarchists are the “boogeyman,” even though we’ve ALL seen footage of the destruction they’re responsible for. But Ngo, who takes pictures of them committing crimes, is somehow at fault. It just makes it so clear that criticisms of Ngo are merely masking the support here for antifa.

I’m critical of him because he’s an inflammatory liar. No other reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Antifa is basically rebranded anarchists. This is not new. Really, everyone should be anti-fascist, though I don’t agree with the tactics used by the anarchists. The tactics, by the way, are also not new. It wasn’t the big boogeyman, until Trump instructed everyone to be terrified. So, pardon me if I’m not shaking in my boots, waiting for the big, bad antifa to come knocking on my door.

Then it's pretty odd that so many people are treating Ngo like the bogeyman simply for reporting on this nonissue.

Beat me to it. Somehow antifa/anarchists are the “boogeyman,” even though we’ve ALL seen footage of the destruction they’re responsible for. But Ngo, who takes pictures of them committing crimes, is somehow at fault. It just makes it so clear that criticisms of Ngo are merely masking the support here for antifa.

I’m critical of him because he’s an inflammatory liar. No other reason.

Same here. Ngo is a dishonest propagandist. That is all there is to it. All of the accusations and other nonsense that Ngo's defenders have slung here are even remotely relevant and do not change any of that in the least bit.

[Anonymous]

The only accusations and nonsense being slung here are that Ngo himself is an arsonist (??) and that by covering antifa’s criminal acts, he is somehow a criminal too.

You seem to be confusing your dislike of Ngo with a desperate attempt to paint HIM as the criminal. Maybe you’d be taken more seriously if you actually admitted what thugs antifa are, and - oh, I don’t know - condemned them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only accusations and nonsense being slung here are that Ngo himself is an arsonist (??) and that by covering antifa’s criminal acts, he is somehow a criminal too.

You seem to be confusing your dislike of Ngo with a desperate attempt to paint HIM as the criminal. Maybe you’d be taken more seriously if you actually admitted what thugs antifa are, and - oh, I don’t know - condemned them.

You don't listen well. I condemn violence no matter who commits it. Stop already with your own false accusations.
As for Andy Ngo I never claimed he was an arsonist. Maybe someone else here did but I didn't, and obviously you've got every poster here muddled up in your confused brain.
But that said, while I don't know that Andy Ngo is an arsonist, he HAS consorted with violent provocateurs. Where is Andy Ngo's condemnation of Patriot Prayer? Proud Boys? Hasn't been one.

Again, I condemn ALL violence. But Andy Ngo HAS NOT. Instead, he has pushed deceptive propaganda and a completely hyperbolic, one-sided narrative. Yet here you are trying to make ME out to be the bad guy while holding Andy Ngo up to be some kind of a hero when HE has not condemned right wing extremist violence. Sorry but that does not fly and your position is completely untenable and indefensible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Antifa is basically rebranded anarchists. This is not new. Really, everyone should be anti-fascist, though I don’t agree with the tactics used by the anarchists. The tactics, by the way, are also not new. It wasn’t the big boogeyman, until Trump instructed everyone to be terrified. So, pardon me if I’m not shaking in my boots, waiting for the big, bad antifa to come knocking on my door.

Then it's pretty odd that so many people are treating Ngo like the bogeyman simply for reporting on this nonissue.

Again. He is actively creating the problem by infiltrating the groups and kicking off violence, then pretending that the problem was that bad independent of him. He is just a live-streaming arsonist and you guys are all complaining about the fires and lauding him for reporting it.

Do you understand just how ludicrous you sound? Ngo isn’t “kicking off” anything. And he’s certainly not an arsonist. Wow. He is, however, documenting *actual* arsonists and violent rioters. And somehow, his documentation is outraging you. Interesting.
DP

You summed up the entire thread succinctly. Thanks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Antifa is basically rebranded anarchists. This is not new. Really, everyone should be anti-fascist, though I don’t agree with the tactics used by the anarchists. The tactics, by the way, are also not new. It wasn’t the big boogeyman, until Trump instructed everyone to be terrified. So, pardon me if I’m not shaking in my boots, waiting for the big, bad antifa to come knocking on my door.

Then it's pretty odd that so many people are treating Ngo like the bogeyman simply for reporting on this nonissue.

Again. He is actively creating the problem by infiltrating the groups and kicking off violence, then pretending that the problem was that bad independent of him. He is just a live-streaming arsonist and you guys are all complaining about the fires and lauding him for reporting it.

Do you understand just how ludicrous you sound? Ngo isn’t “kicking off” anything. And he’s certainly not an arsonist. Wow. He is, however, documenting *actual* arsonists and violent rioters. And somehow, his documentation is outraging you. Interesting.
DP

You summed up the entire thread succinctly. Thanks!

Wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only accusations and nonsense being slung here are that Ngo himself is an arsonist (??) and that by covering antifa’s criminal acts, he is somehow a criminal too.

You seem to be confusing your dislike of Ngo with a desperate attempt to paint HIM as the criminal. Maybe you’d be taken more seriously if you actually admitted what thugs antifa are, and - oh, I don’t know - condemned them.

You don't listen well. I condemn violence no matter who commits it. Stop already with your own false accusations.
As for Andy Ngo I never claimed he was an arsonist. Maybe someone else here did but I didn't, and obviously you've got every poster here muddled up in your confused brain.
But that said, while I don't know that Andy Ngo is an arsonist, he HAS consorted with violent provocateurs. Where is Andy Ngo's condemnation of Patriot Prayer? Proud Boys? Hasn't been one.

Again, I condemn ALL violence. But Andy Ngo HAS NOT. Instead, he has pushed deceptive propaganda and a completely hyperbolic, one-sided narrative. Yet here you are trying to make ME out to be the bad guy while holding Andy Ngo up to be some kind of a hero when HE has not condemned right wing extremist violence. Sorry but that does not fly and your position is completely untenable and indefensible.

You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only accusations and nonsense being slung here are that Ngo himself is an arsonist (??) and that by covering antifa’s criminal acts, he is somehow a criminal too.

You seem to be confusing your dislike of Ngo with a desperate attempt to paint HIM as the criminal. Maybe you’d be taken more seriously if you actually admitted what thugs antifa are, and - oh, I don’t know - condemned them.

You don't listen well. I condemn violence no matter who commits it. Stop already with your own false accusations.
As for Andy Ngo I never claimed he was an arsonist. Maybe someone else here did but I didn't, and obviously you've got every poster here muddled up in your confused brain.
But that said, while I don't know that Andy Ngo is an arsonist, he HAS consorted with violent provocateurs. Where is Andy Ngo's condemnation of Patriot Prayer? Proud Boys? Hasn't been one.

Again, I condemn ALL violence. But Andy Ngo HAS NOT. Instead, he has pushed deceptive propaganda and a completely hyperbolic, one-sided narrative. Yet here you are trying to make ME out to be the bad guy while holding Andy Ngo up to be some kind of a hero when HE has not condemned right wing extremist violence. Sorry but that does not fly and your position is completely untenable and indefensible.

You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

We called them “mostly peaceful” protests because 93% of the summer protests were completely peaceful. I am so tired of people pulling out that same, tired line, while ignoring what my actually means.

Ngo claims antifa is trying to take over the country. They are not. They’re just the same anarchists that we’ve always had.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only accusations and nonsense being slung here are that Ngo himself is an arsonist (??) and that by covering antifa’s criminal acts, he is somehow a criminal too.

You seem to be confusing your dislike of Ngo with a desperate attempt to paint HIM as the criminal. Maybe you’d be taken more seriously if you actually admitted what thugs antifa are, and - oh, I don’t know - condemned them.

You don't listen well. I condemn violence no matter who commits it. Stop already with your own false accusations.
As for Andy Ngo I never claimed he was an arsonist. Maybe someone else here did but I didn't, and obviously you've got every poster here muddled up in your confused brain.
But that said, while I don't know that Andy Ngo is an arsonist, he HAS consorted with violent provocateurs. Where is Andy Ngo's condemnation of Patriot Prayer? Proud Boys? Hasn't been one.

Again, I condemn ALL violence. But Andy Ngo HAS NOT. Instead, he has pushed deceptive propaganda and a completely hyperbolic, one-sided narrative. Yet here you are trying to make ME out to be the bad guy while holding Andy Ngo up to be some kind of a hero when HE has not condemned right wing extremist violence. Sorry but that does not fly and your position is completely untenable and indefensible.

You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

We called them “mostly peaceful” protests because 93% of the summer protests were completely peaceful. I am so tired of people pulling out that same, tired line, while ignoring what my actually means.

Ngo claims antifa is trying to take over the country. They are not. They’re just the same anarchists that we’ve always had.

Yeah, and 99% of people survive COVID. Oh wait.

People don't get your meaning? Good. Now you know what it feels like.

-Speaking for the 7%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only accusations and nonsense being slung here are that Ngo himself is an arsonist (??) and that by covering antifa’s criminal acts, he is somehow a criminal too.

You seem to be confusing your dislike of Ngo with a desperate attempt to paint HIM as the criminal. Maybe you’d be taken more seriously if you actually admitted what thugs antifa are, and - oh, I don’t know - condemned them.

You don't listen well. I condemn violence no matter who commits it. Stop already with your own false accusations.
As for Andy Ngo I never claimed he was an arsonist. Maybe someone else here did but I didn't, and obviously you've got every poster here muddled up in your confused brain.
But that said, while I don't know that Andy Ngo is an arsonist, he HAS consorted with violent provocateurs. Where is Andy Ngo's condemnation of Patriot Prayer? Proud Boys? Hasn't been one.

Again, I condemn ALL violence. But Andy Ngo HAS NOT. Instead, he has pushed deceptive propaganda and a completely hyperbolic, one-sided narrative. Yet here you are trying to make ME out to be the bad guy while holding Andy Ngo up to be some kind of a hero when HE has not condemned right wing extremist violence. Sorry but that does not fly and your position is completely untenable and indefensible.

You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

We called them “mostly peaceful” protests because 93% of the summer protests were completely peaceful. I am so tired of people pulling out that same, tired line, while ignoring what my actually means.

Ngo claims antifa is trying to take over the country. They are not. They’re just the same anarchists that we’ve always had.

Yeah, and 99% of people survive COVID. Oh wait.

People don't get your meaning? Good. Now you know what it feels like.

-Speaking for the 7%

And then we found out that a lot of the violence at the otherwise peaceful protests was outside agitator groups like Boogaloo Bois.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only accusations and nonsense being slung here are that Ngo himself is an arsonist (??) and that by covering antifa’s criminal acts, he is somehow a criminal too.

You seem to be confusing your dislike of Ngo with a desperate attempt to paint HIM as the criminal. Maybe you’d be taken more seriously if you actually admitted what thugs antifa are, and - oh, I don’t know - condemned them.

You don't listen well. I condemn violence no matter who commits it. Stop already with your own false accusations.
As for Andy Ngo I never claimed he was an arsonist. Maybe someone else here did but I didn't, and obviously you've got every poster here muddled up in your confused brain.
But that said, while I don't know that Andy Ngo is an arsonist, he HAS consorted with violent provocateurs. Where is Andy Ngo's condemnation of Patriot Prayer? Proud Boys? Hasn't been one.

Again, I condemn ALL violence. But Andy Ngo HAS NOT. Instead, he has pushed deceptive propaganda and a completely hyperbolic, one-sided narrative. Yet here you are trying to make ME out to be the bad guy while holding Andy Ngo up to be some kind of a hero when HE has not condemned right wing extremist violence. Sorry but that does not fly and your position is completely untenable and indefensible.

You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

We called them “mostly peaceful” protests because 93% of the summer protests were completely peaceful. I am so tired of people pulling out that same, tired line, while ignoring what my actually means.

Ngo claims antifa is trying to take over the country. They are not. They’re just the same anarchists that we’ve always had.

Yep, some of us are old enough to remember the same anarchists protesting WTO back in the 1990s. Right wing didn't have a problem with them back then because they didn't like WTO either.

[Anonymous]

^ right wing outrage only happens when it suits them.

They are such complete phonies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only accusations and nonsense being slung here are that Ngo himself is an arsonist (??) and that by covering antifa’s criminal acts, he is somehow a criminal too.

You seem to be confusing your dislike of Ngo with a desperate attempt to paint HIM as the criminal. Maybe you’d be taken more seriously if you actually admitted what thugs antifa are, and - oh, I don’t know - condemned them.

You don't listen well. I condemn violence no matter who commits it. Stop already with your own false accusations.
As for Andy Ngo I never claimed he was an arsonist. Maybe someone else here did but I didn't, and obviously you've got every poster here muddled up in your confused brain.
But that said, while I don't know that Andy Ngo is an arsonist, he HAS consorted with violent provocateurs. Where is Andy Ngo's condemnation of Patriot Prayer? Proud Boys? Hasn't been one.

Again, I condemn ALL violence. But Andy Ngo HAS NOT. Instead, he has pushed deceptive propaganda and a completely hyperbolic, one-sided narrative. Yet here you are trying to make ME out to be the bad guy while holding Andy Ngo up to be some kind of a hero when HE has not condemned right wing extremist violence. Sorry but that does not fly and your position is completely untenable and indefensible.

You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

We called them “mostly peaceful” protests because 93% of the summer protests were completely peaceful. I am so tired of people pulling out that same, tired line, while ignoring what my actually means.

Ngo claims antifa is trying to take over the country. They are not. They’re just the same anarchists that we’ve always had.

Yeah, and 99% of people survive COVID. Oh wait.

People don't get your meaning? Good. Now you know what it feels like.

-Speaking for the 7%

Very few countries had a covid death rate lower than 1%. Just FYI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a right wing provocatuer, full stop.

In the opinion of a typical ignorant leftist. Full stop.

This. It's amazing how much they hate him. He's nothing like Project Veritas. He posts unedited clips of people rioting in public places. That's it. That's his big crime.

He always just happens to be in whatever city there is some protest that he is capturing. It's all coincidence.




https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2021-02-08/andy-ngo-new-book-still-pretends-antifa-real-enemy

He never claimed to show up at a protest by coincidence.

Reminds me of the story of a bunch of fires in a small town and one man always being found in the crowd when it happened. Turns out the little fire watcher was actually the arsonist.

+1
He’s a useless little sht provocateur. He has definitely edited some of little videos and misrepresented others. Slimy republicans think he’s a good person, but they have lost their ability to perceive who is a good person.

He is... and no matter who's involved, he always claims they are "Antifa" even if the protest has absolutely nothing to do with Antifa. He isn't reporting, he's peddling a narrative to fearmonger and stir conservatives up. If someone in rural America were to listen to nobody but Andy Ngo they'd think half of American cities had been burned to the ground, that police are doing nothing and that the country is on the brink of being taken over when that's not even remotely the case. Most of the Portland protests have been confined to like a 2 block area, most of Portland is doing just fine. Andy will show 15 different angles of a piece of the same building that was vandalized or burned and make you think it is 15 different buildings and multiple events spanning a single date when it was just one incident. He'll show a piece of burning cardboard that was put out within minutes but try to make it sound like an entire neighborhood got burned down. It's all spin and narrative.

This exactly.

A guy I know likes to think he listens to “both sides” of real journalism and experts and uses him, Turley, and Greenwood to support his arguments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

Your post is just really, really sad. There’s nothing funny about the fact that the Proud Boys and Boogaloo Bois were the ones to commit the violence during all the protests last summer. That’s the whole point of why Ngo is pointless and not a journalist. He is a provocateur. He is part of the criminal class; it serves his purpose and that of all the far right wing lunatics for peaceful protests to turn violent and so they turn them violent. People have posted links upthread with proof.

Get it through your head: Ngo is the problem.