What is the wildest conspiracy theory you actually believe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:COVID-19 was a natural bat virus being studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and crappy safety protocols let it out. The Chinese knew about it for the whole fall of 2019 and covered it up.

They are now seeing evidence of COVID in blood that was donated in the fall of 2019 in the US.

My BIL is a microbiologist. This is true. They tested the blood supply from 2016-2019. 50% tested positive

Who is "they", how far back are such positivity rates, what do you mean by "the blood supply"?--Donated blood according to the Red Cross, is good for 42 days. Plasma can be stored for a year.

See, these are the questions you ask.

If I believed something, I wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.

It is true they’ve found covid in blood samples in the US from mid-December 2019 (not really surprising given COVID was first identified in mid-November). Earlier than that = conspiracy theory.

https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/press-release/2020/study-suggests-possible-new-covid-19-timeline-in-the-us.html

I think it was here before then. There were entirely too many people who were sick who did not have strep, pneumonia or flu. The study only tested samples from mid-December to mid-Jan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:COVID-19 was a natural bat virus being studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and crappy safety protocols let it out. The Chinese knew about it for the whole fall of 2019 and covered it up.

They are now seeing evidence of COVID in blood that was donated in the fall of 2019 in the US.

My BIL is a microbiologist. This is true. They tested the blood supply from 2016-2019. 50% tested positive

Who is "they", how far back are such positivity rates, what do you mean by "the blood supply"?--Donated blood according to the Red Cross, is good for 42 days. Plasma can be stored for a year.

See, these are the questions you ask.

If I believed something, I wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.

It is true they’ve found covid in blood samples in the US from mid-December 2019 (not really surprising given COVID was first identified in mid-November). Earlier than that = conspiracy theory.

https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/press-release/2020/study-suggests-possible-new-covid-19-timeline-in-the-us.html

I think it was here before then. There were entirely too many people who were sick who did not have strep, pneumonia or flu. The study only tested samples from mid-December to mid-Jan.

Isn't there a reliable way to find out, that someone in a position of importance should be exploring? Even if the Red Cross might not store older blood, there are plenty of blood samples and other biospecimens routinely stored for future research that could be tested. Also, what about testing earlier sewage samples? It seems to me like the Trump administration and the Dems all have an interest in not bringing such information to light (although I'm not sure why this would be the case, insert your favorite wild theory here). I'm very puzzled by this lack of official inquiry.

I'm not considering CDC or state public health agencies, because I assume that they all are adhering to the the party line with respect to when covid-18 was first in the US. After all of the manipulation and interference with CDC during this pandemic, I hate to be so jaded but so much political influence has been wielded within HHS and other agencies during this administration that so many Federal offices are just not reliable sources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stevie Wonder can see.

He may get a peek (as Chris Rock said) after all:

https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/article/3112846/blind-could-see-again-if-brain-implants-monkeys-use

🐒🙈🙉🙊

[Anonymous]

That the government not only has UFOs but has reversed engineered the technology and parses it out every so often. I don’t even know if this qualifies as a conspiracy anymore.

Military technology is actually many years ahead of what we think.

The Vatican has vast stores of ancient and secret knowledge hoarded that it will never share.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The royal family killed Diana because she was pregnant with Dodi Fayed's child.

I believe they would kill to protect themselves, and have always wondered if they killed her.

Why would they kill her because Fayed's child???? Forgive my ignorance as I'm not into the royal family.

Because he's Muslim. The BRF wouldn't do with their princes having a half brother who's Muslim.

I think they were planning to have her killed and then there was the accident. Unless the guy on the motorcycle chasing them shot them in the head, there was no guarantee that she would die in the crash. It was dumb luck for them that she died that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diana’s death was no accident.

She literally predicted her own murder. She’s been “erased” by the Royals. She couldn’t even survive one year, I think Charles just couldn’t have Diana out in the world happy and drawing attention to her causes, causing endless comparisons to his “precious” (Camilla) not to mention moving on with her life.

Diana may have been a lovely person, and she had the potential to grow into a mature and accomplished woman, but she was also a hot mess express. Besides, she'd been separated and dating for five years before her death, including dating a Muslim man for several years.

Sometimes bad things happen, particularly when there's speed and drunk driving involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The royal family killed Diana because she was pregnant with Dodi Fayed's child.

I also believe they had her killed.

How?
They didn't know her driver would be drunk. How did it happen?

Maybe they gave the driver something.
How do you know he was drunk? Because a news source you read somewhere says he was. How do you know the report can be believed? The autopsy? Short of witnessing it with your own eyes, how can you really KNOW?

I love English history and I know two things" 1) women who marry Kings are rarely happy and 2) you don't cross the monarch or you will likely end up dead.

I distinctly recall the driver's friends and family stating that he was not a drinker. He was a committed teetotaler. Family and friends were outraged at the insinuation that he was drunk. I know Diana's death was really a murder for this reason. Go back to early days after the accident and read the news accounts about the driver. He was framed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The Plan"

"The Plan" is absolutely real--this city is unrecognizable to this 60 year old native.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:COVID-19 was a natural bat virus being studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and crappy safety protocols let it out. The Chinese knew about it for the whole fall of 2019 and covered it up.

They are now seeing evidence of COVID in blood that was donated in the fall of 2019 in the US.

My BIL is a microbiologist. This is true. They tested the blood supply from 2016-2019. 50% tested positive

Who is "they", how far back are such positivity rates, what do you mean by "the blood supply"?--Donated blood according to the Red Cross, is good for 42 days. Plasma can be stored for a year.

See, these are the questions you ask.

If I believed something, I wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.

It is true they’ve found covid in blood samples in the US from mid-December 2019 (not really surprising given COVID was first identified in mid-November). Earlier than that = conspiracy theory.

https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/press-release/2020/study-suggests-possible-new-covid-19-timeline-in-the-us.html

I think it was here before then. There were entirely too many people who were sick who did not have strep, pneumonia or flu. The study only tested samples from mid-December to mid-Jan.

I am not a conspiracy nut in any way but I was violently sick dec 11-13 on a business trip. Missed everything I was in town for. Flew home. Hospitalized 3 days later w 104 fever and all the other crap. Tested negative for fly and strep

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The Plan"

"The Plan" is absolutely real--this city is unrecognizable to this 60 year old native.

The what??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That the government not only has UFOs but has reversed engineered the technology and parses it out every so often. I don’t even know if this qualifies as a conspiracy anymore.

Military technology is actually many years ahead of what we think.

The Vatican has vast stores of ancient and secret knowledge hoarded that it will never share.

I could see this as a very real possibility. It is brimming with beauty and it’s own sovereignty.

[Anonymous]

River Phoenix was murdered

[Anonymous]

Conspiracy theories are put out there/encouraged to distract us from the many (blatant) ways we are screwed over by the government and rich powerful people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The Plan"

"The Plan" is absolutely real--this city is unrecognizable to this 60 year old native.

The what??

"The Plan" is/was a codeword in many wards of DC about how yuppie whites would come in and push out long-time residents and take over the city. Basically gentrification and political usurping of the local DC political establishment.

[Anonymous]

The Diana worship is odd. The men she "dated" were genuine scumbag druggy trash. She was obviously not the person you think she was.