Reply to What is the wildest conspiracy theory you actually believe?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "What is the wildest conspiracy theory you actually believe?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]COVID-19 was a natural bat virus being studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and crappy safety protocols let it out. The Chinese knew about it for the whole fall of 2019 and covered it up.[/quote]

They are now seeing evidence of COVID in blood that was donated in the fall of 2019 in the US. [/quote]

My BIL is a microbiologist. This is true. They tested the blood supply from 2016-2019. 50% tested positive[/quote]

Who is "they", how far back are such positivity rates, what do you mean by "the blood supply"?--Donated blood according to the Red Cross, is good for 42 days. Plasma can be stored for a year.

See, these are the questions you ask.

If I believed something, I wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory. [/quote]

It is true they’ve found covid in blood samples in the US from mid-December 2019 (not really surprising given COVID was first identified in mid-November). Earlier than that = conspiracy theory.

https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/press-release/2020/study-suggests-possible-new-covid-19-timeline-in-the-us.html
[/quote]

I think it was here before then. There were entirely too many people who were sick who did not have strep, pneumonia or flu. The study only tested samples from mid-December to mid-Jan.[/quote]

Isn't there a reliable way to find out, that someone in a position of importance should be exploring? Even if the Red Cross might not store older blood, there are plenty of blood samples and other biospecimens routinely stored for future research that could be tested.  Also, what about testing earlier sewage samples?  It seems to me like the Trump administration and the Dems all have an interest in not bringing such information to light (although I'm not sure why this would be the case, insert your favorite wild theory here).  I'm very puzzled by this lack of official inquiry.

I'm not considering CDC or state public health agencies, because I assume that they all are adhering to the the party line with respect to when covid-18 was first in the US.  After all of the manipulation and interference with CDC during this pandemic, I hate to be so jaded but so much political influence has been wielded within HHS and other agencies during this administration that so many Federal offices are just not reliable sources.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics