24 year old wins Republican primary in NC-11 house seat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now he's implicated for insider trading? I think the GOP is not strenulously quashing news reports. How to explain all the truth nuggets coming out about this deeply flawed traitor.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/madison-cawthorn-implicated-in-potential-insider-trading-scheme-experts-say

Insider trading is legal in Congress.

Read the article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now he's implicated for insider trading? I think the GOP is not strenulously quashing news reports. How to explain all the truth nuggets coming out about this deeply flawed traitor.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/madison-cawthorn-implicated-in-potential-insider-trading-scheme-experts-say

May have. Potential.

The leftist ‘hits’ are glaringly obvious.

Yeah, like the Washington Examiner is picking up leftist hits.

+1
To the genius bar pp, this isn’t a leftist hit, this the GOP trying to get rid of a liability. A sacrificial lamb, if you will. He’s just a little too volatile, and not in the ways that the GOP likes.

I guess I'm so far in my own bubble I don't really get this - what makes him different from the others of his ilk? Is there something really bad that's about to come out - that's worse than what we already know about him? What's the actual reason that even the Trumpy GOP wants to axe him?

I’m not a republican, but I would guess that it’s that he’s just too volatile. He’s got sexual assault charges plus the love for Adolph Hitler (who says it’s a life goal to get to the Eagle’s Nest? That’s a weird thing). He apparently likes to wear ladies’ bras and appears to have allowed photographs to be taken. He has been caught driving on a revoked license not once but twice. He tried twice to board a plane with a gun. He enthusiastically supported the coup. And then he appears to have blown the whistle on the kind of fun Republicans get up to in DC.

The GOP is clearly criminal, but they generally don’t brag about their criminality. If he’s starting to brag about it, what else will he tell? Trump has terribly loose lips, but he gets a pass. Madison might alert the media to something that the GOP really wants to stay hidden.

Again, this might just be me in a bubble - but those things don't seem so categorically different from a lot of other Republicans? The Jan 6 thing especially - but none of it really. (And the lingerie pics seemed like a big nothingburger to me - seemed more like a bro frat thing than evidence of being sexually interesting in any way. That's how it looked to me anyway.)

I guess he seems off on a weird frolic - but how is he different from Gaetz, say? Or is Gaetz one gun on a plane away from being disavowed, too?

No, none of those are really different than plenty of other republicans, such as Gaetz, MJT, Gosar, Boehbert, Goehmert, etc. But none of them have crossed the line into implicating their fellow republicans in their nutty theories and allegations. Cawthorn crossed that line and the party-controlled media is now turning on him.

So it really is the orgies comment driving this? Wow - that's wild!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now he's implicated for insider trading? I think the GOP is not strenulously quashing news reports. How to explain all the truth nuggets coming out about this deeply flawed traitor.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/madison-cawthorn-implicated-in-potential-insider-trading-scheme-experts-say

Insider trading is legal in Congress.

Read the article.

I did. It makes no mention of the fact that members of Congress to this day continue to legally engage in insider trading.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now he's implicated for insider trading? I think the GOP is not strenulously quashing news reports. How to explain all the truth nuggets coming out about this deeply flawed traitor.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/madison-cawthorn-implicated-in-potential-insider-trading-scheme-experts-say

May have. Potential.

The leftist ‘hits’ are glaringly obvious.

Oh yes that hit from the “leftist” <checks notes> Washington Examiner.

The party pics also came from the republicans. There is no reason for the democrats to go after him. Having a crazy dude like him on the republican side is great for democrats, and they can't win that district anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now he's implicated for insider trading? I think the GOP is not strenulously quashing news reports. How to explain all the truth nuggets coming out about this deeply flawed traitor.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/madison-cawthorn-implicated-in-potential-insider-trading-scheme-experts-say

Insider trading is legal in Congress.

Read the article.

I did. It makes no mention of the fact that members of Congress to this day continue to legally engage in insider trading.

This case has nothing to do with any information Cawthorn may have learned in his capacity as a member of Congress. It’s because of his status as an insider. Stop trying to whatabout and ask Chris Collins if you can’t be prosecuted and convicted for insider trading as a sitting member of Congress.

[Anonymous]

1. Has anyone ever been convicted of insider trading of cryptocurrency?

2. How much money did Cawthorne make trading cryptocurrency if any?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now he's implicated for insider trading? I think the GOP is not strenulously quashing news reports. How to explain all the truth nuggets coming out about this deeply flawed traitor.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/madison-cawthorn-implicated-in-potential-insider-trading-scheme-experts-say

Insider trading is legal in Congress.

Read the article.

I did. It makes no mention of the fact that members of Congress to this day continue to legally engage in insider trading.

This case has nothing to do with any information Cawthorn may have learned in his capacity as a member of Congress. It’s because of his status as an insider. Stop trying to whatabout and ask Chris Collins if you can’t be prosecuted and convicted for insider trading as a sitting member of Congress.

So he should have participated in the orgies and taken advantage of the info he may have learned as a member of Congress? OK Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now he's implicated for insider trading? I think the GOP is not strenulously quashing news reports. How to explain all the truth nuggets coming out about this deeply flawed traitor.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/madison-cawthorn-implicated-in-potential-insider-trading-scheme-experts-say

Insider trading is legal in Congress.

Read the article.

I did. It makes no mention of the fact that members of Congress to this day continue to legally engage in insider trading.

This case has nothing to do with any information Cawthorn may have learned in his capacity as a member of Congress. It’s because of his status as an insider. Stop trying to whatabout and ask Chris Collins if you can’t be prosecuted and convicted for insider trading as a sitting member of Congress.

So he should have participated in the orgies and taken advantage of the info he may have learned as a member of Congress? OK Got it.

Dont talk about the orgies and only make unfair profits because you are a member of Congress. Did he miss orientation or something?

[Anonymous]

Was there bipartisan participation in these orgies? Or were they only mingling with other members from the same side of the aisle?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was there bipartisan participation in these orgies? Or were they only mingling with other members from the same side of the aisle?

I’m pretty sure bipartisanship is dead, and that includes the orgies, but I would bet Manchin and Sinema are welcome regulars at the GOP orgies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was there bipartisan participation in these orgies? Or were they only mingling with other members from the same side of the aisle?

Cawthorn’s original orgy interview only talked about Republicans (not by name though.)

[Anonymous]

What about Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1. Has anyone ever been convicted of insider trading of cryptocurrency?

2. How much money did Cawthorne make trading cryptocurrency if any?

1. None, but this is a civil lawsuit, not a criminal investigation.
2. Unclear until the discovery process requested by the lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Can someone refresh me on how this dipsh*t won a seat in the first place? I vaguely recall or maybe I'm just assuming the GOP apparatus funded him to try and create a young right wing answer to AOC? He clearly is not and never was ready for primetime. He's a flat-out moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone refresh me on how this dipsh*t won a seat in the first place? I vaguely recall or maybe I'm just assuming the GOP apparatus funded him to try and create a young right wing answer to AOC? He clearly is not and never was ready for primetime. He's a flat-out moron.

PP who mentioned Mark Meadows was right. Meadows supported this clown to run in the district he vacated to become chief of staff. Trump actually supported a more normal Republican in the GOP primary, some woman real estate agent. It’s all at the beginning of this thread.