apparently something big is about to drop about mark robinson...

[Anonymous]

So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

Did they read the really dirty stuff tho

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

Did they read the really dirty stuff tho

Why would they?
They won’t hear about it from wherever they get their news and the pulpit will tell them the Christian thing to do, is own the libs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

Did they read the really dirty stuff tho

Why would they?
They won’t hear about it from wherever they get their news and the pulpit will tell them the Christian thing to do, is own the libs.

For once CNN eliminating something bad from their reporting on a Republican was understandable. I’m really sorry I read that stuff about what he was doing with his wife’s sister.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

Why wouldn’t they? So many people want to believe the fiction that there are very fine people on both sides, but it’s okay to understand that people who are so racist that they want to bring back slavery and so everything else gross that they support Project 2025. Some people are bad people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh this’ll work. Great hire. Top notch.

I think some Republicans really wonder why they’re not given respect and why people don’t seem to think they’re very bright.

Burkman is such a scumbag. I can never forgive him for what he did to Seth Rich's family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

Now that the Trump campaign has disavowed its support of Robinson, I imagine JD is allowed to have an opinion!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

He is a scared, weak little b

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh this’ll work. Great hire. Top notch.

I think some Republicans really wonder why they’re not given respect and why people don’t seem to think they’re very bright.

Is Jack Burkman another one of Donald Trump's aliases?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

Guilty of what crime?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

Guilty of what crime?

You know that PP meant guilty of actually being the person who posted all of that rancid stuff, which is not a crime. However, if he actually was peeping at naked girls in the showers at NCA&T, that is certainly a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

Now that the Trump campaign has disavowed its support of Robinson, I imagine JD is allowed to have an opinion!

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dear Mark, this is what discovery will look like if you sue CNN. Please proceed, Lieutenant Governor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

Now that the Trump campaign has disavowed its support of Robinson, I imagine JD is allowed to have an opinion!

Link?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-withdraws-support-gop-pulls-funding-from-black-nazi-mark-robinson

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This. They don't care who is elected as long as their agenda is advanced.

What agenda? To own the libs?

No. To own state governments so they can gerrymander congressional districts, create permanent minority rule, stack courts with favorable judges, deligitimize opposition and end democracy as we have known it.

You know...what they've been doing successfully for 45 years.

THIS. How easily Dem supporters are distracted by meme politics.