Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
They aren't being shortchanged. They get money that MCPS receives based on the number of low income children. They are stealing from poor kids. |
This information is publicly available, and it shows that the biggest gap is between self-contained programs and everyone else. There are schools spending $70K - $105K per pupil. Once you get beyond those six or so schools, the difference between per pupil spending at the neediest vs. least needy schools is a much narrower gap. Would you make the case that typically developing kids are being "short changed" by the kids in those programs? I wouldn't, because I'm not a monster. You shouldn't, either. |
Of course they're being short-changed, if not by MCPS then by the state and federal government. But it sounds like they're being robbed by by all 3. |
It's called a representative democracy. The people chose their leaders who decided how much to tax and what to spend tax dollars on. Go live on an island with no government if you don't like it. |
How is that "short-changing the W schools" if high poverty schools have greater needs? |
I'd heard the PTA at many of these schools raise a small fortune to supplement their school budget further. |
Correct. I am absolutely fine with the highest needs schools getting more money to meet the exceptional needs of their students. They need those resources to meet even the basic level needs of kids who are living in poverty, have experienced trauma, or who need support to access the curriculum. It costs less money to educate kids who are arriving at school well rested, well fed, and highly supported. If those parents want to use their private funds to build a planetarium at the school or whatever, good for them, but I'm fine with the highest need schools getting more taxpayer money. It's good for society if we educate all children. |
OK, so you agree that kids in W schools are being short-changed. I'm glad we can start from a place of truthfulness. Many progressives are out hawking the lie that schools in poor neighborhoods don't get as much money as W schools. Now we can discuss the degree to which W schools should or shouldn't get short-changed. Do you want to start or shall I? |
Because it's taking so much money from W schools that some of them don't have basic necessities while schools in poor neighborhoods receive millions of dollars more per year. That's simply ridiculous. |
Which schools are not having their basic necessities met? Please be specific. |
Unfortunately progressives passed policies that prevent PTAs from funding anything that would have a meaningful positive impact on learning. This shows exactly what equity is....keep a lid on the top schools. |
Are you referring to the fact that PTAs cannot fund teacher positions? Because that's been Maryland state law forever. |
MCPS should educate all children equally. Spending millions more in schools in poor neighborhoods is simply throwing good money after bad. Some of these schools have truancy rates that are through the roof. Imagine what kids at Whitman or Churchill could do if their schools received an equal amount of money. And then imagine what it would be like if those schools received money commensurate with the amount paid by the families in those neighborhoods. |
Not just teachers. Any staff. PTAs also cannot fund anything structural. And there are numerous other prohibitions I cannot recall right now. But yes, progressives did make this change a while ago. |
Many W schools like Poolesville and Wootton are crumbling. And all W school have a much higher student to teacher ratio, so they are being short-changed that way every day. There are many instances of classes being combined because W schools aren't allotted enough teachers. Meanwhile schools in poorer neighborhoods are overflowing with staff and teachers. They can afford this with the millions of dollars more they receive every year. It's simply unfair. |