What are your honest opinions of Camilla Parker Bowles today in 2022 ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.

Or maybe she would have married Hasnat Khan, had a few more kids, and reached the point where she no longer feared that she might be killed if the future king of England had non-white, possibly Muslim, siblings.

Khan dropped her and Diana embarrassed herself by throwing herself at him. In fact he returned to Pakistan so that he would not be involved in the drama after Diana’s death. He also said he would not marry her because of cultural differences. He respected her charitable work snd probably thought it was fun to boff her, but she would never be his wife. You have little understanding of the Middle Eastern male mind if you think most Muslim men would want to procreate with Diana. She had her virgin moment with Charles and was not recreating it for a Muslim man.

Don't be silly. Thousands of Middle Eastern men have married and procreated with Western women.

Commoners, of course. But not someone of Diana’s standing and certainly not Khan who married and divorced one young woman and is now married to another young woman. At 36, Diana was over her sale by date for Khan.

You ought to make up your mind whether she was too blue-blood OR too old for him OR it was cultural differences.

And Dodi would have married her in a hot minute if she was willing. Dodi, whose billionaire father married a Finnish woman and had four kids with her.

All three as stated. The conversation is about Hasnat Khan, not Dodi Fayed. You do know the difference between Egyptians and Pakistanis, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Time to move on, she deserves her place. She works hard, doesn’t complain and it’s down to earth ( as much as possible in her position ).

I do enjoy Tracey Ullman's version of Camilla. If I had got to have a G&T with a royal family member, Camilla would be high up on the list.

+1 - the tales that dame could tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Time to move on, she deserves her place. She works hard, doesn’t complain and it’s down to earth ( as much as possible in her position ).

I do enjoy Tracey Ullman's version of Camilla. If I had got to have a G&T with a royal family member, Camilla would be high up on the list.

+1 - the tales that dame could tell.

She isn't going to tell you anything. Kanga was pushed out a window and Diana murdered in a tunnel because they couldn't keep their moves shut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My answer is shaped by the fact that years of my tax money went to maintaining this family of grifters. I think the monarchy has to go. These people are parasites, Camilla included. Her only accomplishment is her relationship with Charles, and she doesn’t deserve to be maintained for that.

If she weren’t a grifter living off the public purse, I would view her merely as a physically unattractive, not very bright woman married to an ugly, unintelligent man who selfishly put his own needs over those of his small children.

LOL Now that you are living in the States you can watch your tax money support a military that defends most of Europe including the country where you paid taxes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My answer is shaped by the fact that years of my tax money went to maintaining this family of grifters. I think the monarchy has to go. These people are parasites, Camilla included. Her only accomplishment is her relationship with Charles, and she doesn’t deserve to be maintained for that.

If she weren’t a grifter living off the public purse, I would view her merely as a physically unattractive, not very bright woman married to an ugly, unintelligent man who selfishly put his own needs over those of his small children.

Honest question here - none of the consorts have done anything consequential in the UK. So what were you expecting?

DP: Would you view the Duke of Edinburg Award as something significant? (I genuinely don’t know the extent of its impact.)
Many members of the family are very involved in charitable endeavors, raising money and calling attention to specific causes. Do the benefits— tangible and intangible— seem to at least balance out the costs?

I always find it interesting when someone leave their country and then denigrates it. Something like Charles marrying Diana and then cheating with Camilla. Maybe it's a British thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Camilla = Patron Saint of Side Pieces. I am sure that she inspires hope for so many.

Diana = Patron Saint of communications majors who marry older, wealthy men so that they don't have to do anything with their lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My answer is shaped by the fact that years of my tax money went to maintaining this family of grifters. I think the monarchy has to go. These people are parasites, Camilla included. Her only accomplishment is her relationship with Charles, and she doesn’t deserve to be maintained for that.

If she weren’t a grifter living off the public purse, I would view her merely as a physically unattractive, not very bright woman married to an ugly, unintelligent man who selfishly put his own needs over those of his small children.

Honest question here - none of the consorts have done anything consequential in the UK. So what were you expecting?

DP: Would you view the Duke of Edinburg Award as something significant? (I genuinely don’t know the extent of its impact.)
Many members of the family are very involved in charitable endeavors, raising money and calling attention to specific causes. Do the benefits— tangible and intangible— seem to at least balance out the costs?

Sure but I don’t see anything tangible from the female consorts at all. Phillip was an exception - not only a man but a Navy Commander who went on tours for half a year away at a time on his own. He wanted to establish his independence. I don’t see anything similar from Elizabeth’s mother, grandmother or her daughter-in-law.

I’ve been told that the Queen Mother was instrumental in helping people keep their spirits up during WWII. I realize that’s probably both arguable and intangible, but I can see a huge value in that. I’m imagining, for example, what these past two years might have been like with a small number of familiar, reassuring, and even trusted voices, united in providing guidance and support and perhaps a shared identity as we’ve stumbled through COVID.

As for the other consorts, if you value what the monarchs themselves do, I guess it’s not a huge step to value the small number of people who support them in ways that allow them to do their jobs more effectively. I’m not arguing either way though.

The Queen Mother managed to get her sickly husband to donate enough sperm so that she could be artificially inseminated and add vigor to the weak German line. She died at 101 and her husband died at 57.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My answer is shaped by the fact that years of my tax money went to maintaining this family of grifters. I think the monarchy has to go. These people are parasites, Camilla included. Her only accomplishment is her relationship with Charles, and she doesn’t deserve to be maintained for that.

If she weren’t a grifter living off the public purse, I would view her merely as a physically unattractive, not very bright woman married to an ugly, unintelligent man who selfishly put his own needs over those of his small children.

Honest question here - none of the consorts have done anything consequential in the UK. So what were you expecting?

DP: Would you view the Duke of Edinburg Award as something significant? (I genuinely don’t know the extent of its impact.)
Many members of the family are very involved in charitable endeavors, raising money and calling attention to specific causes. Do the benefits— tangible and intangible— seem to at least balance out the costs?

Sure but I don’t see anything tangible from the female consorts at all. Phillip was an exception - not only a man but a Navy Commander who went on tours for half a year away at a time on his own. He wanted to establish his independence. I don’t see anything similar from Elizabeth’s mother, grandmother or her daughter-in-law.

I’ve been told that the Queen Mother was instrumental in helping people keep their spirits up during WWII. I realize that’s probably both arguable and intangible, but I can see a huge value in that. I’m imagining, for example, what these past two years might have been like with a small number of familiar, reassuring, and even trusted voices, united in providing guidance and support and perhaps a shared identity as we’ve stumbled through COVID.

As for the other consorts, if you value what the monarchs themselves do, I guess it’s not a huge step to value the small number of people who support them in ways that allow them to do their jobs more effectively. I’m not arguing either way though.

The Queen Mother managed to get her sickly husband to donate enough sperm so that she could be artificially inseminated and add vigor to the weak German line. She died at 101 and her husband died at 57.

what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My answer is shaped by the fact that years of my tax money went to maintaining this family of grifters. I think the monarchy has to go. These people are parasites, Camilla included. Her only accomplishment is her relationship with Charles, and she doesn’t deserve to be maintained for that.

If she weren’t a grifter living off the public purse, I would view her merely as a physically unattractive, not very bright woman married to an ugly, unintelligent man who selfishly put his own needs over those of his small children.

Honest question here - none of the consorts have done anything consequential in the UK. So what were you expecting?

DP: Would you view the Duke of Edinburg Award as something significant? (I genuinely don’t know the extent of its impact.)
Many members of the family are very involved in charitable endeavors, raising money and calling attention to specific causes. Do the benefits— tangible and intangible— seem to at least balance out the costs?

Sure but I don’t see anything tangible from the female consorts at all. Phillip was an exception - not only a man but a Navy Commander who went on tours for half a year away at a time on his own. He wanted to establish his independence. I don’t see anything similar from Elizabeth’s mother, grandmother or her daughter-in-law.

I’ve been told that the Queen Mother was instrumental in helping people keep their spirits up during WWII. I realize that’s probably both arguable and intangible, but I can see a huge value in that. I’m imagining, for example, what these past two years might have been like with a small number of familiar, reassuring, and even trusted voices, united in providing guidance and support and perhaps a shared identity as we’ve stumbled through COVID.

As for the other consorts, if you value what the monarchs themselves do, I guess it’s not a huge step to value the small number of people who support them in ways that allow them to do their jobs more effectively. I’m not arguing either way though.

The Queen Mother managed to get her sickly husband to donate enough sperm so that she could be artificially inseminated and add vigor to the weak German line. She died at 101 and her husband died at 57.

what?

Yes, what?! With the turkey baster? Or whatever they use, as they don't have Thanksgiving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Camilla = Patron Saint of Side Pieces. I am sure that she inspires hope for so many.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As if she was unfairly victimized. I mean, wow. The only reason she was "one of the most despised woman in the world" is because she chose to f*ck a married man. And she was doing it while she was also married, so that's just fabulous. What a role model, she's like a forerunner for Wonder Woman or something.

And yeah. Obviously she's going to get treated "like a second-class citizen for years" - because that's what a mistress is. A mistress is not a wife. That's also why she took the backseat and avoided the limelight, by the way. Not because she's some humble Mother Theresa, but because she's savvy about PR and she knows the public won't be thrilled that Charles' aggressive, possessive side piece - the same side piece who bullied Diana during Diana's entire marriage - is now flaunting her jewels and her man. Plus, she was already an old woman by the time she married Charles. Would be in very bad taste for an aging mistress-turned-wife to now act the princess when Kate Middleton was already around to take that role.

+100

SPOT ON. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Time to move on, she deserves her place. She works hard, doesn’t complain and it’s down to earth ( as much as possible in her position ).

I do enjoy Tracey Ullman's version of Camilla. If I had got to have a G&T with a royal family member, Camilla would be high up on the list.

+1 - the tales that dame could tell.

She isn't going to tell you anything. Kanga was pushed out a window and Diana murdered in a tunnel because they couldn't keep their moves shut.

Who is Kanga?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As if she was unfairly victimized. I mean, wow. The only reason she was "one of the most despised woman in the world" is because she chose to f*ck a married man. And she was doing it while she was also married, so that's just fabulous. What a role model, she's like a forerunner for Wonder Woman or something.

And yeah. Obviously she's going to get treated "like a second-class citizen for years" - because that's what a mistress is. A mistress is not a wife. That's also why she took the backseat and avoided the limelight, by the way. Not because she's some humble Mother Theresa, but because she's savvy about PR and she knows the public won't be thrilled that Charles' aggressive, possessive side piece - the same side piece who bullied Diana during Diana's entire marriage - is now flaunting her jewels and her man. Plus, she was already an old woman by the time she married Charles. Would be in very bad taste for an aging mistress-turned-wife to now act the princess when Kate Middleton was already around to take that role.

+100

SPOT ON. Thank you.

Yep all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My answer is shaped by the fact that years of my tax money went to maintaining this family of grifters. I think the monarchy has to go. These people are parasites, Camilla included. Her only accomplishment is her relationship with Charles, and she doesn’t deserve to be maintained for that.

If she weren’t a grifter living off the public purse, I would view her merely as a physically unattractive, not very bright woman married to an ugly, unintelligent man who selfishly put his own needs over those of his small children.

Honest question here - none of the consorts have done anything consequential in the UK. So what were you expecting?

DP: Would you view the Duke of Edinburg Award as something significant? (I genuinely don’t know the extent of its impact.)
Many members of the family are very involved in charitable endeavors, raising money and calling attention to specific causes. Do the benefits— tangible and intangible— seem to at least balance out the costs?

Sure but I don’t see anything tangible from the female consorts at all. Phillip was an exception - not only a man but a Navy Commander who went on tours for half a year away at a time on his own. He wanted to establish his independence. I don’t see anything similar from Elizabeth’s mother, grandmother or her daughter-in-law.

I’ve been told that the Queen Mother was instrumental in helping people keep their spirits up during WWII. I realize that’s probably both arguable and intangible, but I can see a huge value in that. I’m imagining, for example, what these past two years might have been like with a small number of familiar, reassuring, and even trusted voices, united in providing guidance and support and perhaps a shared identity as we’ve stumbled through COVID.

As for the other consorts, if you value what the monarchs themselves do, I guess it’s not a huge step to value the small number of people who support them in ways that allow them to do their jobs more effectively. I’m not arguing either way though.

The Queen Mother managed to get her sickly husband to donate enough sperm so that she could be artificially inseminated and add vigor to the weak German line. She died at 101 and her husband died at 57.

what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Time to move on, she deserves her place. She works hard, doesn’t complain and it’s down to earth ( as much as possible in her position ).

I do enjoy Tracey Ullman's version of Camilla. If I had got to have a G&T with a royal family member, Camilla would be high up on the list.

+1 - the tales that dame could tell.

She isn't going to tell you anything. Kanga was pushed out a window and Diana murdered in a tunnel because they couldn't keep their moves shut.

Who is Kanga?

The wife of Charles’ best friend that was a romantic rival to Camilla. She doesn’t get much air time with the white washed “yes what we did was horrible but we’re soulmates” rewrite of Charles and Camilla’s relationship.