Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They should go after these women, what they did is lie and literally affect the entire country. Jail them


Says the liar.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Breaking news:

"Climate change to cause global beer shortage, study says" By Susan Scutti, CNN

Bart O'Kavanaugh is going to be REALLY UPSET about this!


Swing and a miss.
Anonymous
Flip and a bird?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Breaking news:

"Climate change to cause global beer shortage, study says" By Susan Scutti, CNN

Bart O'Kavanaugh is going to be REALLY UPSET about this!

On the bright side, he's a half-keg full kind of guy.
Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are MoCo Police still searching microfiche records for the report Swetnick says was filed when she was 19?[/quote]

Even if they were it would tell them nothing. His name wouldn't be listed. Her only accusation was accusing him of attending the party. Not sure why she doesn't understand that she's holding him accountable to the same thing she is saying herself. That she was there too.[/quote]

What if MoCo police find her complaint, and it jogs someone's memory and then another witness or two comes forward? What if Mark Judge has a twelve step moment and feels he has to come clean and confess to what he told his college girlfriend? Stranger things have happened...
Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are MoCo Police still searching microfiche records for the report Swetnick says was filed when she was 19?[/quote]

Even if they were it would tell them nothing. His name wouldn't be listed. Her only accusation was accusing him of attending the party. Not sure why she doesn't understand that she's holding him accountable to the same thing she is saying herself. That she was there too.[/quote]

What if MoCo police find her complaint, and it jogs someone's memory and then another witness or two comes forward? What if Mark Judge has a twelve step moment and feels he has to come clean and confess to what he told his college girlfriend? Stranger things have happened...[/quote]

Tin foil says what?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If this had involved a black man and a 15 year white girl, you Kavanaugh supporters would have been calling for his head. No trial, straight to execution. Meanwhile, a white man is just "boys will be boys".


Your accusation is absolutely not true for me. As I've said before multiple times on this thread, I don't think ANYONE (man OR woman) should have their reputation ruined and lives turned upside down with uncorroborated accusations that are decades old and as full of holes as Dr. Ford's.


Come off it. You would never have sat by and let this happen if it was a black man accused of attempted rape of a 15 year old white girl--stop lying! And the allegations are NOT uncorroborated. A thorough investigation of such serious allegations could not possibly have been conducted in one week. It was a sham. You'll obviously never have the decency to admit it, but it was. But hey, you won--that's all that matters to you and your Glorious Leader.


DP. Your injection of race into this discussion is bizarre.


Your refusal to acknowledge that this Kavanaugh debacle is white male patriarchal entitlement on display is bizarre and evasive.


I would certainly hope that all of us would be able to refute allegations with no corroboration. I think dismissing that as "white male patriarchal entitlement" is a shame. If I were accused without foundation, I would fully embrace "white male patriarchal entitlement" in order to refute my accusers claims.


Exactly. And I'm not a male, but if I were falsely accused of something, there is no way I would cower and walk away in shame. I'd do exactly what Kavanaugh did, which was defend himself. I don't consider that "entitlement" of any kind.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's too easy to get you pathetic Kavanaugh rape apologists all worked up. Here's a virtual rag to wipe the spittle off your double chins.


On the contrary, Kavanaugh defenders aren't getting worked up at all. We just keep throwing your nonsense claims right back at you. Just because you keep insisting there was "evidence" and "corroboration" doesn't make it so. You seem to be getting upset over the fact that you can't twist this into something it's not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's too easy to get you pathetic Kavanaugh rape apologists all worked up. Here's a virtual rag to wipe the spittle off your double chins.


Sick burn.


Sounds to me like the PP is in dire need of a rag to wipe off his/her own frothing spittle. It's so upsetting when they can't just accuse someone of something and get away with it!
Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are MoCo Police still searching microfiche records for the report Swetnick says was filed when she was 19?[/quote]

Even if they were it would tell them nothing. His name wouldn't be listed. Her only accusation was accusing him of attending the party. Not sure why she doesn't understand that she's holding him accountable to the same thing she is saying herself. That she was there too.[/quote]

What if MoCo police find her complaint, and it jogs someone's memory and then another witness or two comes forward? What if Mark Judge has a twelve step moment and feels he has to come clean and confess to what he told his college girlfriend? Stranger things have happened...[/quote]

Tin foil says what?[/quote]

What motivation did Judge’s former girlfriend have to say Judge confesses to gang rape of drunk girls, you smug idiot?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are MoCo Police still searching microfiche records for the report Swetnick says was filed when she was 19?


Even if they were it would tell them nothing. His name wouldn't be listed. Her only accusation was accusing him of attending the party. Not sure why she doesn't understand that she's holding him accountable to the same thing she is saying herself. That she was there too.


THIS! He was (allegedly) at the same party she was. So?? That video interview of hers was hilarious in that it showed so clearly how she was making this all up as she went along. She thought she was clever by mentioning his "school uniform" and how "proud" he was of it. Even though there was no school uniform. Then she walked back her claims of him "spiking the punch" and changed it to just seeing him near the punch bowl. Then she back tracked on her claim that he was part of that wacko "train gang rape" by saying, well, maybe he wasn't - but he was definitely in the house!

And all the while, she admits she returned to those parties (which no one in Mont. Co. has ever corroborated) TEN times. Yeah, she's not a train wreck at all.
Anonymous
There will always be * next to Bart's name. FOREVER.

I mean ***************************************

Bart is a DB.

He sounds like he has marbles in his mouth when he speaks. Thought Prep could do a better job there . . .

Anyhow, the only reason he is in the position he is in is because a CON MAN is running our country. The con man will need to be pardoned at some point (or his douche baggy son will) and that is why Bart is where he is. Because he was bought as was Trump.

Seriously DISGUSTING.




Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are MoCo Police still searching microfiche records for the report Swetnick says was filed when she was 19?[/quote]

Even if they were it would tell them nothing. His name wouldn't be listed. Her only accusation was accusing him of attending the party. Not sure why she doesn't understand that she's holding him accountable to the same thing she is saying herself. That she was there too.[/quote]

What if MoCo police find her complaint, and it jogs someone's memory and then another witness or two comes forward? What if Mark Judge has a twelve step moment and feels he has to come clean and confess to what he told his college girlfriend? Stranger things have happened...[/quote]

Do you write bad crime fiction for a living? :roll:
Anonymous
There will always be * next to Bart's name. FOREVER.

I mean ***************************************

Bart is a DB.

He sounds like he has marbles in his mouth when he speaks. Thought Prep could do a better job there . . .

Anyhow, the only reason he is in the position he is in is because a CON MAN is running our country. The con man will need to be pardoned at some point (or his douche baggy son will) and that is why Bart is where he is. Because he was bought as was Trump.

Seriously DISGUSTING.




Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There will always be * next to Bart's name. FOREVER.

I mean ***************************************

Bart is a DB.

He sounds like he has marbles in his mouth when he speaks. Thought Prep could do a better job there . . .

Anyhow, the only reason he is in the position he is in is because a CON MAN is running our country. The con man will need to be pardoned at some point (or his douche baggy son will) and that is why Bart is where he is. Because he was bought as was Trump.

Seriously DISGUSTING.


Speaking of disgusting... every word out of your mouth is. You sound like you have serious issues to harbor such hate against a man who has done nothing.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: