Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?

So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.

There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.

Are you struggling to read the testimony linked? It’s forced. These women were forced by law to deliver skulless babies and watch them die, to suffer preventable infections from non-viable pregnancies. You can say all you want you’re “against” this (though you’ve taken no action to stop it) but you cannot deny women are being forced to give birth in the US right now.

+1

The “health care field” (office drone) worker thinks that by saying she wants exceptions means that these women won’t have watched their babies die. She claims not to be religious but uses the same magical thinking as evangelicals and fundies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?

So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.

There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.

Are you struggling to read the testimony linked? It’s forced. These women were forced by law to deliver skulless babies and watch them die, to suffer preventable infections from non-viable pregnancies. You can say all you want you’re “against” this (though you’ve taken no action to stop it) but you cannot deny women are being forced to give birth in the US right now.

+1

The “health care field” (office drone) worker thinks that by saying she wants exceptions means that these women won’t have watched their babies die. She claims not to be religious but uses the same magical thinking as evangelicals and fundies.

People in healthcare are aware of the existence of the placenta. I don’t think she’s in healthcare

[Anonymous]

Says a lot.

[Anonymous]

This is one of the state’s witnesses in the case against Texas today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the state’s witnesses in the case against Texas today.

Omg. She can force her own daughter to give birth at 9 but she better stay far away from the rest of our daughters.

[Anonymous]

Here it is. Jailed for having an abortion.

*but you all said this would never happen*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?

So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.

There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.

Regrettably there is often an overlap between bans on abortions and bans on contraception. Guessing it is not coincidental.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?

So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.

There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.

Tell it to the rapists and those who perform incestuous acts on women.

Rape makes up less than 1% abortions. Most abortions are out of convenience. I said we need to make exception for rape and incest.

Instead of killing an innocent human life, why don’t you teach yourself and your daughters how to take accountability and have responsible sex of abstain until they can provide for a baby?

Getting pregnant is preventable. Learn to take accountability.

But not for health reasons. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?

So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.

There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.

Are you struggling to read the testimony linked? It’s forced. These women were forced by law to deliver skulless babies and watch them die, to suffer preventable infections from non-viable pregnancies. You can say all you want you’re “against” this (though you’ve taken no action to stop it) but you cannot deny women are being forced to give birth in the US right now.

+1

The “health care field” (office drone) worker thinks that by saying she wants exceptions means that these women won’t have watched their babies die. She claims not to be religious but uses the same magical thinking as evangelicals and fundies.

People in healthcare are aware of the existence of the placenta. I don’t think she’s in healthcare

Oooh I got it! She works at one of those lying forced birther places where they trick women into keeping pregnancies they wanted to abort! It would explain why she’s so confused and so propagandized on so many points.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the state’s witnesses in the case against Texas today.

👏🏻 The 👏🏻 cruelty 👏🏻 is 👏🏻 the 👏🏻 point

Can you imagine hating your own sex so much that you think a 9 year old child, legally incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse, should be sentenced to a chance of death via pregnancy and birth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?

So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.

There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.

Are you struggling to read the testimony linked? It’s forced. These women were forced by law to deliver skulless babies and watch them die, to suffer preventable infections from non-viable pregnancies. You can say all you want you’re “against” this (though you’ve taken no action to stop it) but you cannot deny women are being forced to give birth in the US right now.

+1

The “health care field” (office drone) worker thinks that by saying she wants exceptions means that these women won’t have watched their babies die. She claims not to be religious but uses the same magical thinking as evangelicals and fundies.

People in healthcare are aware of the existence of the placenta. I don’t think she’s in healthcare

Oooh I got it! She works at one of those lying forced birther places where they trick women into keeping pregnancies they wanted to abort! It would explain why she’s so confused and so propagandized on so many points.

Oh gosh that probably is it. She sounds like she’d be the kind of person to do this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/07/03/crisis-pregnancy-center-lawsuit-massachusetts/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?

So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.

There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.

Are you struggling to read the testimony linked? It’s forced. These women were forced by law to deliver skulless babies and watch them die, to suffer preventable infections from non-viable pregnancies. You can say all you want you’re “against” this (though you’ve taken no action to stop it) but you cannot deny women are being forced to give birth in the US right now.

+1

The “health care field” (office drone) worker thinks that by saying she wants exceptions means that these women won’t have watched their babies die. She claims not to be religious but uses the same magical thinking as evangelicals and fundies.

People in healthcare are aware of the existence of the placenta. I don’t think she’s in healthcare

Oooh I got it! She works at one of those lying forced birther places where they trick women into keeping pregnancies they wanted to abort! It would explain why she’s so confused and so propagandized on so many points.

Oh gosh that probably is it. She sounds like she’d be the kind of person to do this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/07/03/crisis-pregnancy-center-lawsuit-massachusetts/

Yup. And then file it under “whoopsie daisy, chalk it up to Eve’s curse. The lady had it coming for” what did the forced birther keep saying, “spreading her legs”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the state’s witnesses in the case against Texas today.

👏🏻 The 👏🏻 cruelty 👏🏻 is 👏🏻 the 👏🏻 point

Can you imagine hating your own sex so much that you think a 9 year old child, legally incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse, should be sentenced to a chance of death via pregnancy and birth?

Can you imagine being in Texas and saying literally anyone “could give birth without health risks” given their maternal mortality rates?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the state’s witnesses in the case against Texas today.

👏🏻 The 👏🏻 cruelty 👏🏻 is 👏🏻 the 👏🏻 point

Can you imagine hating your own sex so much that you think a 9 year old child, legally incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse, should be sentenced to a chance of death via pregnancy and birth?

Can you imagine being in Texas and saying literally anyone “could give birth without health risks” given their maternal mortality rates?!?

+1 Maternal mortality rates have also been on the rise in Texas over the past two decades, increasing from 10.3 deaths per 100,000 live births in 1999 to 21.9 in 2019.

Also in Texas, infant deaths rose by 227 in 2022 under the abortion ban compared to 2021, in part because of unviable pregnancies forced to be carried to term.

From testimony in the Texas lawsuit yesterday:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the state’s witnesses in the case against Texas today.

👏🏻 The 👏🏻 cruelty 👏🏻 is 👏🏻 the 👏🏻 point

Can you imagine hating your own sex so much that you think a 9 year old child, legally incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse, should be sentenced to a chance of death via pregnancy and birth?

Can you imagine being in Texas and saying literally anyone “could give birth without health risks” given their maternal mortality rates?!?

+1 Maternal mortality rates have also been on the rise in Texas over the past two decades, increasing from 10.3 deaths per 100,000 live births in 1999 to 21.9 in 2019.

Also in Texas, infant deaths rose by 227 in 2022 under the abortion ban compared to 2021, in part because of unviable pregnancies forced to be carried to term.

From testimony in the Texas lawsuit yesterday:

Absolutely horrific. It is undeniable that the forced-birthers are causing significant death and suffering. "Pro-life" is a lie.