OK. Grab a pencil and paper. Ready? School A has scores 1,2,3,4,5. School B has scores 2,3,4,5,6. A score of 5 is 70%ile across the district A+B , 80%ile at school A, and 60%ile at school B. A score of 6 is 90%ile across the district, 80%ile at school B, and 100%ile at school A. Now see if you can construct your own example that demonstrates the same phenomenon. |
ok, again: what do you mean by "far represented". how many percent of MCPS students is at the 99th MAP percentile? how many of those in the W cluster? |
You still don't understand what a percentile means. To score in the 99th percentile means a kid had to score higher than 99% of other kids taking the test. If they scored in your mythical 100th percentile, that means they scored higher than 100% of the other kids taking the test -- which means they had to score HIGHER THAN THEIR OWN SCORE. No matter what school they attend, no matter what schools you compare, no matter what boundaries you use to calculate, that is simply impossible. |
This isn't data MCPS has ever released, but there was a report several years ago showing the number of "highly able" learners per middle school cluster, I think. |
Im not saying this is some contest, as disadvantaged kids are disadvantaged, period. However if you look at the numbers in, say, Baltimore City, and compare them to MCPS, MCPS comes out far ahead in scores. Moreover, MCPS has large clusters of overachievers. For example just look at NMSF lists if you want an indicator of 99th percentile. They are disproportionately clustered in MCPS and HCPS for the state. And MD top percentile scores are usually higher in MD than other states. This is driven mostly by MCPS and HCPS. |
NP. Yeah I don’t know what this argument is about but there is no such thing as 100% percentile. It’s just not a thing mathematically. Why don’t you just say 99.9 percentile if that’s what you mean, PP. |