But it's step one in reducing the impact of Common Core as well. |
Oh? How? |
| Common Core background assumes testing. |
I'm tired of this assertion too. There is nothing in the Common Core standards that requires annual testing. |
|
"the standards can be used to develop broader assessment frameworks"
from the criteria for the development of common core standards. |
| NCLB was law when CC was developed. Of course, annual testing was assumed. |
It's hard to imagine a more general, non-committal, appearing-to-say-something-without-actually-saying-anything statement than that. |
+1 The culture of high stakes testing had already been established and the law was already in place. |
LOL. I do my legwork during the day. It's 8:46 p.m. and I've already emailed my congressman and senators today. I do attend party functions, but there isn't one right this minute. You are my entertainment for the moment. |
So, we were right: States adopted Common Core before the standards were even written. And Chad Colby is probably lying. |
How about you go state by state, for states that adopted the Common Core standards, to find out when the state adopted the Common Core standards. Here, I'll get you started! Maryland adopted the Common Core standards on June 22, 2010. http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/pressrelease_details/2010_06_22.html |
So, this is why you support Common Core? Because your party does? Great independent thinking. |
So Maryland adopted them a few weeks after the standards were written. Gee, bet they put a lot of thought into that! |
Focus, please. We are talking about whether or not states adopted the standards before they were issued. Maryland adopted the standards after they were issued. |
The top PP is actually opposes the Common Core standards. |