What colleges are in Boston College's tier group?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Georgetown and Notre Dame are above BC. BC's peer groups are more like Tufts, Northeastern, Holy Cross, NYU, Wake, UVA, etc.

Most students at BC had their first choice be Georgetown or Notre Dame I'm sure.

UVA hater. UVa is also better, NYU too.

UVA and BC are the same tier to anyone not affiliated with UVA or BC.

Not at all. UVA has a much better reputation among people who matter and the alumni connections are better. It’s also ridiculous how much “community” and “student life” is thrown around when boosting BC when Boston has the strictest bars and there are no fraternities. If you want to have a couple shots in your dorm room and call it a wild Friday night at 11pm then go to BC.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, and your response is mostly just speculation about “people who matter.” They’re the same thing.

BC has horrible student life once you move beyond watching thugs on a football field or basketball court. There are no fraternities and Boston bars actually card you to see if you’re 21.

People who matter don’t hold BC in high regard or in the same regard as NYU WUSTL UCLA Emory. Do I need to be clearer? What confuses you? Do Jesuit schools no longer teach logic and reasoning?

More nonsensical bs. The first paragraph has nothing to do with school, just your personal crusade against Boston, which I don’t care about.

Still no actual analysis, pure speculative BS. I’m not affiliated with Boston College, but I can reason you have serious emotional issues

Got it, student life has no place when assessing schools or where to go. Please be clearer next time.

You take this forum and BC way too seriously. 😳

I’ve never seen someone so delusional and trying so hard to get a response out of someone.

MIT is rigorous and intense. I’m not going to rank it lower or say it isn’t peers with more “fun” schools, because that’s a silly take. Your posts are silly, and you live off of trolling people with your crappy ideas, because it fills the loneliness in your heart and covers up your overwhelming issues AA a failure.

No when analyzing schools I don’t weigh “ability to get away with a fake id” over education. Sorry if that’s not what “the people who matter” want.

BC shills have consistently pointed to community life and student well being as a reason to go to BC. I didn’t bring it up.

MIT actually has a very hard partying weekend life on and off campus that is more fun than BC.

Rich kids who make their mark go to bars on weekends. So do brilliant PhDs without two pennies to rub together. Only a troll stays in their dorm all day like at BC after fanboying some mediocre linebacker.

Np, they have fun off campus at MIT but BC students don’t have access to that same fun? I’m sniffing a ton of BS from these posts, and think some of you are Russian bots. The lack of reasoning skills is telling.

Have you taken an uber from chestnut hill to Cambridge and back? Want to do that every weekend night? Have you seen the kind of people who go to Brighton bars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Georgetown and Notre Dame are above BC. BC's peer groups are more like Tufts, Northeastern, Holy Cross, NYU, Wake, UVA, etc.

Most students at BC had their first choice be Georgetown or Notre Dame I'm sure.

UVA hater. UVa is also better, NYU too.

UVA and BC are the same tier to anyone not affiliated with UVA or BC.

Not at all. UVA has a much better reputation among people who matter and the alumni connections are better. It’s also ridiculous how much “community” and “student life” is thrown around when boosting BC when Boston has the strictest bars and there are no fraternities. If you want to have a couple shots in your dorm room and call it a wild Friday night at 11pm then go to BC.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, and your response is mostly just speculation about “people who matter.” They’re the same thing.

BC has horrible student life once you move beyond watching thugs on a football field or basketball court. There are no fraternities and Boston bars actually card you to see if you’re 21.

People who matter don’t hold BC in high regard or in the same regard as NYU WUSTL UCLA Emory. Do I need to be clearer? What confuses you? Do Jesuit schools no longer teach logic and reasoning?

More nonsensical bs. The first paragraph has nothing to do with school, just your personal crusade against Boston, which I don’t care about.

Still no actual analysis, pure speculative BS. I’m not affiliated with Boston College, but I can reason you have serious emotional issues

Got it, student life has no place when assessing schools or where to go. Please be clearer next time.

You take this forum and BC way too seriously. 😳

I’ve never seen someone so delusional and trying so hard to get a response out of someone.

MIT is rigorous and intense. I’m not going to rank it lower or say it isn’t peers with more “fun” schools, because that’s a silly take. Your posts are silly, and you live off of trolling people with your crappy ideas, because it fills the loneliness in your heart and covers up your overwhelming issues AA a failure.

No when analyzing schools I don’t weigh “ability to get away with a fake id” over education. Sorry if that’s not what “the people who matter” want.

BC shills have consistently pointed to community life and student well being as a reason to go to BC. I didn’t bring it up.

MIT actually has a very hard partying weekend life on and off campus that is more fun than BC.

Rich kids who make their mark go to bars on weekends. So do brilliant PhDs without two pennies to rub together. Only a troll stays in their dorm all day like at BC after fanboying some mediocre linebacker.

Np, they have fun off campus at MIT but BC students don’t have access to that same fun? I’m sniffing a ton of BS from these posts, and think some of you are Russian bots. The lack of reasoning skills is telling.

We are now at the “anyone who criticizes BC is a Russian saboteur” stage of denial

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Georgetown and Notre Dame are above BC. BC's peer groups are more like Tufts, Northeastern, Holy Cross, NYU, Wake, UVA, etc.

Most students at BC had their first choice be Georgetown or Notre Dame I'm sure.

UVA hater. UVa is also better, NYU too.

UVA and BC are the same tier to anyone not affiliated with UVA or BC.

Not at all. UVA has a much better reputation among people who matter and the alumni connections are better. It’s also ridiculous how much “community” and “student life” is thrown around when boosting BC when Boston has the strictest bars and there are no fraternities. If you want to have a couple shots in your dorm room and call it a wild Friday night at 11pm then go to BC.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, and your response is mostly just speculation about “people who matter.” They’re the same thing.

BC has horrible student life once you move beyond watching thugs on a football field or basketball court. There are no fraternities and Boston bars actually card you to see if you’re 21.

People who matter don’t hold BC in high regard or in the same regard as NYU WUSTL UCLA Emory. Do I need to be clearer? What confuses you? Do Jesuit schools no longer teach logic and reasoning?

More nonsensical bs. The first paragraph has nothing to do with school, just your personal crusade against Boston, which I don’t care about.

Still no actual analysis, pure speculative BS. I’m not affiliated with Boston College, but I can reason you have serious emotional issues

Got it, student life has no place when assessing schools or where to go. Please be clearer next time.

You take this forum and BC way too seriously. 😳

I’ve never seen someone so delusional and trying so hard to get a response out of someone.

MIT is rigorous and intense. I’m not going to rank it lower or say it isn’t peers with more “fun” schools, because that’s a silly take. Your posts are silly, and you live off of trolling people with your crappy ideas, because it fills the loneliness in your heart and covers up your overwhelming issues AA a failure.

No when analyzing schools I don’t weigh “ability to get away with a fake id” over education. Sorry if that’s not what “the people who matter” want.

BC shills have consistently pointed to community life and student well being as a reason to go to BC. I didn’t bring it up.

MIT actually has a very hard partying weekend life on and off campus that is more fun than BC.

Rich kids who make their mark go to bars on weekends. So do brilliant PhDs without two pennies to rub together. Only a troll stays in their dorm all day like at BC after fanboying some mediocre linebacker.

Np, they have fun off campus at MIT but BC students don’t have access to that same fun? I’m sniffing a ton of BS from these posts, and think some of you are Russian bots. The lack of reasoning skills is telling.

Have you taken an uber from chestnut hill to Cambridge and back? Want to do that every weekend night? Have you seen the kind of people who go to Brighton bars?

Just not my question at all. They aren’t even that far apart, Boston isn’t massive and it takes no time to light rail around. This just sounds, once again, like propaganda to divide people.

[Anonymous]

MIT is a bit like Bucknell where there’s so many opportunities for parties and fun! BC is more a Lehigh, which is a bummer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Georgetown and Notre Dame are above BC. BC's peer groups are more like Tufts, Northeastern, Holy Cross, NYU, Wake, UVA, etc.

Most students at BC had their first choice be Georgetown or Notre Dame I'm sure.

UVA hater. UVa is also better, NYU too.

UVA and BC are the same tier to anyone not affiliated with UVA or BC.

Not at all. UVA has a much better reputation among people who matter and the alumni connections are better. It’s also ridiculous how much “community” and “student life” is thrown around when boosting BC when Boston has the strictest bars and there are no fraternities. If you want to have a couple shots in your dorm room and call it a wild Friday night at 11pm then go to BC.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, and your response is mostly just speculation about “people who matter.” They’re the same thing.

BC has horrible student life once you move beyond watching thugs on a football field or basketball court. There are no fraternities and Boston bars actually card you to see if you’re 21.

People who matter don’t hold BC in high regard or in the same regard as NYU WUSTL UCLA Emory. Do I need to be clearer? What confuses you? Do Jesuit schools no longer teach logic and reasoning?

More nonsensical bs. The first paragraph has nothing to do with school, just your personal crusade against Boston, which I don’t care about.

Still no actual analysis, pure speculative BS. I’m not affiliated with Boston College, but I can reason you have serious emotional issues

Got it, student life has no place when assessing schools or where to go. Please be clearer next time.

You take this forum and BC way too seriously. 😳

I’ve never seen someone so delusional and trying so hard to get a response out of someone.

MIT is rigorous and intense. I’m not going to rank it lower or say it isn’t peers with more “fun” schools, because that’s a silly take. Your posts are silly, and you live off of trolling people with your crappy ideas, because it fills the loneliness in your heart and covers up your overwhelming issues AA a failure.

No when analyzing schools I don’t weigh “ability to get away with a fake id” over education. Sorry if that’s not what “the people who matter” want.

BC shills have consistently pointed to community life and student well being as a reason to go to BC. I didn’t bring it up.

MIT actually has a very hard partying weekend life on and off campus that is more fun than BC.

Rich kids who make their mark go to bars on weekends. So do brilliant PhDs without two pennies to rub together. Only a troll stays in their dorm all day like at BC after fanboying some mediocre linebacker.

Np, they have fun off campus at MIT but BC students don’t have access to that same fun? I’m sniffing a ton of BS from these posts, and think some of you are Russian bots. The lack of reasoning skills is telling.

Have you taken an uber from chestnut hill to Cambridge and back? Want to do that every weekend night? Have you seen the kind of people who go to Brighton bars?

Just not my question at all. They aren’t even that far apart, Boston isn’t massive and it takes no time to light rail around. This just sounds, once again, like propaganda to divide people.

That is a long T ride and it doesn’t run late. Taking Ubers like that regularly is out of the budget of most BC students. If you want easier access to bars when you’re 21 (since Boston cards), go to MIT. It shouldn’t be tough since it’s a similar caliber school as BC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MIT is a bit like Bucknell where there’s so many opportunities for parties and fun! BC is more a Lehigh, which is a bummer.

I’d rather have access to Cambridge bars and go to class with real students over being a BC student and it’s not a close call. Not everyone wants to go to losing ACC games every Friday and go to sleep right after.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Georgetown and Notre Dame are above BC. BC's peer groups are more like Tufts, Northeastern, Holy Cross, NYU, Wake, UVA, etc.

Most students at BC had their first choice be Georgetown or Notre Dame I'm sure.

UVA hater. UVa is also better, NYU too.

UVA and BC are the same tier to anyone not affiliated with UVA or BC.

Not at all. UVA has a much better reputation among people who matter and the alumni connections are better. It’s also ridiculous how much “community” and “student life” is thrown around when boosting BC when Boston has the strictest bars and there are no fraternities. If you want to have a couple shots in your dorm room and call it a wild Friday night at 11pm then go to BC.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, and your response is mostly just speculation about “people who matter.” They’re the same thing.

BC has horrible student life once you move beyond watching thugs on a football field or basketball court. There are no fraternities and Boston bars actually card you to see if you’re 21.

People who matter don’t hold BC in high regard or in the same regard as NYU WUSTL UCLA Emory. Do I need to be clearer? What confuses you? Do Jesuit schools no longer teach logic and reasoning?

More nonsensical bs. The first paragraph has nothing to do with school, just your personal crusade against Boston, which I don’t care about.

Still no actual analysis, pure speculative BS. I’m not affiliated with Boston College, but I can reason you have serious emotional issues

Got it, student life has no place when assessing schools or where to go. Please be clearer next time.

You take this forum and BC way too seriously. 😳

I’ve never seen someone so delusional and trying so hard to get a response out of someone.

MIT is rigorous and intense. I’m not going to rank it lower or say it isn’t peers with more “fun” schools, because that’s a silly take. Your posts are silly, and you live off of trolling people with your crappy ideas, because it fills the loneliness in your heart and covers up your overwhelming issues AA a failure.

No when analyzing schools I don’t weigh “ability to get away with a fake id” over education. Sorry if that’s not what “the people who matter” want.

BC shills have consistently pointed to community life and student well being as a reason to go to BC. I didn’t bring it up.

MIT actually has a very hard partying weekend life on and off campus that is more fun than BC.

Rich kids who make their mark go to bars on weekends. So do brilliant PhDs without two pennies to rub together. Only a troll stays in their dorm all day like at BC after fanboying some mediocre linebacker.

Np, they have fun off campus at MIT but BC students don’t have access to that same fun? I’m sniffing a ton of BS from these posts, and think some of you are Russian bots. The lack of reasoning skills is telling.

Have you taken an uber from chestnut hill to Cambridge and back? Want to do that every weekend night? Have you seen the kind of people who go to Brighton bars?

This only makes sense if MIT students are going off campus to north Cambridge or near Somerville area, which is not that exciting. Anywhere south of that is pretty accessible and easy to get to.

[Anonymous]

A bunch of people who’ve never been to Boston talking I’m about it incorrectly^^^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A bunch of people who’ve never been to Boston talking I’m about it incorrectly^^^^

Yea, they don’t get how inconvenient Chestnut Hill is to get to Boston or Cambridge nightlife. It’s not like NYC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Georgetown and Notre Dame are above BC. BC's peer groups are more like Tufts, Northeastern, Holy Cross, NYU, Wake, UVA, etc.

Most students at BC had their first choice be Georgetown or Notre Dame I'm sure.

UVA hater. UVa is also better, NYU too.

UVA and BC are the same tier to anyone not affiliated with UVA or BC.

Not at all. UVA has a much better reputation among people who matter and the alumni connections are better. It’s also ridiculous how much “community” and “student life” is thrown around when boosting BC when Boston has the strictest bars and there are no fraternities. If you want to have a couple shots in your dorm room and call it a wild Friday night at 11pm then go to BC.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, and your response is mostly just speculation about “people who matter.” They’re the same thing.

BC has horrible student life once you move beyond watching thugs on a football field or basketball court. There are no fraternities and Boston bars actually card you to see if you’re 21.

People who matter don’t hold BC in high regard or in the same regard as NYU WUSTL UCLA Emory. Do I need to be clearer? What confuses you? Do Jesuit schools no longer teach logic and reasoning?

More nonsensical bs. The first paragraph has nothing to do with school, just your personal crusade against Boston, which I don’t care about.

Still no actual analysis, pure speculative BS. I’m not affiliated with Boston College, but I can reason you have serious emotional issues

Got it, student life has no place when assessing schools or where to go. Please be clearer next time.

You take this forum and BC way too seriously. 😳

I’ve never seen someone so delusional and trying so hard to get a response out of someone.

MIT is rigorous and intense. I’m not going to rank it lower or say it isn’t peers with more “fun” schools, because that’s a silly take. Your posts are silly, and you live off of trolling people with your crappy ideas, because it fills the loneliness in your heart and covers up your overwhelming issues AA a failure.

No when analyzing schools I don’t weigh “ability to get away with a fake id” over education. Sorry if that’s not what “the people who matter” want.

BC shills have consistently pointed to community life and student well being as a reason to go to BC. I didn’t bring it up.

MIT actually has a very hard partying weekend life on and off campus that is more fun than BC.

Rich kids who make their mark go to bars on weekends. So do brilliant PhDs without two pennies to rub together. Only a troll stays in their dorm all day like at BC after fanboying some mediocre linebacker.

Np, they have fun off campus at MIT but BC students don’t have access to that same fun? I’m sniffing a ton of BS from these posts, and think some of you are Russian bots. The lack of reasoning skills is telling.

Have you taken an uber from chestnut hill to Cambridge and back? Want to do that every weekend night? Have you seen the kind of people who go to Brighton bars?

Just not my question at all. They aren’t even that far apart, Boston isn’t massive and it takes no time to light rail around. This just sounds, once again, like propaganda to divide people.

That is a long T ride and it doesn’t run late. Taking Ubers like that regularly is out of the budget of most BC students. If you want easier access to bars when you’re 21 (since Boston cards), go to MIT. It shouldn’t be tough since it’s a similar caliber school as BC.

You're not talking about the same BC that costs $90k and most of our kids attend ED1 (aka full pay).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Georgetown and Notre Dame are above BC. BC's peer groups are more like Tufts, Northeastern, Holy Cross, NYU, Wake, UVA, etc.

Most students at BC had their first choice be Georgetown or Notre Dame I'm sure.

UVA hater. UVa is also better, NYU too.

UVA and BC are the same tier to anyone not affiliated with UVA or BC.

Not at all. UVA has a much better reputation among people who matter and the alumni connections are better. It’s also ridiculous how much “community” and “student life” is thrown around when boosting BC when Boston has the strictest bars and there are no fraternities. If you want to have a couple shots in your dorm room and call it a wild Friday night at 11pm then go to BC.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, and your response is mostly just speculation about “people who matter.” They’re the same thing.

BC has horrible student life once you move beyond watching thugs on a football field or basketball court. There are no fraternities and Boston bars actually card you to see if you’re 21.

People who matter don’t hold BC in high regard or in the same regard as NYU WUSTL UCLA Emory. Do I need to be clearer? What confuses you? Do Jesuit schools no longer teach logic and reasoning?

More nonsensical bs. The first paragraph has nothing to do with school, just your personal crusade against Boston, which I don’t care about.

Still no actual analysis, pure speculative BS. I’m not affiliated with Boston College, but I can reason you have serious emotional issues

Got it, student life has no place when assessing schools or where to go. Please be clearer next time.

You take this forum and BC way too seriously. 😳

I’ve never seen someone so delusional and trying so hard to get a response out of someone.

MIT is rigorous and intense. I’m not going to rank it lower or say it isn’t peers with more “fun” schools, because that’s a silly take. Your posts are silly, and you live off of trolling people with your crappy ideas, because it fills the loneliness in your heart and covers up your overwhelming issues AA a failure.

No when analyzing schools I don’t weigh “ability to get away with a fake id” over education. Sorry if that’s not what “the people who matter” want.

BC shills have consistently pointed to community life and student well being as a reason to go to BC. I didn’t bring it up.

MIT actually has a very hard partying weekend life on and off campus that is more fun than BC.

Rich kids who make their mark go to bars on weekends. So do brilliant PhDs without two pennies to rub together. Only a troll stays in their dorm all day like at BC after fanboying some mediocre linebacker.

Np, they have fun off campus at MIT but BC students don’t have access to that same fun? I’m sniffing a ton of BS from these posts, and think some of you are Russian bots. The lack of reasoning skills is telling.

Have you taken an uber from chestnut hill to Cambridge and back? Want to do that every weekend night? Have you seen the kind of people who go to Brighton bars?

This only makes sense if MIT students are going off campus to north Cambridge or near Somerville area, which is not that exciting. Anywhere south of that is pretty accessible and easy to get to.

If you don’t find Somerville exciting you’re not going to like Chestnut Hill or Brighton, at all. It is way more boring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Umiami
NYU
Northeastern
BU
Fordham
Villanova
Holy Cross

I think Emory, ND, Georgetown are a different tier

thread should have ended here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Georgetown and Notre Dame are above BC. BC's peer groups are more like Tufts, Northeastern, Holy Cross, NYU, Wake, UVA, etc.

Most students at BC had their first choice be Georgetown or Notre Dame I'm sure.

UVA hater. UVa is also better, NYU too.

UVA and BC are the same tier to anyone not affiliated with UVA or BC.

Not at all. UVA has a much better reputation among people who matter and the alumni connections are better. It’s also ridiculous how much “community” and “student life” is thrown around when boosting BC when Boston has the strictest bars and there are no fraternities. If you want to have a couple shots in your dorm room and call it a wild Friday night at 11pm then go to BC.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, and your response is mostly just speculation about “people who matter.” They’re the same thing.

BC has horrible student life once you move beyond watching thugs on a football field or basketball court. There are no fraternities and Boston bars actually card you to see if you’re 21.

People who matter don’t hold BC in high regard or in the same regard as NYU WUSTL UCLA Emory. Do I need to be clearer? What confuses you? Do Jesuit schools no longer teach logic and reasoning?

More nonsensical bs. The first paragraph has nothing to do with school, just your personal crusade against Boston, which I don’t care about.

Still no actual analysis, pure speculative BS. I’m not affiliated with Boston College, but I can reason you have serious emotional issues

Got it, student life has no place when assessing schools or where to go. Please be clearer next time.

You take this forum and BC way too seriously. 😳

I’ve never seen someone so delusional and trying so hard to get a response out of someone.

MIT is rigorous and intense. I’m not going to rank it lower or say it isn’t peers with more “fun” schools, because that’s a silly take. Your posts are silly, and you live off of trolling people with your crappy ideas, because it fills the loneliness in your heart and covers up your overwhelming issues AA a failure.

No when analyzing schools I don’t weigh “ability to get away with a fake id” over education. Sorry if that’s not what “the people who matter” want.

BC shills have consistently pointed to community life and student well being as a reason to go to BC. I didn’t bring it up.

MIT actually has a very hard partying weekend life on and off campus that is more fun than BC.

Rich kids who make their mark go to bars on weekends. So do brilliant PhDs without two pennies to rub together. Only a troll stays in their dorm all day like at BC after fanboying some mediocre linebacker.

Np, they have fun off campus at MIT but BC students don’t have access to that same fun? I’m sniffing a ton of BS from these posts, and think some of you are Russian bots. The lack of reasoning skills is telling.

Have you taken an uber from chestnut hill to Cambridge and back? Want to do that every weekend night? Have you seen the kind of people who go to Brighton bars?

Just not my question at all. They aren’t even that far apart, Boston isn’t massive and it takes no time to light rail around. This just sounds, once again, like propaganda to divide people.

That is a long T ride and it doesn’t run late. Taking Ubers like that regularly is out of the budget of most BC students. If you want easier access to bars when you’re 21 (since Boston cards), go to MIT. It shouldn’t be tough since it’s a similar caliber school as BC.

You're not talking about the same BC that costs $90k and most of our kids attend ED1 (aka full pay).

Congrats, your child’s class took out non-dischargeable student loans for a Mickey Mouse degree that gets dragged online for 20+ pages and most of your rebuttals are no better than yelling “Player Haterz”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BC is in no.mans land territory. Honestly is about as prestigious as Georgia Tech or Tufts. All three are respected in certain fields but as a whole they're near the top of the 2nd tier. BC has surprisingly good investment banking placement better than Vanderbilt WashU, Rice, UT. Slightly below Emory/Notre Dame.

Nothing wrong with that.

I agree but the second tier is not elite. UVA and Umich, Wellesley are the very bottom of elite imo. Like scape the barrel bottom.

No one on here or other forums or in high finance says UVA Wellesley UMich are $hit schools. They may think they’re disappointing outcomes for a terrific applicant. Some do say BC is a trash destination.

We're saying the same thing, if would be disappointed but they're best schools I'm willing to pay for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Umiami
NYU
Northeastern
BU
Fordham
Villanova
Holy Cross

I think Emory, ND, Georgetown are a different tier

thread should have ended here

Exactly, with NYU somewhere between those two groups.