IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Again, where are the receipts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what the Republicans want to focus their House majority on? What else are they doing?

Absolutely nothing, say it again.

They literally have not passed any meaningful legislation in the 7 months they have been in control of the House.

Would the Senate approve of, or the current President sign into law, any legislation passed by this House?

Well, if the chamber produced something bipartisan than yes, probably so. But the NDAA bill is hardly bipartisan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.

Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.

Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.

What qualifications does Kushner have to manage such assets? What has his "fund" invested in?

None sequitur to the lack of qualifications related to Hunter, however Jared is a third generation family in the real estate business that goes back almost 70 years and billions invested.

Biden > bidet
Non sequitur > none sequitur

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.

Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.

Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.

What qualifications does Kushner have to manage such assets? What has his "fund" invested in?

None sequitur to the lack of qualifications related to Hunter, however Jared is a third generation family in the real estate business that goes back almost 70 years and billions invested.

which has nothing to do with managing a hedge fund

He's more qualified than someone who sat on the board of Amtrak and an Ukrainian oil company, but don't you concern yourself with that little detail.

Hunter Biden is, or was, a licensed corporate law attorney, versed in Delaware law, where millions of companies, including some of the ones where he served on boards.

Fully qualified, actually.

So its totally above board for Burisma to pay $10 million in legal fees to purchase an American energy company for $20 million? Okay...

Was his compensation the same as the other board members? Yes? Then what is the problem?

The $10 million is over and above Hunters board fee. Quit moving the goalpost like everyone on the left

That was alleged by a disinformation campaign. It isn’t a fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.

Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.

Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.

What qualifications does Kushner have to manage such assets? What has his "fund" invested in?

None sequitur to the lack of qualifications related to Hunter, however Jared is a third generation family in the real estate business that goes back almost 70 years and billions invested.

which has nothing to do with managing a hedge fund

He's more qualified than someone who sat on the board of Amtrak and an Ukrainian oil company, but don't you concern yourself with that little detail.

Hunter Biden is, or was, a licensed corporate law attorney, versed in Delaware law, where millions of companies, including some of the ones where he served on boards.

Fully qualified, actually.

So its totally above board for Burisma to pay $10 million in legal fees to purchase an American energy company for $20 million? Okay...

Was his compensation the same as the other board members? Yes? Then what is the problem?

The $10 million is over and above Hunters board fee. Quit moving the goalpost like everyone on the left

That was alleged by a disinformation campaign. It isn’t a fact.

Just like the disinformation campaign of 'peaceful and patriotic' on j6 that is pending indictment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.

Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.

Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.

What qualifications does Kushner have to manage such assets? What has his "fund" invested in?

None sequitur to the lack of qualifications related to Hunter, however Jared is a third generation family in the real estate business that goes back almost 70 years and billions invested.

which has nothing to do with managing a hedge fund

He's more qualified than someone who sat on the board of Amtrak and an Ukrainian oil company, but don't you concern yourself with that little detail.

Hunter Biden is, or was, a licensed corporate law attorney, versed in Delaware law, where millions of companies, including some of the ones where he served on boards.

Fully qualified, actually.

So its totally above board for Burisma to pay $10 million in legal fees to purchase an American energy company for $20 million? Okay...

Was his compensation the same as the other board members? Yes? Then what is the problem?

The $10 million is over and above Hunters board fee. Quit moving the goalpost like everyone on the left

There’s no evidence of this $10m. It’s an uncorroborated third hand allegation. And the republicans subpoenaed hunters bank accounts so if there was such a payment they could show it. Where is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.

Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.

Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.

What qualifications does Kushner have to manage such assets? What has his "fund" invested in?

None sequitur to the lack of qualifications related to Hunter, however Jared is a third generation family in the real estate business that goes back almost 70 years and billions invested.

which has nothing to do with managing a hedge fund

He's more qualified than someone who sat on the board of Amtrak and an Ukrainian oil company, but don't you concern yourself with that little detail.

Hunter Biden is, or was, a licensed corporate law attorney, versed in Delaware law, where millions of companies, including some of the ones where he served on boards.

Fully qualified, actually.

So its totally above board for Burisma to pay $10 million in legal fees to purchase an American energy company for $20 million? Okay...

Was his compensation the same as the other board members? Yes? Then what is the problem?

The $10 million is over and above Hunters board fee. Quit moving the goalpost like everyone on the left

That was alleged by a disinformation campaign. It isn’t a fact.

Just like the disinformation campaign of 'peaceful and patriotic' on j6 that is pending indictment?

J6 was not peaceful and patriotic.
The alleged extra $10 million is not verified, nor is there any forensic proof of it, so yes both fake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

How do you explain the contents appearing on one laptop supposedly recovered by Rudy Guliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGionova in 2019 and another at a computer shop in Delaware in 2020, bot supposedly belonging to Hunter Biden, while at the same time, messages randomly appear with a Russian mobile carrier tag on it? Hardly the kind of chain of possession prosecutors rely on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

How do you explain the contents appearing on one laptop supposedly recovered by Rudy Guliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGionova in 2019 and another at a computer shop in Delaware in 2020, bot supposedly belonging to Hunter Biden, while at the same time, messages randomly appear with a Russian mobile carrier tag on it? Hardly the kind of chain of possession prosecutors rely on.

Keep up. The original hard drive was taken into custody by the FBI in Nov., 2019. Copies of the hard drive were circulated to others.
People MAY have added contents to the copies.... but I have yet to see anyone claim that the images and documents circulated are not authentic.

[Anonymous]

The judge should absolutely NOT accept the plea deal.

A special prosecutor needs to be appointed and this whole scandal needs to be thoroughly investigated.

Garland needs to get out of the way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The judge should absolutely NOT accept the plea deal.

A special prosecutor needs to be appointed and this whole scandal needs to be thoroughly investigated.

Garland needs to get out of the way.

Garland isn't in the way. This has been Weiss's call from the get go.

You are just upset that the facts don't support the allegations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

How do you explain the contents appearing on one laptop supposedly recovered by Rudy Guliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGionova in 2019 and another at a computer shop in Delaware in 2020, bot supposedly belonging to Hunter Biden, while at the same time, messages randomly appear with a Russian mobile carrier tag on it? Hardly the kind of chain of possession prosecutors rely on.

Keep up. The original hard drive was taken into custody by the FBI in Nov., 2019. Copies of the hard drive were circulated to others.
People MAY have added contents to the copies.... but I have yet to see anyone claim that the images and documents circulated are not authentic.

Then you need different news sources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The judge should absolutely NOT accept the plea deal.

A special prosecutor needs to be appointed and this whole scandal needs to be thoroughly investigated.

Garland needs to get out of the way.

Garland isn't in the way. This has been Weiss's call from the get go.

You are just upset that the facts don't support the allegations.

He should have appointed a special council from the get go.
When the son of the sitting president to whom he reports is being investigated, it SCREAMS special council.
But, he didn't. Because he knew special councils have authority that an attorney in Delaware doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

How do you explain the contents appearing on one laptop supposedly recovered by Rudy Guliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGionova in 2019 and another at a computer shop in Delaware in 2020, bot supposedly belonging to Hunter Biden, while at the same time, messages randomly appear with a Russian mobile carrier tag on it? Hardly the kind of chain of possession prosecutors rely on.

Keep up. The original hard drive was taken into custody by the FBI in Nov., 2019. Copies of the hard drive were circulated to others.
People MAY have added contents to the copies.... but I have yet to see anyone claim that the images and documents circulated are not authentic.

Then you need different news sources.

Post a document, image, or anything from the laptop that has proven to be fake.