Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“White ethnics”? Keep on sorting people into those identity boxes, Democrats. Never change.
They mean people who are caucasian but speak a language other than english. It's most definitely a different identity box, not just a political construct. They largely socialize in ethic groups where they speak their home language and don't really assimilate. You just haven't noticed them because they don't talk to you and they look white.


This isn't at all what "they" mean. It's just another way for liberals to put people in boxes based on identity characteristics. The obsession is real.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“White ethnics”? Keep on sorting people into those identity boxes, Democrats. Never change.
They mean people who are caucasian but speak a language other than english. It's most definitely a different identity box, not just a political construct. They largely socialize in ethic groups where they speak their home language and don't really assimilate. You just haven't noticed them because they don't talk to you and they look white.


This isn't at all what "they" mean. It's just another way for liberals to put people in boxes based on identity characteristics. The obsession is real.
You may not believe in them, but they believe you live a sad culture-free life, devoid of history and estranged from family. And yes they skew conservative, but not your brand of conservative.
Anonymous
The mayflower group is generational satanism. Can’t stand the light.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can we stop “othering” people? It’s not a good look no matter who’s doing it.


OP isn’t “othering” people. OP is just racist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“White ethnics”? Keep on sorting people into those identity boxes, Democrats. Never change.
They mean people who are caucasian but speak a language other than english. It's most definitely a different identity box, not just a political construct. They largely socialize in ethic groups where they speak their home language and don't really assimilate. You just haven't noticed them because they don't talk to you and they look white.


This isn't at all what "they" mean. It's just another way for liberals to put people in boxes based on identity characteristics. The obsession is real.
You may not believe in them, but they believe you live a sad culture-free life, devoid of history and estranged from family. And yes they skew conservative, but not your brand of conservative.


What on earth did I just read...
Anonymous
Most white Americans are mutts and after generations of mixing have a little bit of anything.

The terms wasp and “ethnic whites” mean nothing to people, and any discussion of these irrelevant groups is completely misunderstanding what happened during the election.
Anonymous
On Friday, billionaire Elon Musk, who has been very close to Trump since bankrolling his election, agreed with MAGA influencer Ian Miles Cheong, who has more than a million followers on X, when Cheong posted: “Much of the anger being driven toward Elon Musk today is simply disappointment being projected by the ‘ret*rded right’ that’s on the fringes of the conservative movement, against Musk, whom they wish was an unrepentant racist like they are.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Within the white population has anyone else noticed that white-ethnics (Italians, polish, Eastern Euro, Irish) seem to be have a higher incidence of maga than mayflower whites/dar eligible types.

Thoughts? Isn’t this the exact opposite of 20-30 years ago?



Very, very, very, very few Mayflower/DAR eligible types are MAGA. They don't have to be.

MAGA is (mostly) for angry, lower middle class white men (not that there's anything wrong with any of those categorizations) who are convinced someone's "taking" something from them.


And that's exactly what the GOP has tapped into and promoted - that the "other" is responsible for their miserable lives.


Which is justified.


Factory jobs are gone due to mechanisation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Most white Americans are mutts and after generations of mixing have a little bit of anything.

The terms wasp and “ethnic whites” mean nothing to people, and any discussion of these irrelevant groups is completely misunderstanding what happened during the election.
This thread is revealing how many posters on dcum don't actually live in urban areas
Anonymous
Italians are used to their government being brutal while they prescribe a life of dolce vita. They are more rigid in thinking having the church at the head of their government and used to deception to make things work out best for them.

Anglican are used to a balance between church and state and like to promote thus either by way of their international heritage or their belief in the constitution.
Anonymous
https://x.com/othmanonx/status/1885158336955638243?s=46

One thing I’ve noticed and Richard Hanania was one of the first to point out is the most “maga” and reactionary of the “foot soldiers”

The groyper types….

Are what Ben Franklin would say….”very swarthy”

The thesis of this thread was so accurate

Anonymous
I’m doing some political work in a north east city on municipal issues and this phenomenon is reflected not only in maga vs non-maga at the federal level but also intraparty in municipal issues

- Italian Irish, eastern euros are more anti congestion pricing than DAR Americans.

- the ethnic whites are more anti bike lane and road diets

- the ethnic whites are more nimby

- the ethnic whites are more “anti-abundance”

I must say when I mean ethnic whites, I specifically mean gentile ethnics. Jewish Americans are much more evidence-based.

The political coalitions on the material conditions of a city are very interesting - ethnic whites + old black people…a powerful force that loves to look backwards, is scared for the future.



Anonymous
You know MAGA'S scared when they try to resurrect as many divisive threads as they can


You know one color we all like?


Green! We like our money to not be stolen by BS politicians like Trump and Musk.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote: I’m doing some political work in a north east city on municipal issues and this phenomenon is reflected not only in maga vs non-maga at the federal level but also intraparty in municipal issues

- Italian Irish, eastern euros are more anti congestion pricing than DAR Americans.

- the ethnic whites are more anti bike lane and road diets

- the ethnic whites are more nimby

- the ethnic whites are more “anti-abundance”

I must say when I mean ethnic whites, I specifically mean gentile ethnics. Jewish Americans are much more evidence-based.

The political coalitions on the material conditions of a city are very interesting - ethnic whites + old black people…a powerful force that loves to look backwards, is scared for the future.





Feeling lost as a displaced Scandinavian American, longing for her birthright claim of public transit and free healthcare.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Democrats decided they no longer cared about blue collar union workers. Those workers are voting republican now


That first sentence is blatantly false. And the Republicans never have never will and currently are not doing anything for blue collar workers.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: