Will your DC wear mask to school when Youngkin lifts school mask mandate next week?

[Anonymous]

No the mask protects the other people. Remember “your mask protects me, my mask protects you”?

It’s clear that the anti maskers just don’t care about others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No the mask protects the other people. Remember “your mask protects me, my mask protects you”?

It’s clear that the anti maskers just don’t care about others.

Yep I just can’t believe youngkin is forcing people to not to wear mask. This is ridiculous. Did he run on this?

[Anonymous]

I can only pray that all the crazy anti maskers have had Covid recently. Contrary to popular belief; most people I know have not had Covid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can only pray that all the crazy anti maskers have had Covid recently. Contrary to popular belief; most people I know have not had Covid.

Pro mask here but enormous eye roll to the self righteousness of this statement. I guess congratulations to you for not knowing many people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can only pray that all the crazy anti maskers have had Covid recently. Contrary to popular belief; most people I know have not had Covid.

Pro mask here but enormous eye roll to the self righteousness of this statement. I guess congratulations to you for not knowing many people.

Sorry it’s true and I know plenty of people. I’m not buying the “everyone will get it.”

[Anonymous]

All I can say is, they better not start cancelling events due to “spread” if they are going to allow kids to unmask.

If we are going to roll the dice and let it rip, then we need to not punish the kids who had no choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All I can say is, they better not start cancelling events due to “spread” if they are going to allow kids to unmask.

If we are going to roll the dice and let it rip, then we need to not punish the kids who had no choice.

If schools systems cannot require students to wear masks, suspending all non-essential school activities, such as athletics and extra-curriculars, makes sense. I was complete opposed to APS’s suspension of those activities after winter break, but going forward it may be the only choice thanks to Governor Trumpkin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No the mask protects the other people. Remember “your mask protects me, my mask protects you”?

It’s clear that the anti maskers just don’t care about others.

Yep I just can’t believe youngkin is forcing people to not to wear mask. This is ridiculous. Did he run on this?

He ran on bringing excellence back to education - more charter schools and a no-CRT (although I don't think anyone can point to where a school district has been systemically teaching CRT) curriculum. On the campaign he was against vaccine mandates. As for masks in schools, he said he would let localities decide. He didn't start talking about opt-outs until last week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My poor teacher daughter texted me today and asked me if a teacher had dumped Youngin in the past, and this was his way of getting back at teachers. It’s not the mask vs no mask. It’s the demonization of teachers. Youngkin is just shifting the responsibility. And it sucks. Schools will close because of staff shortages. And Youngkin will blame “lazy teachers”.

He knows he was elected solely because people are unhappy about "education."

To the PP who suggested sending students to the principal's office if they refuse to wear masks, do you really think that will work? My DCs are in HS. If most high schoolers decide not to wear masks, what is the recourse?

They could put them in segregated classrooms for virtual learning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can only pray that all the crazy anti maskers have had Covid recently. Contrary to popular belief; most people I know have not had Covid.

Pro mask here but enormous eye roll to the self righteousness of this statement. I guess congratulations to you for not knowing many people.

Sorry it’s true and I know plenty of people. I’m not buying the “everyone will get it.”

I assure you as someone much more in the middle on nearly all pandemic issues and who thinks that most people here on both sides of the issues are nuts and don’t speak for me or most people I know, I’ll tell you that continuing to suggest that people who get COVID are the “others” who aren’t doing everything right like you and your friends is a bad idea. It increases animosity and makes people less willing to test and disclose, which is something I know you support. It’s amazing we’re still having to say this two years into this thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My poor teacher daughter texted me today and asked me if a teacher had dumped Youngin in the past, and this was his way of getting back at teachers. It’s not the mask vs no mask. It’s the demonization of teachers. Youngkin is just shifting the responsibility. And it sucks. Schools will close because of staff shortages. And Youngkin will blame “lazy teachers”.

He knows he was elected solely because people are unhappy about "education."

To the PP who suggested sending students to the principal's office if they refuse to wear masks, do you really think that will work? My DCs are in HS. If most high schoolers decide not to wear masks, what is the recourse?

They could put them in segregated classrooms for virtual learning.

The order doesn’t limit placing extra restrictions on unmasked kids. You want to forego masks? Fine. But be ready for consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My poor teacher daughter texted me today and asked me if a teacher had dumped Youngin in the past, and this was his way of getting back at teachers. It’s not the mask vs no mask. It’s the demonization of teachers. Youngkin is just shifting the responsibility. And it sucks. Schools will close because of staff shortages. And Youngkin will blame “lazy teachers”.

He knows he was elected solely because people are unhappy about "education."

To the PP who suggested sending students to the principal's office if they refuse to wear masks, do you really think that will work? My DCs are in HS. If most high schoolers decide not to wear masks, what is the recourse?

They could put them in segregated classrooms for virtual learning.

The order doesn’t limit placing extra restrictions on unmasked kids. You want to forego masks? Fine. But be ready for consequences.

They should be informed of the consequences associated with not wearing a mask and yes, segregating unmasked students away from masked students is legal way to protect students who have medical conditions that make them at risk of severe illness. If you have an underlying medical condition, you cannot change that. Not wearing a mask is not a condition that can't be changed unless you have medical documentation that you can't wear a mask.

[Anonymous]

Youngkin can be recalled with 10% of the vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My poor teacher daughter texted me today and asked me if a teacher had dumped Youngin in the past, and this was his way of getting back at teachers. It’s not the mask vs no mask. It’s the demonization of teachers. Youngkin is just shifting the responsibility. And it sucks. Schools will close because of staff shortages. And Youngkin will blame “lazy teachers”.

He knows he was elected solely because people are unhappy about "education."

To the PP who suggested sending students to the principal's office if they refuse to wear masks, do you really think that will work? My DCs are in HS. If most high schoolers decide not to wear masks, what is the recourse?

They could put them in segregated classrooms for virtual learning.

The order doesn’t limit placing extra restrictions on unmasked kids. You want to forego masks? Fine. But be ready for consequences.

They should be informed of the consequences associated with not wearing a mask and yes, segregating unmasked students away from masked students is legal way to protect students who have medical conditions that make them at risk of severe illness. If you have an underlying medical condition, you cannot change that. Not wearing a mask is not a condition that can't be changed unless you have medical documentation that you can't wear a mask.

This. I think informing is fine, but there are so many consequences of not masking that I have a hard time feeling any sympathy if anyone starts whining "oh but I didn't know there would be a consequence IN SCHOOL for not masking." What has been the consequence so far?

I really think this will all be a non-issue though. APS is still requiring masks and republicans understand that local governing entities have the final say in local issues. Isn't that what they've been arguing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin can be recalled with 10% of the vote.

You know he’s made a lot of us really happy, though. We are educated and your friends and neighbors. Silently listening to your rants.