Wow, gotta hand it to the Catholics to find a way to bend the rules to allow the money to continue to flow. “Civil divorce” sanctioned by the Church. Incredible. |
|
It is completely legal. As long as you do not have a custody order in place you can do whatever you want. Be sure to tell him
In writing where you will be as others suggested. Also, be sure to come back. |
The first time I went through security solo with DS, when he was 3, they asked a few extra questions and DS was being cute and wouldn’t answer who I was. Security wouldn’t let us through until DH, who was parking the car and meeting us at the gate, came through and presented his ID. DS never did say that I was Mom or that Dad was Dad but both parents with ID ended the stall. I never was concerned, I knew DH was coming and that DS was indeed my child, but there was a bit of a delay and Managers called over. We started carrying DS passport after that because toddlers can be unpredictable. My Dh was travelling solo with DS and the TSA guy asked DS his name, who he was traveling with and was Mom coming? DS answered everything this time, his name, Dad, and Mom was going to see her Dad in state X while DS and DH went to visit Grandma. No issues. But there were some extra questions. My Cousin had similar questions asked when traveling internationally with his kid solo. I had a friend asked questions by Customs traveling through Canada who requested proof that the Spouse was informed, they had a letter because they had been warned it could happen. The letter had Moms number on it so Security could call. I don’t know if it is a good thing or a bad thing that you have not had similar experiences but there have been enough personal and anecdotal experiences in our life that we cover our bases to make travel go smoothly if it is a solo parent with the kid. |
There is and has always been a difference between civil marriage/divorce by the State and the Catholic Sacrament of Marriage. Catholics need one for the State and one for the Church. The church actually doesn't care what the State does vis a vis marriage and divorce. People don't seem to understand this distinction. |
Not abduction! They aren't even a separated couple. She can go to Mars with her own kids whenever she wants. He doesn't have to agree. But ..he can also do that. This conversation should be about how to safely separate and get the kids out of harm's way, not a vacation really. |
Too bad! Go anyway. He has zero say in the matter. |
To be safe. I would make all the arrangements to go with just the kids. Then I would find (cheapest worst ) a ticket for him to go. Buy it not tell him about. So that it does come up in the divorce you can say you bought him a ticket and he refused to come. Don’t tell him unless it comes up at divorce time. Since he’s mental anyway he probably won’t tell the difference. |
|
If he is delusional, could this be dangerous?
Would he think the kids are at risk? Would he call the police? Unless you are really exagerrating his state, you need advice from a mental health professional (ideally one who knows your spouse's situation). If he is incapable of making competent decisions, perhaps you need to seek sole guardianship? Just "taking" them, sounds off. |
Well, they sure did care about civil marriage when we were debating gay marriage, so it’s no wonder there was confusion. |
This is not at all necessary. This is not parental abduction; there is nothing to worry about there. So long as there is no custody agreement stating otherwise, either parent can take the kids on vacation. |
So she says. I would not believe a word she says and her DH should consult a lawyer and see whatv he can do to stop her. |
I can see why you might think I would lie to my husband, although I am not, but what would be the purpose of lying here? |