I agree with this in general. They value work over all else and if both people in a couple don't work people seriously judge. I will say, however, that my relatives of French descent have a more balanced view of life. They have vacation homes where they summer. They're wealthy rednecks though and do a lot of going on cruises and AIs in Mexico. They winter in Arizona. Their vacation and second home choices are not the ones I would make. But their lives seem nice regardless. To each his own! |
| I think DCUM overestimates how much time Americans can get off and can afford certain types of vacations. We are not poor by any means (make a little over 200k) but cannot afford many of the places mentioned here. |
Depends. Lots of people "summer" every year in a seasonal or a cottage in NH on a brackish lake or a trailer on Fenwick Island... just saying. |
| It's pretty universal on DCUM that people who return to FL year after year are the opposite of classy. |
|
Completely idiotic because it confuses money with social class and ignores multicultural and international people like me. I return to the Alps regularly in summer because I'm French and like my mountains. I avoid the touristy parts because I don't like crowds when hiking. |
Also - the part about Christmas markets makes me laugh. Most of the stuff is sadly cheap knock-offs; the few surviving local workshops who make everything by hand end up not being able to compete, and they're hard to identify in a market setting. It's best to visit them in their workshops. Christmas markets have been terrorist targets for quite a while in France and Germany. If you go, go for the ambience, sure. But if you've done one, you've done them all. |
In part it's because of personality variation. Liberals and the upper class tend to be "high-openness" personalities. Such personalities like learning for its own sake, like to embrace diversity and see unexpected things. At least half of the working class (especially the white working class in America) tend to be lower openness personalities who like the expected and like to follow and not lead. The former like to travel to cities or new countries. The latter like to go to theme parks and Disney. On average. |
| I agree. My Dad is a 5%'er and he has global access and a pass that allows you to just board and pay for first class upgrades. He literally walks to an airport be it private or commercial, and boards. He has been to 43 countries in 4 years As I speak, he is heading to Quito, and then to the Galapagos Islands to explore and take a private cruise on a yacht. I am his daughter and cannot do such things. I know he is of a different class. |
| For instance: Families homes in Nantucket, Mill Reef and Jackson Hole for the regular vacations. Napa, Williamette and Beaune for wine trips. Europe for educational trips. Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing for the future, Ngorongoro, Etosha or Kruger to see animals. Lather, rinse, repeat through the generations. |
Do you mean that he doesn't need to bother with reservations because there's always room in first class? I suppose he must sill arrange in advance for visas for certain countries. |
I had some rich European friends in college. They said they would come to nyc to shop during the holidays. And Asians fly to nyc to shop all year round. I have also read about these European Christmas markets and it is laughable. I wonder if it is the same poster. |
I get that Sea Colony is not considered as nice as Sea Island (I wouldn't know, I grew up doing beach vacations in Cape May and now we primarily go to the Cape because DH's parents have a house there). But are we really going to say you can still be "middle class" if you own a second home in a vacation destination? |
Caneel Bay
|
DP here. Maybe not “middle class” but you can certainly own a vacation home without being “rich.” Especially if you rent it out part of the time, but even if you don’t. Not all vacation homes are fancy. And some people own a second home in lieu of other vacations. |
5%er? That sounds more like 1% |