Princeton stripping Woodrow Wilson’s name from the public policy school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democrat Party doesn't have a hint of racism in it. They are all Republicans now. Why? Because I say so, damn it. Don't say otherwise or you will hurt my feelings. And, you are a racist, so there.

Brilliant

In a party full of idiots, the moron looks brilliant.

[Anonymous]

Third grade retorts are their finest. Gotta love DCUM!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wilson intensified segregation throughout the federal government, the military, and DC. I hope that our understanding of US history will be more comprehensive as we move forward.

Wilson was a dem. Go figure.

[Anonymous]

George Washington had slaves. George Washington I should be renamed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:George Washington had slaves. George Washington I should be renamed

When will they start trying to take down his monument?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I despise Trump and think he’s one of the worst presidents ever, but if he signs an executive order putting an end to this stupid renaming and tearing down shit, I’d be for it.

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

Why is it stupid? Does it give you comfort because it keeps your white history in your comfort zone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:George Washington had slaves. George Washington I should be renamed

gwu is a ttt so no one cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wilson intensified segregation throughout the federal government, the military, and DC. I hope that our understanding of US history will be more comprehensive as we move forward.

Wilson was a dem. Go figure.

Only Republicans are defending him. Go figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:George Washington had slaves. George Washington I should be renamed

When will they start trying to take down his monument?

It could happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:George Washington had slaves. George Washington I should be renamed

When will they start trying to take down his monument?

It could happen.

It will happen. Though easier to remove the names of the Founding Fathers from everything than to tear down the Street Washington Monument!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wilson intensified segregation throughout the federal government, the military, and DC. I hope that our understanding of US history will be more comprehensive as we move forward.

Wilson was a dem. Go figure.

Only Republicans are defending him. Go figure.

Republicans are not defending him. They are laughing at you idiots. You don't realize this. Go figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wilson intensified segregation throughout the federal government, the military, and DC. I hope that our understanding of US history will be more comprehensive as we move forward.

Wilson was a dem. Go figure.

Only Republicans are defending him. Go figure.

Republicans are not defending him. They are laughing at you idiots. You don't realize this. Go figure.

oh, that's right, Republicans only chain themselves to statues of traitors.

BTW, from your dear leader: "Can anyone believe that Princeton just dropped the name of Woodrow Wilson from their highly respected policy center . . . Incredible stupidity"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wilson intensified segregation throughout the federal government, the military, and DC. I hope that our understanding of US history will be more comprehensive as we move forward.

Wilson was a dem. Go figure.

Only Republicans are defending him. Go figure.

Republicans are not defending him. They are laughing at you idiots. You don't realize this. Go figure.

oh, that's right, Republicans only chain themselves to statues of traitors.

BTW, from your dear leader: "Can anyone believe that Princeton just dropped the name of Woodrow Wilson from their highly respected policy center . . . Incredible stupidity"

Hey doofus, there is a difference between defending Wilson and defending "history." If you do not understand this, it is probably because you went to a lame school like Princeton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wilson intensified segregation throughout the federal government, the military, and DC. I hope that our understanding of US history will be more comprehensive as we move forward.

Wilson was a dem. Go figure.

Only Republicans are defending him. Go figure.

Republicans are not defending him. They are laughing at you idiots. You don't realize this. Go figure.

oh, that's right, Republicans only chain themselves to statues of traitors.

BTW, from your dear leader: "Can anyone believe that Princeton just dropped the name of Woodrow Wilson from their highly respected policy center . . . Incredible stupidity"

Hey doofus, there is a difference between defending Wilson and defending "history." If you do not understand this, it is probably because you went to a lame school like Princeton.

Statues aren’t history - or should we have left all those statues of Saddam
Hussein up in Iraq because otherwise they would have forgotten who he was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Democrats are finely getting their due.

Oh wait, all the Confederate generals were Democrats too.

Democrats then ≠ Democrats now.

Look up “Southern Strategy” and get back to us.

+1.