Please support your viewpoint with data. |
6/10 is not nearly all, it's barely more than half, but I thought we needed to meet all of them, not nearly all. |
| Safe enough to gather for mass protests, should be safe enough to open businesses. Oh but I forgot this is all politics. |
DC, PG, MoCo and NoVA were all behind the rest of Md in opening. That makes sense. |
It isn't safe enough to gather for mass protests. But people are doing it anyway, because the mass protests are even more important. |
I wouldn't be surprised to learn that you've never set foot in Montgomery County. |
MoCo was recently warned about its credit rating, and the amount of money MoCo has to spend on servicing its debt keeps going up. But continue to stick your head in the clouds and keep electing insane liberals like Elrich who'll continue to increase taxes, drive businesses under, and gut the county. MoCo has had anemic economic growth for almost a decade now and has lost out on all sorts of big employers moving in because it is so bad doing business in MoCo. Stop with the excuses. MoCo is in steep decline. |
First of all, we went into Phase 1 without meeting even 6. But let’s take a look at the others: - Cases are at 8 of 14 days, but positivity rate is going down, so we know the new cases are due to increased testing, not because the virus is spreading more quickly - number of new deaths is at 12/14. Nearly there and, also, we are averaging a low number of deaths (7 per day). - Acute care bed utilization is at 2/14 but the 3-day average is at 71%, which nearly at the benchmark of under 70%. The last one isn’t a declining metric; it’s testing capacity. Right now it’s at 3.2% of the population, above the CDC’s benchmark of 2%. Gayles wants it at 5%, but hasn’t said why. |
|
I'll add to the previous poster that the acute bed utilization metric is rather strange. The state health commission expects a 71% average utilization rate during normal times, so why are they looking to get below 70%? And it is somewhat controllable. You can slightly decrease utilization rates by pushing back elective procedures. Or, at least, pushing back procedures let's hospitals free us some more beds for overflow space.
It seems sensible to look at the utilization rate, but the 70% target doesn't make much sense to me. |
| MoCo wasn’t moving forward even before the pandemic... |
PP here. Agreed; I should’ve added that for context around that number. |
The men lost his life in a brutal senseless way, there are millions in pain. Could you please respect this. Yes, COVID is important but so are other issues that we have to address accordingly and respectfully. Have some empathy to those who suffer for ages. |
But but but
|
|
Do you want businesses open now or schools open in the fall? Which one is more aligned with the long term social and economic health of our community? You can't have both.
Opening businesses now will lead to higher community transmission in the fall, meaning schools will not be able to open or will rapidly close. Or, we could take advantage of the weather effect and drive community transmission down far enough that we can actually do testing and contact tracing to contain the inevitable increases in the fall. |
Eh I don’t know about that. None of the states that have reopened businesses have seen cases and deaths increase. Some have had cases increase, but not deaths, and they’ve been open long enough that you’d see a death increase by this point. |