Because limiting yourself to a single caregiver is social-distancing, and far preferable to having to put your child in a group care situation. We are not under quarantine, we are limiting social interactions. Having childcare can still be consistent with limiting social interactions. |
Not around here. I'm 44. My oldest is 20 and in college, I had him when I was 24. If you read DCUM regularly you'll see that I am basically the same as a teenage mom in the eyes of most psters here. At 44, my oldest child should be about 2 or 3 years old to be "acceptable." So in DCUM land, most college parents are in their late 50's at the youngest. |
Please watch your language and calm down. You really need to relax. Why don't you do everyone and yourself a favor and stay off these boards for a while. It's obviously getting you super spun up. I don't know if you think it's somehow helping to argue with people on here, but it's not. It's divisive and not what we need at a time like this. |
This sounds very reasonable to me. |
What you and so many here are not understanding is this: Even if you limit contact with this "one other healthy family" whom you "trust to follow the rules," that may not matter at all, and you cannot know. Your healthy family or their healthy family might have been exposed already and not yet showing symptoms. People can transmit the virus while they are not symptomatic. There is another thread on DCUM about having playdates while schools are shut. Of course many posters said to go for it. Then one noted that her family was limiting contact and playdates to one other trusted family. And now someone in that other family turns out to have been exposed earlier so, quarantine, I guess. The poster noted that just assuming everyone is fine and limiting yourself to seeing/interacting with one other household does not necessarily work. By the way, re: other posts above: I do get that some people must go to work outside the home. But the posters coming here to cry, "would you deny child care to physicians and nurses?!" so indignantly KNOW that is not what anyone here is saying. We are not talking about those kinds of truly urgently needed jobs. We're talking about DCUM parents who come here to say things should be done "incrementally" and they can't work at home with their kids running around. Unless their jobs are vital health and safety work -- which they would not be doing at home anyway -- they can deal. A poster somewhere said she and her husband will take shifts, she's getting up extremely early to work until the kids are up,, she works when they go to bed, etc. It can be done and IS being done by the non-whining people. And YES, before someone leaps in to say, "But what about single parents trying to work at home? They should get outside help to come in" etc. -- This. Is. Not. Forever. |
| This brings two groups of incubators together: young kids and college age young adults (most have a looser interpretation of isolating). Then they can bring it home to their older parents. It’s a tough situation but I don’t know if this is the solution |
|
| Everyone should be “spun up”. We want to get past thing as soon as possible and not have it dragged out and more deadly because some spoiled mothers who are home can’t entertain their own kids! |
Yes. A huge one. I do not want my children exposed anymore than necessary. They are not home for a vacation but because of a serious health emergency. Take vacation time and take care of your children who are your responsibility!!!!!!!!!! |
They can use their vacation and dick leave. |
Lol. |
| The poor will do what they need to for financial reasons. No college student wants to take care of your kids unless they are living with you. |
|
No. You can refuse. |
This is their job and they knew this when they chose their vocation whereas a lawyer is not a first responder and no reason why non-emergrncy people can stay home. |