E. Jean Carroll, columnist who says Donald Trump raped her, fired from Elle

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

He’s guilty. She’s not a nutcase. You’re a misogynist.

She's a nutcase. She proved that with her appearance on Anderson Cooper.
Hell - even Elle saw what a wacko she is.

So because she’s eccentric she deserved to be raped by Trump?

And I watched that interview. Your definition of “nutcase” has some porous boundaries if she seemed like a nutcase but you keep supporting Donald.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

He’s guilty. She’s not a nutcase. You’re a misogynist.

She's a nutcase. She proved that with her appearance on Anderson Cooper.
Hell - even Elle saw what a wacko she is.

Liar -- Elle did not say she was a wacko. And she is certainly less of a nutcase than Donald Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

It makes you wonder how many hits they would get if they ran Trump’s DNA through a rape database.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

It makes you wonder how many hits they would get if they ran Trump’s DNA through a rape database.

That’s my thinking. I think he might have some concerns if his DNA is entered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

Imagine someone who says they’re all about “law and order” ducking a valid subpoena issued by a judge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

^^^^

This. If he didn't rape her and there is zero chance she has his semen on her dress, then prove it. Enlisting the US Department of Justice to defend it seems, I don't know, desperate?

[Anonymous]

It’s the same story as his taxes. If Trump is innocent why not get his name cleared?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

It makes you wonder how many hits they would get if they ran Trump’s DNA through a rape database.

That’s my thinking. I think he might have some concerns if his DNA is entered.

If it's entered on ancestry, I think he would have some concerns. Wonder how many kids he has out there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t blame Elle? Well, they’re the ones that fired you...

This.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

When Trump denied her claim he said he had never met her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

I’m wondering why you didn’t answer the PP’s question?
-NP