Trump replaced Maguire with Grenell after raging over House briefing on 2020 election threats

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Imagine if the DNI warned the House Intelligence Committee that terrorists might try to bomb the U.S. — and the President got mad, fired him, and then appointed someone who would deny this was a threat...and GOP went along with it.

That is what is happening right now.

Yep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Trump fired the DNI and is bringing in Grenell to shut down the election interference working group that Dan Coats established - is that what's going on here?

Yes it is

[Anonymous]

All roads lead to Putin...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Trump fired the DNI and is bringing in Grenell to shut down the election interference working group that Dan Coats established - is that what's going on here?

Pretty much. And worse.

[Anonymous]

The Russia is helping Trump again articles tells me that the excuses for his re-election have started

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Trump fired the DNI and is bringing in Grenell to shut down the election interference working group that Dan Coats established - is that what's going on here?

Pretty much. And worse.

The “worse” is that Trump doesn’t think that Congress should get any information from the IC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Trump fired the DNI and is bringing in Grenell to shut down the election interference working group that Dan Coats established - is that what's going on here?

Pretty much. And worse.

You all are so FOS.

President Trump didn't fire him in response to the briefing, He is literally REQUIRED BY LAW to step down.

From The New York Times:

"....under current law limiting the duration of postings for acting cabinet-level officials, Mr. Maguire must step down next month."

And, you do know that Ric Grenell has been pretty tough on Russia in his role as ambassador?

[Anonymous]

In addition to this, look at his public schedule of intel briefings. Since Sept 1 he has had only 68 of them. That’s out of 148 days where he should have had one (as the PDB runs 6 days a week). In December he only had 4 intel briefings.

National security information is simply not getting to this President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Trump fired the DNI and is bringing in Grenell to shut down the election interference working group that Dan Coats established - is that what's going on here?

Pretty much. And worse.

You all are so FOS.

President Trump didn't fire him in response to the briefing, He is literally REQUIRED BY LAW to step down.

From The New York Times:

"....under current law limiting the duration of postings for acting cabinet-level officials, Mr. Maguire must step down next month."

And, you do know that Ric Grenell has been pretty tough on Russia in his role as ambassador?

And guess what, genius, Grenell has the same expiration date as DNI since Trump hasn't nominated anyone else to permanently take the position.

It's clear now that Trump wants Grenell - who's part of the Giuliani-Toensing-Firtash scheme - to squash the investigations into Russian interference and hide relevant intelligence from Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Trump fired the DNI and is bringing in Grenell to shut down the election interference working group that Dan Coats established - is that what's going on here?

Pretty much. And worse.

You all are so FOS.

President Trump didn't fire him in response to the briefing, He is literally REQUIRED BY LAW to step down.

From The New York Times:

"....under current law limiting the duration of postings for acting cabinet-level officials, Mr. Maguire must step down next month."

And, you do know that Ric Grenell has been pretty tough on Russia in his role as ambassador?

It was expected that Trump would nominate Maguire to be the official DNI, and that he would be confirmed by Congress. But he decided, right after the intelligence briefing, to replace Maguire with Grenell. It's technically not firing him. But that's what he did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Russia is helping Trump again articles tells me that the excuses for his re-election have started

Well, then he should disclaim it, and tell McConnell to pass the legislation to combat it and fund cyber security measures in our elections to ensure he is legitimately voted into office. But firing 4 people because they briefed the House Intel Committee about Russia's measures doesn't exactly reflect the actions of someone who wants to ensure the legitimacy of this reign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In addition to this, look at his public schedule of intel briefings. Since Sept 1 he has had only 68 of them. That’s out of 148 days where he should have had one (as the PDB runs 6 days a week). In December he only had 4 intel briefings.

National security information is simply not getting to this President.

That is probably a good thing, when the President is clearly a Russian asset.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In addition to this, look at his public schedule of intel briefings. Since Sept 1 he has had only 68 of them. That’s out of 148 days where he should have had one (as the PDB runs 6 days a week). In December he only had 4 intel briefings.

National security information is simply not getting to this President.

That is probably a good thing, when the President is clearly a Russian asset.

When you combine it with all the career professionals having been ousted from the NSC and State, it means the IC has no one listening. No one.

[Anonymous]

There is a whole traunch of senior leadership at ODNI that are leaving. Like DOJ, this should be a major/siesmic message to the public that something is amiss.

[Anonymous]

So —- when are we taking to the streets?