| I’d save your energy for getting involved in choosing her replacement. |
Both are irresponsible. |
| Wonder if Joey Jones will throw his hat in the ring? |
+1. Serino was principal when Westland had a complaint filed against it for not complying with IEP/504 obligations. Westland was required to hold community meetings about it and although Serino, at that point, was publicly saying she would enforce, I was less than impressed by what seemed excuses about how she couldn't control teachers. BCC, and thus Dr. Jones, has also been terrible about special ed obligations. |
I don't think MCPS had a choice. You can't have a principal selection without including the staff and community in the decision -- I don't think principals are simply announced unilaterally by central MCPS. So, IMO, if they wanted Dr. Jones ASAP in the central office, there was no choice but to appoint a temporary for 1 year. Appointing a permanent principal so quickly and without any community consultation would have encouraged the pitchforks to come out! |
| They did what they had to do. I'm sure they're unhappy about it too. Could be a messy selection process. Some heated emotions around a couple of the possible candidates. |
|
"if they wanted Dr Jones in the central office, there was no choice . . ."
"they did what they had to do. I'm sure they're unhappy about it too" Ummm. I can map out the alternative. Very simple. You don't replace principals in the middle of the school year, or one week into the school year, or one week before the school starts. You replace the principal in June immediately post-graduation. So that the new principal can use the summer to get up to speed. There is literally no central office job that's so important that you need to pull principal out of the school mid-year. It's simple. |
| I blame the system for this. No one individual is responsible |
She applied for the job when the position became available. |
|
Dr. Jones is terrific! She was a new principal at a challenging time where the school has been a major urban construction site while in operation and as a result, had to deal with complicated logistics, parent concerns, student morale, teacher morale. At back to school night, she was very upbeat and positive about the change, but a few of us could see subtle sadness that may have indicated that it was not her choice. So unfair that they did not keep her there for at least another year, now that the major construction project is about to wrap up. She did a good job through a complex period of BCC’s operations. Wish her the best of luck!!!
Does anyone know if any parents meddled in this? There is at least one parent who has been successful in meddling with the boundary, sports fields, sports coach, and other admin decisions in the cluster. I wonder if this was due to the actions of those folks. |
| She wanted the job! No one strong armed her into it. |
Oh, please! i went to BTS and saw no "subtle sadness". In fact, I almost bust out laughing when she closed by saying she would always be a Baron in her heart. She has been at BCC for 4 or 5 years. She is not crying about leaving. She is getting a promotion and probably getting paid more. Who can blame her? I never really liked her or thought she was a good principal but she wasn't terrible either. More power to her if she is working her way up the ladder! (Also, construction has not been that logistically taxing -- school had a few trailers but most of the school was open during construction without much displacement. Only hardship seemed to be having to arrange the athletic schedule and associated supports. ) Put your tiny fiddle away for Dr. J. |
| Anyone want to speculate on who will be tapped to apply for the principal position? |
|
Sorry, PP but you are just wrong about this. Some folks wanted her out of the way and this is how they are doing it. |