Fr. James Martin, SJ

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He certain does NOT call gays to chastity and so I think he signals gay sex is ok with god.


That is so, so, so stupid and hurtful, and also a straight-up lie. Martin's work is all about how the Church needs to build bridges and connections to LGBT people. The Church isn't just for perfect people--all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Gay people know perfectly well that the Catholic Church thinks that they are sinful and disordered. But God calls us all, in our sinfulness and our brokenness. Everyone sitting in the pews on Sunday is a sinner, and everyone is welcome, and should be welcomed.

Here is him writing about how parishes can and should welcome LGBT Catholics and their families: https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/08/23/father-james-martin-how-parishes-can-welcome-lgbt-catholics

Here's what he writes specifically about the issue of chastity: "Don’t reduce gays and lesbians to the call to chastity we all share as Christians. L.G.B.T. people are more than their sexual lives. But sometimes that’s all they hear about. Remember not to focus solely on sexuality but on the many other joys and sorrows in their lives. They lead rich lives. Many L.G.B.T. Catholics are parents themselves or are caring for aging parents; many help the poor in their community; many are involved in civic and charitable organizations. They’re often deeply involved in the life of the parish. See them in their totality. And if you talk about chastity with L.G.B.T. people, do it as much with straight people."

Other points: "God loves them—so should we. And I don’t mean a stingy, grudging, judgmental, conditional, half-hearted love. I mean real love. And what does real love mean? The same thing it means for everyone: knowing them in the complexity of their lives, celebrating with them when life is sweet, suffering with them when life is bitter, as a friend would. But I say even more: Love them as Jesus loved people on the margins: extravagantly."

"By not welcoming and by excluding L.G.B.T. Catholics, the church is falling short of its call to be God’s family. By excluding L.G.B.T. people, you are breaking up God’s family; you are tearing apart the Body of Christ."

"Because Jesus’ approach was, more often than not, community first, conversion second. For John the Baptist the model was to convert first and then be welcomed into the community. For Jesus, it’s community first, conversion second. Welcome and respect come first. This is how Jesus treats people who feel on the margins. He seeks them out before anyone else; he encounters them, and he treats them with respect, sensitivity and compassion. So when it comes to L.G.B.T. people and their families in our parishes, it seems that there are two places to stand. You can stand with the crowd, who grumble and who oppose mercy for those on the margins. Or you can stand with Zacchaeus, and, more important, with Jesus."

If you want to read Martin's writings--which I recommend, since he is a very good, thoughtful writer, you could start here: https://www.americamagazine.org/voices/james-martin-sj?page=0
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does it seem like Fr Martin is signaling gay sex so not sinful? I always feel like that is the subtext in flashing lights.


What are you talking about?


Some people think that if your message to LGBT Catholics doesn't begin and end with how sinful gay sex is and how they need to be celibate, you are doing it wrong. For a lot of people, sexual morality is central to their creed, which is kind of odd, given how little time Jesus spent talking about sex (compared to how much time he spent talking about showing mercy, love, and compassion to all, especially the poor, the oppressed, the prisoner, and the outcast). So if you're doing LGBT "outreach," your job is apparently to remind them, as if they didn't already know, that the Church says that if they have sex, it's a sin. Which is certainly not how people think that the Church ought to do outreach to divorced people, for example, or unmarried people--let alone those who commit non-sexual sins.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He certain does NOT call gays to chastity and so I think he signals gay sex is ok with god.


That is so, so, so stupid and hurtful, and also a straight-up lie. Martin's work is all about how the Church needs to build bridges and connections to LGBT people. The Church isn't just for perfect people--all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Gay people know perfectly well that the Catholic Church thinks that they are sinful and disordered. But God calls us all, in our sinfulness and our brokenness. Everyone sitting in the pews on Sunday is a sinner, and everyone is welcome, and should be welcomed.

Here is him writing about how parishes can and should welcome LGBT Catholics and their families: https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/08/23/father-james-martin-how-parishes-can-welcome-lgbt-catholics

Here's what he writes specifically about the issue of chastity: "Don’t reduce gays and lesbians to the call to chastity we all share as Christians. L.G.B.T. people are more than their sexual lives. But sometimes that’s all they hear about. Remember not to focus solely on sexuality but on the many other joys and sorrows in their lives. They lead rich lives. Many L.G.B.T. Catholics are parents themselves or are caring for aging parents; many help the poor in their community; many are involved in civic and charitable organizations. They’re often deeply involved in the life of the parish. See them in their totality. And if you talk about chastity with L.G.B.T. people, do it as much with straight people."

Other points: "God loves them—so should we. And I don’t mean a stingy, grudging, judgmental, conditional, half-hearted love. I mean real love. And what does real love mean? The same thing it means for everyone: knowing them in the complexity of their lives, celebrating with them when life is sweet, suffering with them when life is bitter, as a friend would. But I say even more: Love them as Jesus loved people on the margins: extravagantly."

"By not welcoming and by excluding L.G.B.T. Catholics, the church is falling short of its call to be God’s family. By excluding L.G.B.T. people, you are breaking up God’s family; you are tearing apart the Body of Christ."

"Because Jesus’ approach was, more often than not, community first, conversion second. For John the Baptist the model was to convert first and then be welcomed into the community. For Jesus, it’s community first, conversion second. Welcome and respect come first. This is how Jesus treats people who feel on the margins. He seeks them out before anyone else; he encounters them, and he treats them with respect, sensitivity and compassion. So when it comes to L.G.B.T. people and their families in our parishes, it seems that there are two places to stand. You can stand with the crowd, who grumble and who oppose mercy for those on the margins. Or you can stand with Zacchaeus, and, more important, with Jesus."

If you want to read Martin's writings--which I recommend, since he is a very good, thoughtful writer, you could start here: https://www.americamagazine.org/voices/james-martin-sj?page=0

+1000
Anonymous
I'm curious why OP is asking?
Anonymous
He has a recent tweet admiring the marriage of Pete Buttigieg.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He has a recent tweet admiring the marriage of Pete Buttigieg.


Yes -- he flirts with tacit approval of homosexual congress.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious why OP is asking?


I think Fr. Marin sounds like a nice protestant priest. I don't understand why he is Catholic when he wants to bend Catholic teaching.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He like most people has some things right and some things wrong.

His work to build a bridge the lgbt community is very good but he plays it very safe.

He wrote this book.... https://www.amazon.com/Building-Bridge-Relationship-Compassion-Sensitivity/dp/0062694316

He is Jesuit ... so is Prep... he strongly supported Kavanaugh. He blocked anybody that had anything intelligent to say about their negative interactions with boys that attended various Jesuit all boy schools. He blocks trolls ... that make sense but anybody that had a negative comment.???

He lost a lot of followers and lots of credibility.

He also is the editor of the American magazine.

Follow him on twitter or Facebook and decide for yourself.


He supported Kavanaugh until Dr. Blasey testified, at which time America Magazine (he is the editor at large) and the Jesuits withdrew their support.

https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2018/09/27/editors-it-time-kavanaugh-nomination-be-withdrawn

https://relevantmagazine.com/culture/fr-james-martin-even-the-disciples-dismissed-the-testimonies-of-credible-women/



Yes for the nomination.

But the idea that the Jesuits need to do something about the morals at the all boys Jesuit schools ... not so much.

I’m not in the position to find the article but right after dr. Fords testimony there was an article about there is nothing wrong with the all boys Jesuit school.. never have been.

Renata would disagree.


I haven’t read his stuff and I’m personally not a fan of single sex education. But I will say that I went to a lot of guys in college who went to Jesuit schools and they aren’t all the same. The guys from Regis high school in New York were all really nice. I know Regis gives a ton of scholarships to working class New Yorkers and also doesn’t seem to have the sports culture of a place like GP. I think the privilege of the kids attending, and the emphasis placed on things like sports, affects the culture of the school a lot.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He has a recent tweet admiring the marriage of Pete Buttigieg.


Yes -- he flirts with tacit approval of homosexual congress.


If he thinks the union is sinful, why approve?

Go and sin no more!
Anonymous
Do we think priests should public praise couples living out of wedlock?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He certain does NOT call gays to chastity and so I think he signals gay sex is ok with god.


Citation please.

Have you read his book?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not aware of him, but as the parent of a practicing Catholic who happens to be a lesbian, I’m supportive of a true effort to make LGBTQ Catholics feel welcome. We really liked the initiative run by the HRC.

Can you tell me more about him and his work?


NP - I've seen him on TV a few times and figured he was gay -- just a guess, though


Why do you figure that?


His affect raised my gaydar. Just a guess, though.


Yes.

I wonder what we would all guess about you?


It’s not a put down to say somebody is gay... btw.


No, but it is obnoxious to speculate about another person's sexuality.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He like most people has some things right and some things wrong.

His work to build a bridge the lgbt community is very good but he plays it very safe.

He wrote this book.... https://www.amazon.com/Building-Bridge-Relationship-Compassion-Sensitivity/dp/0062694316

He is Jesuit ... so is Prep... he strongly supported Kavanaugh. He blocked anybody that had anything intelligent to say about their negative interactions with boys that attended various Jesuit all boy schools. He blocks trolls ... that make sense but anybody that had a negative comment.???

He lost a lot of followers and lots of credibility.

He also is the editor of the American magazine.

Follow him on twitter or Facebook and decide for yourself.


He supported Kavanaugh until Dr. Blasey testified, at which time America Magazine (he is the editor at large) and the Jesuits withdrew their support.

https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2018/09/27/editors-it-time-kavanaugh-nomination-be-withdrawn

https://relevantmagazine.com/culture/fr-james-martin-even-the-disciples-dismissed-the-testimonies-of-credible-women/



Yes for the nomination.

But the idea that the Jesuits need to do something about the morals at the all boys Jesuit schools ... not so much.

I’m not in the position to find the article but right after dr. Fords testimony there was an article about there is nothing wrong with the all boys Jesuit school.. never have been.

Renata would disagree.


Now you are moving the goalposts. You wrote above that he "strongly supported Kavanaugh." He did not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does it seem like Fr Martin is signaling gay sex so not sinful? I always feel like that is the subtext in flashing lights.


What are you talking about?


Some people think that if your message to LGBT Catholics doesn't begin and end with how sinful gay sex is and how they need to be celibate, you are doing it wrong. For a lot of people, sexual morality is central to their creed, which is kind of odd, given how little time Jesus spent talking about sex (compared to how much time he spent talking about showing mercy, love, and compassion to all, especially the poor, the oppressed, the prisoner, and the outcast). So if you're doing LGBT "outreach," your job is apparently to remind them, as if they didn't already know, that the Church says that if they have sex, it's a sin. Which is certainly not how people think that the Church ought to do outreach to divorced people, for example, or unmarried people--let alone those who commit non-sexual sins.


He doesn't "signal gay sex so not sinful." See above.

Have you read his book?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not aware of him, but as the parent of a practicing Catholic who happens to be a lesbian, I’m supportive of a true effort to make LGBTQ Catholics feel welcome. We really liked the initiative run by the HRC.

Can you tell me more about him and his work?


NP - I've seen him on TV a few times and figured he was gay -- just a guess, though


Why do you figure that?


His affect raised my gaydar. Just a guess, though.


Yes.

I wonder what we would all guess about you?


It’s not a put down to say somebody is gay... btw.


No, but it is obnoxious to speculate about another person's sexuality.


In your opinion.

Single people do it all the time -- wondering if an attractive person would be attractive to them.
post reply Forum Index » Religion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: