13:24 is a sock puppeting post. Learn something about markets before you post. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/12/kudlow-says-us-will-pay-for-china-tariffs-contradicting-trump.html White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow on Sunday acknowledged that the Chinese do not directly pay tariffs on goods coming into the U.S., contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. Kudlow said that “both sides will suffer on this,” but argued that China will suffer significant GDP losses as export markets are hit. The blow to U.S. GDP, on the other hand, won’t be substantial since the economy is “in terrific shape,” he said. |
Tell us how different and/or better it is than the first NAFTA. We'll wait. |
Down, down, down goes the DOW. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/13/us-markets-react-to-china-trade-war-news-and-more.html
|
The only people who win in a trade war are the trade attorneys. They’ve been raking it in since Trump took office, and this is pretty much just handing them more bags of cash. |
Both sides are lying. As someone who engages in international trade and receives multiple invoices a week with tariff amounts paid, I know first hand how my little corner of the world is handling the tariffs: the Chinese suppliers are absorbing some, the US resellers are absorbing some, and end customers are seeing minimal price changes. So at least from my perspective, China is paying for *some* of the tariffs by way of lowered supply costs. As to the macro effect of the tariffs, the analysis broadly agree: China is the one that stands to be hurt far more by them than the US. This is why whenever Trump has put in new tariffs, the US stocks have only dipped slightly and then recovered, while Chinese stocks dip and remain low. But no, the actions of seasoned analysts and investors who put their money where their mouth is are ignored. Instead we just have talking head son TV saying how the US is paying for all the tariffs. It is indeed frighteningly stupid. |
What in the world are you talking about?!?!?! |
No “sock puppet”. Sorry. You just don’t like hearing from someone who has actually lived in China under its oppressive control. I’m grateful that the former Chinese poster is here. You should be to. |
You should take an economics class and learn something about the "stickiness of prices". You may not see prices change immediately as traders absorb the hit in the short-term. But eventually prices go up, so that sellers can keep their margins robust. |
??? You can google for the differences yourself. The PP claimed that nothing happened. The fact that something happened shows that he is either ignorant, or was lying. |
That was on 10% seemingly short term tariffs. It's now 25% and seemingly long term. |
My above “sock puppet” post is addressed to whoever accused me of being a sock puppet. Liberals apparently don’t want to hear from someone who has actual experience with the Communist Chinese government. You Liberals should really put down your hatred, and seek the truth. |
You do know that it hasn't actually been ratified yet, right? (And no, you don't get to claim that it's substantially different without backing up your claim) |
![]() |
Not ratified is very different from "nothing happened". I am not the original person making the claim that nothing happened. The person making that claim has the burden of proof that nothing was changed between the old and new NAFTA agreements, not for me to prove that something was changed. Again, the PP claimed that nothing happened, either he was ignorant of the facts, or was lying. It's up to the PP to provide proof that "nothing happened". |
The stock market is not liking the Trump tarriffs. |