Reply to China Retaliates Against the U.S. With Its Own Higher Tariffs

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "China Retaliates Against the U.S. With Its Own Higher Tariffs"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's ironic for China to call for mutual trust and respect when they are guilty of intellectual property thefts, forced technology transfers, and anti-competitive behaviors that block foreign goods/services from being competitive in the Chinese market. Tell me, can you hail an Uber in China?

Mutual trust and respect my @ss. What they want is for the US to go back being complacent like we were under Obama, to stay quiet while being bent over a barrel by China. [/quote]

Well, okay.  But you're only right if this works.  If it stops China from stealing our IP, undercutting us globally, etc.  [/quote]

It has brought them to the table, hasn't it? Why any American would be against Trump making this effort to fight back against China is a mystery.  If you can read Chinese, their discussion forums are a mixture of defiance and worry that the US has finally come to its senses and will substantially reduce the amount of free-loading that China has been able to get away with in the past. [/quote]

Everyone plays Trump and the conman plays Americans for stupid, this is his REALITY TV. Coming to the table is just a time wasting tactic that everyone is deploying. NK came to the table and nothing happened. [b]Canada and MX came to the table and NOTHING HAPPENED[/b]. China came to the table and nothing happened. But the conman has passed a tax cuts for the rich. YAY![/quote]

Really? We don't have a new NAFTA 2.0? [/quote]

Tell us how different and/or better it is than the first NAFTA.

We'll wait.[/quote]

??? You can google for the differences yourself. The PP claimed that nothing happened. The fact that something happened shows that he is either ignorant, or was lying. [/quote]

You do know that it hasn't actually been ratified yet, right?

(And no, you don't get to claim that it's substantially different without backing up your claim)[/quote]

Not ratified is very different from "nothing happened". I am not the original person making the claim that nothing happened. The person making that claim has the burden of proof that nothing was changed between the old and new NAFTA agreements, not for me to prove that something was changed. Again, the PP claimed that nothing happened, either he was ignorant of the facts, or was lying. It's up to the PP to provide proof that "nothing happened". [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics