Yes. They break down all the time. So I just think people who drive them are a bit foolish with their time and money. |
| Yes |
Yup. This. |
| Eww factor. |
| 10 years and older not so tack; kind of fun. But glad I don’t pay maintenance on one. |
| Range Rover is trash compared to Tesla, volvo, BMW, Mercedes etc. |
| Assholes drive them. |
| I had a Land Rover for 8yrs. It did not “break down all the time”. They are reliable |
|
would question Tesla more.The company is running out of money. Musk over promises and under delivers and is way behind schedule on the mire affordable models. The engines catch on fire, have short ranges and often use fossil fuel to recharge. Build quality also very flimsy and cheap, though the design is nice.
Range Rover can be over the top but cars are still built in UK, not India, and come with a five year warranty. Drivers of either car can emit a tragic sense of keeping up with the jones. |
| New money. Linebacker or trust fund baby. |
| Yeah, I definitely think insecure douche. |
|
Analyst recommendation on Tesla stock:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-06/sell-tesla-wall-street-pulls-out-the-rarest-of-ratings-for-musk Tesla model 3 build quality http://autoweek.com/article/green-cars/tesla-model-3-walkaround-teardown-engineering-firm-highlights-assembly-issues The best known RR models are still made in UK despite Tata's ownership https://www.landrover.com/experiences/manufacturing-tours/index.html |
|
Range Rovers are probably going the way of Louis Vuitton monogram bags in that more ostentatious shows of wealth are seeming to finally become out of fashion.
If you want a badass family car, get the E63 AMG Mercedes Station wagon, it's as fast as a Ferrari. |
| Tacky? No. Ostentatious and showy? Yes. |
|
No, they're just wasteful, eco-unfriendly and not that safe. Not tacky. More: "why would anyone buy that?" |