Comparison of Kate and Meghan’s wedding dresses

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan’s dress was disappointing. Bland and boring.

+ 1

Plus, in some photos, the top/sleeves looked too big. Very disappointing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They sy that Kate's is not being copied in the wedding fashion world. We will see with Meghan's.

Didn't read OP's article, I see. Oh well.

[Anonymous]

Both brothers got beautiful brides and are married to women they love. They deserve all happiness after losing their mom. Diana would have been so happy to see both her sons happily married to strong, beautiful women.

The world is filled with sadness with all kinds of horrible news. I for once am happy that there is some joyful news and some beautiful people on screen. I am sick and tired of seeing Dotard and his pursed little girl mouth.

[Anonymous]

I liked both the dresses. However, I expected that Meghan's dress would have been shell pink, or cream, or something.

[Anonymous]

I liked Kate's dress, an update on Grace Kelly. Meghan's is okay - I get that she wanted minimalist but it was lost under that huge veil! Is it typical that the veil is larger than the dress?

[Anonymous]

This is Meghan's second wedding. Not surprised she went for something simple yet elegant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan's dress was gorgeous, far better than Kate's very unoriginal, over-embellished update on Grace Kelly and the Queen. That said, the gospel sermon was embarrassing. I had to leave the room. Harry did not look happy.

You mean the Episcopal bishop?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Kate's was perfect for a first wedding and that Meghan's dress right for a more mature, second wedding.

Diana's dress was gorgeous at the time and absolutely perfect on her but looking at it now, it is really quite dated.

I think both Kate's and Meghan's dresses are more classic looks that will stand up to the test of time.

Agree completely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan's dress was gorgeous, far better than Kate's very unoriginal, over-embellished update on Grace Kelly and the Queen. That said, the gospel sermon was embarrassing. I had to leave the room. Harry did not look happy.

You mean the Episcopal bishop?

I loved him. He added the joy of God, and not just respect for God, to the ceremony. He certainly had a bit of Baptist gospel preacher about him, which reminded me of the influence Billy Graham had on Queen Elizabeth. Not the gospel preacher aspect, but of the low church disintermediated relationship with God and Jesus. And I say this as a Catholic, where intermediation reigns!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They sy that Kate's is not being copied in the wedding fashion world. We will see with Meghan's.

Kate's dress IS still being extensively copied. H&M is making a $299 version.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan's dress was gorgeous, far better than Kate's very unoriginal, over-embellished update on Grace Kelly and the Queen. That said, the gospel sermon was embarrassing. I had to leave the room. Harry did not look happy.

You mean the Episcopal bishop?

I loved him. He added the joy of God, and not just respect for God, to the ceremony. He certainly had a bit of Baptist gospel preacher about him, which reminded me of the influence Billy Graham had on Queen Elizabeth. Not the gospel preacher aspect, but of the low church disintermediated relationship with God and Jesus. And I say this as a Catholic, where intermediation reigns!

I fast-forwarded through all of the religious crap. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I prefer Kate's, but Meghan was obviously going for simple to get away from the American celebrity reputation.

Harry was nervous, because he's not used to being in the spotlight.

I think they're sweet together.

+1, the dress was a counterweight to all the other ways she and the ceremony departed from tradition. I was curious whether it was one of those dresses and makeup jobs that photographs differently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan's dress was gorgeous, far better than Kate's very unoriginal, over-embellished update on Grace Kelly and the Queen. That said, the gospel sermon was embarrassing. I had to leave the room. Harry did not look happy.

You mean the Episcopal bishop?

I loved him. He added the joy of God, and not just respect for God, to the ceremony. He certainly had a bit of Baptist gospel preacher about him, which reminded me of the influence Billy Graham had on Queen Elizabeth. Not the gospel preacher aspect, but of the low church disintermediated relationship with God and Jesus. And I say this as a Catholic, where intermediation reigns!

2nd all of this!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I didn't like either one. I thought Diana's dress was beautiful.

Do you still think so? It’s 1980s meringue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't like either one. I thought Diana's dress was beautiful.

Do you still think so? It’s 1980s meringue.

NP. I was 8yrs old when Charles and Diana got married and I thought it was the ultimate in princess, fairytale wedding dresses. Most beautiful thing I’d ever seen. Now I find it very dated to the 80s but still amazing for what it was.