Kate's dress will stand the test of time. Unfortunately, Kate's will not. No offense to her. |
| ^Sorry, I meant Meghan's. |
| They sy that Kate's is not being copied in the wedding fashion world. We will see with Meghan's. |
| Meghan's dress will stand the test of time. |
? |
| Look closely at kate’s desss... it’s actually a sweetheart neckline and the lace is fitted over it like a top. It’s unbelievable! A feat of craftsmanship in English lace. |
+1 |
+2 |
| Different body types, so different dresses, but one-on-one I prefer Meghan's. Diana's was of its time, but I recall people praising it then. |
|
I think Meghan could have had fancier hair or makeup.
Kate is just another level of royal. |
| Meghan’s dress was disappointing. Bland and boring. |
| Kate wore very little makeup and a simple hairstyle. What “other” level was she on. I find it so amusing that all of a sudden Kate is being seen as the epitome of “royalty”. She’s been consistently criticized by many (media and public) for everything from her behavior when she was Williams girlfriend to her laziness now and also for being a commoner and not worthy of the throne. Now though, companies to Meghan, she’s supposedly more “royal”, spare me. |
| Companies=compared |
|
I prefer Kate's, but Meghan was obviously going for simple to get away from the American celebrity reputation.
Harry was nervous, because he's not used to being in the spotlight. I think they're sweet together. |
| Kate was a lovely bride but Meghan is special. She lights up the room. |