| We always avoid Mexico too. There are so many other options in the Caribbean that are just as nice if not nicer and much safer. Just not worth it. |
| If you loved the Rosewood Mayakoba, you will be very disappointed by the Occidental Xcaret. Food and rooms were below average for AI’s, IMO. Proximity to Xcaret is not as convenient as it sounds as there is still quite a walk to get there. FWIW, we prefer Xel-Ha to Xcaret. Grand Velas was very very nice, but the concrete on the surrounding pool decks is so slippery that my very cautious 12 yo fell 2x, one time requiring a visit to the hospital. Which is a whole other story in itself... but I would worry constantly about a younger child falling down. |
+1 |
It is not safe and those who work in national security, law enforcement etc all know the risk is high but ignorance leads people to believe because they went and were fine that it isn't more dangerous and that simply isn't true. |
|
I've traveled extensively to places that many Americans would consider "unsafe" - Egypt, Israel, India, etc.
I would not go to Mexico. |
The "there are murders in US cities, too" argument is just so disingenuous. Here's the list of the 50 most violent cities in the world: http://www.businessinsider.com/most-violent-cities-in-the-world-2018-3 A quote from the article: "Of the 50 cities on the list, 42 are in Latin America, including 17 in Brazil, 12 in Mexico, and five in Venezuela. Colombia had three, Honduras had two, and El Salvador, Guatemala, and Jamaica all had one." The highest ranking US cities on the list are Baltimore, at 21, with 55 homicides per 100,000 people and St. Louis at 13 with 65.83. Acapulco is #3 with 107 murders per 100,000 people, and Los Cabos is #1 with 111 murders per 100,000 people. (1) I'm not going to vacation in inner City Baltimore or St. Louis. That said, the murder rate in the most dangerous Mexican cities is double the rate in our most dangerous cities. (2) Both Mexican cities are resort areas (or at least they used to be). Mazatlan is also on the list. I vacationed in Acapulco in the 1980's and it was lovely. Most of the most dangerous cities are border towns or coastal towns. If you think about the nature of the drug trade, that makes sense. There have been recent incidents of violence in Quintana Roo. By all means, go, if you want to. But don't justify it by saying that "nowhere is perfect." There are degrees of "perfection." |
| I lived in Mexico for several years and have visited for work and for enjoy at least 20 times and I've been in most parts if the country. The list of places I would not go to or to which I will not return unless there are big improvements keeps growing and I would now use similar precautions in resort areas that I would have applied only to cities. When things go wrong there it can get bad fast in ways you can't outsmart. |
| There are so many safer places to go and if you’re dead set on tropical, even among the islands. It just gets worse and worse down there. I personally never understood the allure. I love seeing different parts of my own country. I’d seriously rather go to Nebraska than Mexico. |
+1. Mexico isn’t even that cheap compared to a US beach vacation. |
| I just got back from cancun with dh and the kids. It was great! I would not go to Mexico City however. |
Ditto. We canceled a Mexico trip. The thing is - people in law enforcement DO say not to go there. So why risk it |
+1 - I've been to the above plus Lebanon and Jordan and would go again to all of them. I've also been to Turkey a few times but would pause at this point and do some more research before going back. I would not go to Mexico right now. |
|
| Sadly, yes. I know a bunch of people who have gone recently, or are still going. Personally, I just don't think it's a risk worth taking. I love Mexico. The people are amazing, but you can't trust the police and if anything were to happen, that is scary. |
|
I travel to Mexico City; I think its great. I take basic precautions. To each his own. |