Scott Pruitt Spent $10,200 for a one year lease of a car with bullet-resistant seat covers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:$10k/yr? big deal.

But a worker should be grateful for a $1000 one time bonus, table scrap from the fat tax cut?

[Anonymous]

Give Pruitt a break. Trump has air force one, the secrete service, and all 9 yard. Poor Pruitt has to improvise himself to get into the league.

I can't wait for somebody to come up with a butt shot meme.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

In fairness, he went with the bullet-resistant seat covers, not bulletproof with baby seal.

[Anonymous]

Does he have schitzophrenia?

[Anonymous]

LOL at the “fiscal conservative” FRAUDS. The 2014 Tahoe has the previous generation dated front fascia - THAT’S why he wanted a brand new, latest generation one. Same exact SUV, he just wanted the new looking one.

What a total clown show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I get that this guy is a bit of a dolt for all this, but my quesiton is who is drip-drip-dripping this water torture trying to get rid of him? Is it someone in the White House, or some EPA employees that are trying to oust him?

Dolt? He’s obviously a thieving crook. And I’m saying that as a registered republican.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pruitt strikes me as a high-functioning paranoid schizophrenic.

Narcissistic money hungry sociopath with a Napoleon complex. And a blatant crook using office to enrich himself and cronies.

[Anonymous]

Please, someone care enough to take him down! It’s these dramas and bad actors that are ruining our country, our environment, our standing in the world. We’re getting desensitized to this corruption because it’s so rampant. The rotten lobbyists among us have taken over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given the left? I've no issues with that.

Right! After all, MLK was killed by a leftist! Lincoln? Lefty killer got him! Thank you for keeping it real, MAGAt!

JFK was killed by a communist.

R. Reagan: shot by a liberal

G. Ford: multiple assassination attempts by a liberal

G. Wallace: shot by a liberal

R. Kennedy: shot by a liberal

S. Scalise: shot by a liberal

seeing a trend here?

Oh, okay pookie. More like mentally ill, mentally ill, mentally ill, mentally ill, undetermined shooter (also: Communism isn’t liberalism, and it's a bit rich that the party of treason keeps trying to pretend Russia has anything to do with the Democratic Party), and mentally ill. I do see a trend, and that's for Republidytes to ignore reality. Frankly, with that murderous assemblage's mental health history and the NRA's history of wanting more guns for everyone including the mentally ill, I'm surprised you aren’t suggesting they should have had more guns.

Yeah, that guy who shot Scalise was hardly a "liberal." He was from a conservative midwestern town where the "democrats" would be republicans anywhere else. And he lived with a huge cache of weapons. What true liberal lives with a cache of weapons? Conservatives are always trying to tell us that liberals want to take away the 2nd amendment. So by default, anyone who is a gun nut cannot be a liberal.

And what exactly was liberal about the other shooters? Please explain their exact liberal views.

[Anonymous]

He’s already been found to have violated the law with his phone booth expenditures and those extremely high/improper raises to young staff. Why won’t the GOP congress start hearings into this? They certainly would have if Obama’s EPA head had behaved this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s already been found to have violated the law with his phone booth expenditures and those extremely high/improper raises to young staff. Why won’t the GOP congress start hearings into this? They certainly would have if Obama’s EPA head had behaved this way.

Hearings? If this were Obama's guy, they would have had his head on a pike six months ago!

[Anonymous]

One of the things I hate with the media is the need to constantly dig up every single thing and make it a scandal. The other things warranted the outrage, but let's let this one pass. It's completely normal for heads of agencies, in this day and age, to have a lot of security.

If we want to get outraged about ever.single.thing, then it makes it look like we are just out to dig up dirt and it makes us look less credible. Let's leave the outrage to the truly bad things these people are doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the things I hate with the media is the need to constantly dig up every single thing and make it a scandal. The other things warranted the outrage, but let's let this one pass. It's completely normal for heads of agencies, in this day and age, to have a lot of security.

If we want to get outraged about ever.single.thing, then it makes it look like we are just out to dig up dirt and it makes us look less credible. Let's leave the outrage to the truly bad things these people are doing.

BS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the things I hate with the media is the need to constantly dig up every single thing and make it a scandal. The other things warranted the outrage, but let's let this one pass. It's completely normal for heads of agencies, in this day and age, to have a lot of security.

If we want to get outraged about ever.single.thing, then it makes it look like we are just out to dig up dirt and it makes us look less credible. Let's leave the outrage to the truly bad things these people are doing.

BS

If this was completely normal he would have requested it from Congress, since that’s what the law says he has to do if he wants improvements to his office that cost more than $5,000.