Boys shamed for not harassing girls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Me again, was never a push over either. I run my household. I think it was moreso that girls had a hard time seeing through insecure strength versus real strength. Never was whipped, and didn’t do back flips to try to please women. This is what the “bad boys” did in my eyes. Always trying to outshine or undermine rivals.

Women often say they like confidence. But, it's displays of confidence that they seem to be attracted to. At least when they're younger. More mature women have more mature tastes. (Or they have fewer options. It's hard to tell sometimes.)

Considering that my 50yr old neighbor with an average job only dates women under 35 who are thin and fit and has a new one every few months, im thinking fewer options.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think people overstate the "bad boy" appeal. The only time bad boys are appealing are when they are super good looking. (Ask Danny Trejo how many sexy roles he gets...). And let's be real -- if those guys were super good looking and NICE, they'd be even more popular with women. I think it's just that, if you're super good looking, you can sort of afford to be a jerk. So it's not the jerkiness that is attractive in itself, it's the super hotness. Correlation, not causation. (I feel like that's the answer 70% of the time to every question.) IMHO, it's the not very good looking guys who are always bemoaning "nice guys finish last"....I always sort of want to tell them "Being nice isn't your problem....you're just not that hot." But that would be mean, so I don't say it. Trust me, nice guys -- you'd do worse as a jerk.

Following up on the OP post, one of my least favorite expressions is "whipped." Thankfully I don't seem to hear that anymore (or the stupid whip snap sound). That was the bullying term used for guys that were actually respectful to girls and maybe did what the girls wanted them to do -- they were "whipped." Blech and blech. I hope that one is consigned to the dust bin of history.

19:32 that’s the thing, I am super good looking! There were un attractive guys getting way more girls than me. Because I was attractive I’m not saying I never got any attention or comments. But I was still considered nerdy and most of the girls seemed to value certain image/ behavior over looks.

This is still the case. Women don't want push overs. We want an equal domestic partner who is good with the kids amd cleans house, but when it comes to sex we want a masculine, agressive lover. Doesn't matter how hot you are. Sexual attraction is on a basic level.

So you want a unicorn? Jesus, most women are stupid. I’m a woman, and I feel sorry for guys growing up today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Me again, was never a push over either. I run my household. I think it was moreso that girls had a hard time seeing through insecure strength versus real strength. Never was whipped, and didn’t do back flips to try to please women. This is what the “bad boys” did in my eyes. Always trying to outshine or undermine rivals.

Women often say they like confidence. But, it's displays of confidence that they seem to be attracted to. At least when they're younger. More mature women have more mature tastes. (Or they have fewer options. It's hard to tell sometimes.)

Considering that my 50yr old neighbor with an average job only dates women under 35 who are thin and fit and has a new one every few months, im thinking fewer options.

It's a bit of a tragedy that by the time women learn to discern between the good and the bad guys, the good guys don't want them anymore. Or maybe that means they arent so good. I dont know. Sexuality is so cruel.

[Anonymous]

Let's not pretend that it's only other males that socially encourage sexually aggressive behavior or punish docile behavior.

Do you need to be reminded that 53% of white women voted for Trump? Or that Trump crushed "Low Energy" (i.e., not overtly masculine or aggressive) Jeb and "Little" (too boyish and not dominant enough) Marco Rubio in the primaries?