Would you agree to let your spouse stay home

Anonymous
Yes
Anonymous
What kind of job brings a $200k promotion. G-d do companies overpay people.
Anonymous
Without commenting on the use of the word "let," no one married to me would be staying home on purpose/ not earning unless they want a divorce.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What kind of job brings a $200k promotion. G-d do companies overpay people.


A fake job held by a troll...
Anonymous
LOL. We made SAHP work on 50k. The key was not choosing a house that cost more than twice HHI.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Without commenting on the use of the word "let," no one married to me would be staying home on purpose/ not earning unless they want a divorce.


Why?

Do you feel an adult's only contribution to the world is by earning filthy lucre, I mean money?

How small-minded you are, Ebenezer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Without commenting on the use of the word "let," no one married to me would be staying home on purpose/ not earning unless they want a divorce.


Why?

Do you feel an adult's only contribution to the world is by earning filthy lucre, I mean money?

How small-minded you are, Ebenezer.


I feel that I am not going to support an able-bodied adult who chooses not to work. I would love to stay home and pursue my dreams with that time instead, but if I don't work, I have no home in which to do that. My spouse can choose not to work in someone else's house.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A man who cannot "let" his wife have the choice to stay at home or not is worthless. There is no point in being married to you if you cannot offer the most basic thing.

A woman who is discussing whether or not she can "let" her husband stay at home or not has a worthless husband.



Soooooo, women deserve, no, are entitled to not work simply for owning a vagina? JFC.
Anonymous
Ah, fuck to no dude!!! She will get "accustomed" to that which means you will be responsible for supporting her as long as she lives on this earth, even when you leave her for a younger woman.
Anonymous
A Stay At Home Parent is a gift to your children. Not everyone wants to give them that gift.
Anonymous
No. I might agree to a full time volunteer position.

But play tennis and lunch with friends.

No.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A Stay At Home Parent is a gift to your children. Not everyone wants to give them that gift.


Why do you assume everyone has kids? OP didn't say there are kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A man who cannot "let" his wife have the choice to stay at home or not is worthless. There is no point in being married to you if you cannot offer the most basic thing.

A woman who is discussing whether or not she can "let" her husband stay at home or not has a worthless husband.



Soooooo, women deserve, no, are entitled to not work simply for owning a vagina? JFC.


Women work far more than men ever will, especially dealing with men on a regular basis.

If you mean are women entitled to not work outside of the home in marriage if they don't want to - then of course. What is the point of marrying a man who can't provide that option? None.

Get over your yoni envy. It's unbecoming. I will hold you to the standards fellow men have set but it will be to my benefit. Men want to control everything...on control your income or you are a loser.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A Stay At Home Parent is a gift to your children. Not everyone wants to give them that gift.


Why do you assume everyone has kids? OP didn't say there are kids.


If there are no kids then it is a semantic discussion between adults. And by the way, I did not assume they have kids, I just said if there are kids having a parent home caring for them, especially when they are very young, is a gift.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A Stay At Home Parent is a gift to your children. Not everyone wants to give them that gift.


Why do you assume everyone has kids? OP didn't say there are kids.


If there are no kids then it is a semantic discussion between adults. And by the way, I did not assume they have kids, I just said if there are kids having a parent home caring for them, especially when they are very young, is a gift.


I think it is more important that both parents are there. So if the $400k job means you won't see your kids more than an hour or two a day, it's not worth it.

Once the kids are in school .., it's not a gift to the kids to be at home while they are in school.
post reply Forum Index » Money and Finances
Message Quick Reply
Go to: