Parchment is what we call junk data. No chance the 24/76 is accurate. |
|
??? I know several kids who picked U'Chicago over Yale in recent years. It's definitely not 1%. The numbers are based off actual students filling out where they were admitted and where they matriculate. It is one of the most comprehensive databases out there since it's a prominent transcript company. Even NYTimes used it: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/09/04/upshot/college-picks.html?mcubz=0
Everything I've plugged in seems consistent with I'd expect. Harvard Yale 61/39. Harvard Stanford 56/44 (this one is actually validated by Stanford). Harvard Columbia 90/10. Columbia Cornell 81/19. Columbia Brown 66/34. MIT Caltech 75/25 (MIT's yield is much larger). |
| Parchment is full of fake submissions. |
I was wrong. |
Surprised Michigan is that high. |
Admit rate now down to 30 percent; new 10 million dollar atheistic facility; new downtown facility for their engineering and medical schools; perhaps that helps? |
Don't know if it qualifies as a shake up, but Yale has dropped out of the top 3 in a tie for 5th. Duke drops down a notch to #9. |
Gamed the system, or offered a differentiated product that proved to be popular? Maybe it partly went up in the rankings because the graduates did well at what they were doing? I don't know much about northeastern, but I do know your answer was ridiculous. BU was also a fourth rate school once.... bfd. |
|
Surprised Yale dropped down but Princeton moved up. |
|
Anybody else thinks USNWR messes with the weights every year to get a respectable-but-not-too-shocking shakeup that's "newsworthy"?
Having built indices myself, I know that messing with the weights is really easy to do, even as you publish the indicators that go into your index. Who knows, maybe they publish an unchanging set of weights too, although I don't respect this enough to investigate (even though DC's college is at #5 this year). |
|
Um, what? Yale is ranked 3rd from 4th last year, Princeton has been 1 for the last 7 years.
The biggest movers in the top 30 are Harvey Mudd (went up by 9), NYU (went up by 6) and Haverford (went down by 6), but most schools are 0-2 positions of where they were last year. |
There was a good article on Northeastern in the NYT a while back. They brought in a new president I believe in the early 1990s and his only agenda was to game the USNWR......that's where all of the school's resources went. And guess what, it worked! At the time it was very controversial amongst the faculty but in a world where people are obsessed with these idiotic rankings it was a smart strategy. Still probably only the 7th best school in Boston at best. |
Didn't Wake Forest syptay the same. Wake alum, and it's been 35 or above for the last 20 years, since in move from the LAC category. |
Pretty sure Harvard and Stanford have been #1 within the last 7 years. |