| Holy hell 16:28. Get some therapy for your issues. |
| I haven't read the entire thread...maybe someone suggested these already? http://www.everblocksystems.com/ |
+1. Oddly enough, most families aren't living in 2400 sq. ft houses in pretty much any other country in the world.
|
I'm Swedish and never shared a room with siblings. Neither did any of my friends. Not all europeans live in London, Instanbul, or Madrid. |
LOL If someone has to have their kids sharing a room you can just assume off the bat that they don't have space to do what you are suggesting. |
So cool!! (Someone suggested these but didn't have a link or the product name.) |
You have poor reading skills. We don't have 3-4 bedrooms. We have 2 bedrooms and about 1250 sq ft total. Could we 'afford' a larger house? Sure, if we moved out Loudon/PGC, gave up a yearly vacation, stop saving for college, no extra curriculars for the kids, the 3rd car and the dog. We have no 'outsourced' work, we pack lunch and coffee so there's nothing to be saved on that end. For our family, we believe it's best for the kids to share a room. To the person who has such significant issues with this, all I can say is 'therapy'. My mother shared a room with her brother, her mother shared a room with 3 brothers, my paternal grandfather shared a loft with a number of his siblings....where I grew up, this wasn't uncommon. If you really hated it, you could always sleep in the barn..... |
| It's a valid point that this question is basically one only Americans have the luxury to have. Face it, this only becomes an issue as kids reach puberty and begin to struggle with bodily changes, self Identity, hormones, and start to enjoy masturbation (sometimes very frequently). I'd say sharing is fine as long as there is some sort of partition in the room, bathroom time alone is also somewhat equal, and each child has a set amount of alone time to have in the entire room by him or herself with the door closed every once in a while. |
Why do you ask if you don't want to hear what someone has to say? There are many houses that size or smaller, like ours with three bedrooms. Our house is under 1000 square feet and has three bedrooms. Your house is poorly laid out. You don't need a larger house, you need a better designed house. And, you don't need vacations, a 3rd car or a dog. Its best for you kids share but it may not be best for them. At elementary school age, b/g should have their own rooms. If they were the same gender, fine. |
| Separate rooms is a modern thing. You children are likely to be closer. |
| Each member of the family shall have their own bedroom and bathroom. |
Huh? The only question I asked was, "Do you know what was worse than sharing a room?" You have some seriously poor comprehension skills as well as a very narrow mindset. No vacations, no car for the kids to drive (which is who the 3rd car is for) and no dog? Compromise the quality of our lives just to give my DD her own room? You have issues. And, just because my house doesn't have 3 bedrooms doesn't mean it is poorly designed. I can't believe your criteria for poorly/well designed is the number of bedrooms a house has! Just asked my DD if she'd rather have her own room or a car to drive - she chose the car! |
Fixed that for you! |
What are you looking for but to belittle other posters? Why post at all? You clearly have no interest in what someone else says. Keeping a 3rd car is not that expensive. Nor, is finding a way to get an extra bedroom, especially with the size of your house. If the kids are elementary age, they don't need a car to drive. You keep that car for yourself. |
My sister survived driving while drunk. Good idea them to keep doing things that we survived. |