Why is it ok to post old pictures of Melanie with rude, degrading captions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over five friends on various social media outlets have now posted modeling photos of Melania naked or in lingerie/bikini with rude captions such as "this is your First Lady ew wtf gross what a wh*re" etc. Coming from the same people upset over some bs comment made to slimeball Billy Bush. THE HYPOCRISY

Melania can have the last laugh. Imagine that.

Melania may have the last laugh but that naked photo will follow her into the history books forever. Imagine that!

Well, Melania said she's proud of those pix, so I guess she doesn't care. She does care if you cyberbully her though. She doesn't think she should be cyber bullied for baring her naked ass.

The funny thing is when she came out with that cyberbullying platform last week it was the first time I saw her as an actual (potential) first lady. It was an initiative I could support from her. To be honest before this I've never seen a candidate's wife who has literally been out of the public eye as much as she has, who hasn't been a clear part of her husband's campaign, who didn't have a voice. I guess we'll see what she's made of over the next four years. I hope she improves her English though, its pretty painful listening to her now.

It's so clear to me why she has stayed out of the public eye. I feel so sorry for her now, reading all the vicious comments on her, including how painful it is to listen to her accent. I don't envy her one bit having to be judged by the malicious American public. Especially those who preach inclusion and acceptance and "our daughters can do anything they want."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over five friends on various social media outlets have now posted modeling photos of Melania naked or in lingerie/bikini with rude captions such as "this is your First Lady ew wtf gross what a wh*re" etc. Coming from the same people upset over some bs comment made to slimeball Billy Bush. THE HYPOCRISY

Melania can have the last laugh. Imagine that.

Melania may have the last laugh but that naked photo will follow her into the history books forever. Imagine that!

Well, Melania said she's proud of those pix, so I guess she doesn't care. She does care if you cyberbully her though. She doesn't think she should be cyber bullied for baring her naked ass.

The funny thing is when she came out with that cyberbullying platform last week it was the first time I saw her as an actual (potential) first lady. It was an initiative I could support from her. To be honest before this I've never seen a candidate's wife who has literally been out of the public eye as much as she has, who hasn't been a clear part of her husband's campaign, who didn't have a voice. I guess we'll see what she's made of over the next four years. I hope she improves her English though, its pretty painful listening to her now.

It's so clear to me why she has stayed out of the public eye. I feel so sorry for her now, reading all the vicious comments on her, including how painful it is to listen to her accent. I don't envy her one bit having to be judged by the malicious American public. Especially those who preach inclusion and acceptance and "our daughters can do anything they want."

Have you been asleep the last 8 years?

I don't feel sorry for Melania. She will be the quietest First Lady we've had in a long time. Fine by me -- what honest words can she say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over five friends on various social media outlets have now posted modeling photos of Melania naked or in lingerie/bikini with rude captions such as "this is your First Lady ew wtf gross what a wh*re" etc. Coming from the same people upset over some bs comment made to slimeball Billy Bush. THE HYPOCRISY

Melania can have the last laugh. Imagine that.

Melania may have the last laugh but that naked photo will follow her into the history books forever. Imagine that!

Well, Melania said she's proud of those pix, so I guess she doesn't care. She does care if you cyberbully her though. She doesn't think she should be cyber bullied for baring her naked ass.

The funny thing is when she came out with that cyberbullying platform last week it was the first time I saw her as an actual (potential) first lady. It was an initiative I could support from her. To be honest before this I've never seen a candidate's wife who has literally been out of the public eye as much as she has, who hasn't been a clear part of her husband's campaign, who didn't have a voice. I guess we'll see what she's made of over the next four years. I hope she improves her English though, its pretty painful listening to her now.

It's so clear to me why she has stayed out of the public eye. I feel so sorry for her now, reading all the vicious comments on her, including how painful it is to listen to her accent. I don't envy her one bit having to be judged by the malicious American public. Especially those who preach inclusion and acceptance and "our daughters can do anything they want."

Normally, when parents tell their girls they can be whatever they want, they are not referring to being a model and posing nude. They are usually referring to being the POTUS, an astronaut, things like that. Not posing naked or marrying for money, usually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

My sister lives in Manhattan and these bolded words she shared with me. Half jokingly I told her if only he had gotten therapy for this shunning which now breeds insecurity. Manhattan this is on you, all on you. If you had treated poor Donnie better, we would not be living this reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

My sister lives in Manhattan and these bolded words she shared with me. Half jokingly I told her if only he had gotten therapy for this shunning which now breeds insecurity. Manhattan this is on you, all on you. If you had treated poor Donnie better, we would not be living this reality.

So your sister and the "upper class" believe they are way too good to do anything as gasp! displaying their nudity in a european magazine? I guess they really talk shit about women who are beautiful and grew up in a culture where nudity is ok and if you are getting paid for it it's not considered classless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

My sister lives in Manhattan and these bolded words she shared with me. Half jokingly I told her if only he had gotten therapy for this shunning which now breeds insecurity. Manhattan this is on you, all on you. If you had treated poor Donnie better, we would not be living this reality.

So your sister and the "upper class" believe they are way too good to do anything as gasp! displaying their nudity in a european magazine? I guess they really talk shit about women who are beautiful and grew up in a culture where nudity is ok and if you are getting paid for it it's not considered classless.

What?? None of anything you said makes sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

My sister lives in Manhattan and these bolded words she shared with me. Half jokingly I told her if only he had gotten therapy for this shunning which now breeds insecurity. Manhattan this is on you, all on you. If you had treated poor Donnie better, we would not be living this reality.

So your sister and the "upper class" believe they are way too good to do anything as gasp! displaying their nudity in a european magazine? I guess they really talk shit about women who are beautiful and grew up in a culture where nudity is ok and if you are getting paid for it it's not considered classless.

Who cares what they do in Europe? In this country, it's low class.

[Anonymous]

Melania = FLILTF

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Melania = FLILTF

You mean FLILF (no extra T, see MILF.)

But yes. This one might stick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

My sister lives in Manhattan and these bolded words she shared with me. Half jokingly I told her if only he had gotten therapy for this shunning which now breeds insecurity. Manhattan this is on you, all on you. If you had treated poor Donnie better, we would not be living this reality.

So your sister and the "upper class" believe they are way too good to do anything as gasp! displaying their nudity in a european magazine? I guess they really talk shit about women who are beautiful and grew up in a culture where nudity is ok and if you are getting paid for it it's not considered classless.

What?? None of anything you said makes sense.

It makes sense but you are too dumb to understand it and call anyone who opposes your view nonsensical

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

My sister lives in Manhattan and these bolded words she shared with me. Half jokingly I told her if only he had gotten therapy for this shunning which now breeds insecurity. Manhattan this is on you, all on you. If you had treated poor Donnie better, we would not be living this reality.

So your sister and the "upper class" believe they are way too good to do anything as gasp! displaying their nudity in a european magazine? I guess they really talk shit about women who are beautiful and grew up in a culture where nudity is ok and if you are getting paid for it it's not considered classless.

Who cares what they do in Europe? In this country, it's low class.

Oh really? I thought libs like you always call anyone who doesn't accept others culture a redneck, racist, or low class so that would be you too? Last I checked America is made up of many cultures.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

My sister lives in Manhattan and these bolded words she shared with me. Half jokingly I told her if only he had gotten therapy for this shunning which now breeds insecurity. Manhattan this is on you, all on you. If you had treated poor Donnie better, we would not be living this reality.

So your sister and the "upper class" believe they are way too good to do anything as gasp! displaying their nudity in a european magazine? I guess they really talk shit about women who are beautiful and grew up in a culture where nudity is ok and if you are getting paid for it it's not considered classless.

Who cares what they do in Europe? In this country, it's low class.

Oh really? I thought libs like you always call anyone who doesn't accept others culture a redneck, racist, or low class so that would be you too? Last I checked America is made up of many cultures.

Being a gold-digger nude model is not classy. I'm not liberal, so I guess that's why you're confused.

[Anonymous]

All bets are off now. Trump's orange portrait will hang in the White House along with George Washington's.

Kanye/Kim 2020!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP back again. Well clearly I'm asking on the wrong forum. Liberals are nothing but big fat hypocrites. How dare Trump say "grab them by the pussy" over ten years ago, but totally acceptable for you to degrade a woman over her looks

It's not about her looks. It's about how she chose to display them, her 'assets', and her entire body. I don't think supermodels/models are in any way a bad professional. I just never thought I'd have a nude model as a First Lady. Kind of really takes the kick out of the word 'lady'. But whatever.

+1 If you want to bare your body for money, that's your right. But, it's not really classy, despite what she and her husband think. Classy people don't do this. They are low class. It's one of the reasons the upper class in NYC don't like them, and he hates them for it. I'd prefer someone with a college degree and some class as FL.

My sister lives in Manhattan and these bolded words she shared with me. Half jokingly I told her if only he had gotten therapy for this shunning which now breeds insecurity. Manhattan this is on you, all on you. If you had treated poor Donnie better, we would not be living this reality.

So your sister and the "upper class" believe they are way too good to do anything as gasp! displaying their nudity in a european magazine? I guess they really talk shit about women who are beautiful and grew up in a culture where nudity is ok and if you are getting paid for it it's not considered classless.

Who cares what they do in Europe? In this country, it's low class.

Oh really? I thought libs like you always call anyone who doesn't accept others culture a redneck, racist, or low class so that would be you too? Last I checked America is made up of many cultures.

Being a gold-digger nude model is not classy. I'm not liberal, so I guess that's why you're confused.

Seriously, it's the other way isn't it. Conservatives, especially the religious ones, should be the ones frowning about her as FL.