For those who would really like to know Hillary beyond the caricature
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
People are allowed to vote for whomever they want. Stop behaving like a bully. |
Anonymous
What a big surprise! |
Anonymous
Or risking an even more dangerous foreign policy than Clinton's? |
Anonymous
People are allowed to post whatever they want, so stop acting like a wimp. |
Anonymous
And yet that is the effect a third party vote will have, no matter how much you like to think your meaningless little protest will occur in a vacuum. I don't know if you're a man or white or how well off you are, but the fact is that if Trump wins, people who did not vote for Hillary are going to have a lot worse than the Bush years ever could have been on their conscience. That's not "bullying," sensitive sally, that's a fact. What kind of climate work would we have done under Gore vs Bush? How much less gerrymandering might have occurred? I actually doubt 9/11 would have unfolded as it did, not to mention the bizarro reaction of attacking two unrelated nations. But you do you, I guess. Go Stein. |
Anonymous
You were quoting me. Are you the same PP I quoted? If you are what in my response sounded like bullying? I just want to think through the choices before you are vote. We the educated mass must evaluate and chose a leader out of the viable options and must not blame the result of the next presidency on the uneducated. |
Anonymous
This argument will not work for many of us who will not vote for Hillary and will not vote for Trump either. There was ample evidence that many liberals found Hillary unacceptable as a candidate and yet she was foisted on us by her supporters. Yes, that is how democracy works: she got more votes and won the nomination. Now some liberals and independents may choose not to vote for her or to vote for one of the third party candidates - which is also how a democracy works. The electability of a candidate is an important factor when deciding who to vote for and that should have been given more emphasis when we were selecting a nominee. |
Anonymous
LOL sure...you sound like all those conservatives talking about Obama. You auctually have to get people to vote for your canidate. I am beginning to think Trump has a good chance because Hillary and company have not made a case to vote for Hillary. You know the under 35 vote is almost split even between Hillary, the 3rd party and Trump? Its Hillary's job to get those votes. She is failing because there is little difference between her and trump. Look at the unfavorable number one is at 62%, the other has 60%. When you talk about how bad the other person is all the time, you are not making a case for yourself. |
Anonymous
Everything you said is true in an ideal world. It even makes sense had the GOP nominated Jeb or Kasich as their candidate. They are reasonable men with decent policies who are not driven by narcissistic ego or bigotism. BUT GIVEN TRUMP is the candidate, if he is elected he will be much worse than George W ever was. Does that serve your principle? Does that serve what Sanders stood for? Trump is antithetical to all things Sanders stood for, antithetical to the very core of this country and even to democracy(he is inciting his supporters to protest if he lost the election). Bravo! Idealism without practicality is worse than a no nothing Trump supporter. |
Anonymous
Wow! you have not been reading anything on her policies. If you are truly an educated Sanders voter, you would have already checked out Hillary's website and compared that to the tax cut for the wealthy and wall as policy in Trump's website. But then you are most likely a Trump voter posing as Sanders voter. |
Anonymous
|
It is fun to watch these posters (likely from Correct the Record) work so hard to try to convince some of us not to “throw away” our vote.
You might want to seek a real job. Your position at CTR will disappear in a couple of months. |
Anonymous
Some of you keep saying this. It's really offensive that you think that anyone who likes Hillary must necessarily be paid. It makes me believe that the PP who thinks you're a Trump voter masquerading as a Sanders supporter is correct. And oh my god, go back in the archives. We have done the "why I am voting for Hillary and you should, too" to death. |
Anonymous
Many people have made the case for Hillary, but it all falls on deaf ears. She has a lot of experience, she has put forth substantial policy proposals. If you are a liberal, she will make liberal court appointments, and generally supports center-left policies. For making a positive case for Clinton on DCUM, I will get to be called a Hillbot and be told, "But, but emails, Bhenghazi, blowjobs...," and how she is the most corrupt politician in American history by people who don't know what Teapot Dome or Credit Mobilier is. |
Anonymous
I sound like I'm talking about Obama how, exactly? Great, the under 35 vote is seems completely ignorant. What does that have to do with you, who I presume are around 45? Hillary's failing because of misogyny, the press isn't doing their job, and uneducated voters like you. If you think that there is little difference between Hillary and Donald, there is not enough intelligence in the world to straighten out that crooked ass worldview. Enjoy your last little protest vote. Stein seems like.... not a great candidate, but you don't seem to care. |
Anonymous
FYI - I am a new poster, so your belief is incorrect as it applies to me. I have little doubt that there are CTR posters here. They are like a dog with a bone. I wonder if they are paid per post, or whether they get some kind of salary. And, in case you doubt these folks getting paid to post to sites like this............. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/21/hillary-pac-spends-1-million-to-correct-commenters-on-reddit-and-facebook.html |